Characteristics of imported cases of Dengue fever and hemorrhagic Dengue fever in 2009–2019

Cover Image

Cite item

Abstract

Introduction. In Russia, the approved morbidity statistics system is represented by the International Classification of Diseases of the 10th revision (ICD-10). This classification provides two forms of dengue fever (DF): dengue fever (A90) and hemorrhagic dengue (A91). Official statistics on the ratio of forms of DF is not published in open sources and this lack of information about the real ratio of the forms of DF makes it difficult to objectively assess the factors that determine the severity of this disease.

The aim: compare the clinical and epidemiological features of dengue fever and hemorrhagic dengue fever in patients hospitalized in 2009–2019 to the City Infectious Clinical Hospital No. 1, Moscow.

Materials and methods. A retrospective cohort study. We analyzed the patient database and reviewed 391 medical records of patients with diagnosed dengue fever. We compared gender, age characteristics, travel geography including information about previous visits of patients to endemic regions and dengue virus serotype. To determine the primary and re-infection rate, an analysis of IgG for the dengue virus was carried out on days 1–5 of the disease. To compare indicators, 95% confidence intervals for proportions, medians, and interquartile ranges were calculated. The significance of differences between independent samples for assessing qualitative characteristics was carried out using the criteria χ2, the odds ratio. To assess the quantitative characteristics, the Mann-Whitney test was used. Differences were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

Results. The proportion of patients with dengue fever was 14.9% of all hospitalized with febrile illnesses that developed after international travel. Hemorrhagic dengue fever (DHF) was diagnosed in 15.7% of patients with dengue fever. DHF developed significantly more often in women, as well as in those who had history of repeated visits to endemic regions. However, DHF was also diagnosed in 10.9% of first-time travelers to tropical countries. We did not find significant differences in the rates of DHF development depending on age and dengue virus serotype. In a number of patients who had not previously traveled to endemic regions, IgG to the dengue virus were detected, which may indicate a previous infection with related flaviviruses.

Conclusion. It has been established that in the regions most visited by Russians, there is a circulation of all serotypes of the dengue virus with an annual change in the predominant serotype.

About the authors

Mukhammad A. Sayfullin

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Research Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology named after the honorary academician N.F. Gamaleya of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: dr_saifullin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1058-3193
Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow; 123098, Moscow

Nadezda N. Zvereva

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: dr_saifullin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2699-0439
Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow

Luidmila S. Karan

Central Research Institute of Epidemiology» of the Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing

Email: dr_saifullin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5927-460X
Russian Federation, 111123, Moscow

Yana E. Grigoreva

Central Research Institute of Epidemiology» of the Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing

Email: dr_saifullin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9016-9923
Russian Federation, 111123, Moscow

Yulia A. Akinshina

Research Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology named after the honorary academician N.F. Gamaleya of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; CJSC “EcoLab”

Email: dr_saifullin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9223-3455
Russian Federation, 123098, Moscow; 142530, Elektrogorsk, Moscow region

Victor F. Larichev

Research Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology named after the honorary academician N.F. Gamaleya of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Email: dr_saifullin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8262-5650
Russian Federation, 123098, Moscow

Olga V. Shamsheva

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: dr_saifullin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6033-6695
Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow

Marina V. Bazarova

City Infectious Clinical Hospital No. 1, Moscow

Email: dr_saifullin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7322-7896
Russian Federation, 125367, Moscow

Svetlana V. Smetanina

City Infectious Clinical Hospital No. 1, Moscow

Email: dr_saifullin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3763-697X
Russian Federation, 125367, Moscow

References

  1. Larichev V.F., Sayfullin M.A., Akinshina Yu.A., Khutoretskaya N.V., Butenko A.M. Imported cases of arbovirus infections in the Russian Federation. Epidemiologiya i infektsionnye bolezni. 2012; (1): 35–8. (in Russian)
  2. State report «On the state of sanitary and epidemiological welfare of the population in the Russian Federation in 2020». Moscow; 2021. (in Russian)
  3. Sayfullin M.A., Kelli E.I., Bazarova M.V., Larichev V.F., Karan’ L.S., Akinshina Yu.A., et al. Dengue fever fatal case. Epidemiologiya i infektsionnye bolezni. 2015; 20(2): 49–51. (in Russian)
  4. D’yachkov A.G., Lioznov D.A., Doroshkevich V.V. Case report of dengue hemorrhagic fever. Zhurnal infektologii. 2013; 5(3): 71–3. https://doi.org/10.22625/2072-6732-2013-5-3-71-73 (in Russian)
  5. Safonov A.D. A case of imported dengue hemorrhagic fever in Omsk. Epidemiologiya i infektsionnye bolezni. 2012; (1): 49–51. (in Russian)
  6. Nadeev A.P., Mal’tseva Yu.G., Shishkina E.Yu., Porotnikova E.V., Khokhlova N.I. Fatal dengue fever. Arkhiv patologii. 2020; 82(1): 52–5. https://doi.org/10.17116/patol20208201152 (in Russian)
  7. Nechaev V.V., Yarovaya I.I., Kachenya G.V., Doguzhieva E.V., Buntovskaya S.S., Egorikhina A.D., et al. Clinical-epidemiological characteristics delivery cases of tropic dengue fever. Zhurnal infektologii. 2021; 13(1): 78–85. https://doi.org/10.22625/2072-6732-2021-13-1-78-85 (in Russian)
  8. Khokhlova N.I., Krasnova E.I., Pozdnyakova L.L. Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of dengue fever in travelers. Zhurnal infektologii. 2015; 7(1): 65–9. https://doi.org/10.22625/2072-6732-2015-7-1-65-69 (in Russian)
  9. WHO. Fact sheets. Dengue and severe dengue. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dengue-and-severe-dengue
  10. Halstead S. Recent advances in understanding dengue. F1000Res. 2019; 8: F1000 Faculty Rev-1279. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19197.1
  11. Waggoner J.J., Balmaseda A., Gresh L., Sahoo M.K., Montoya M., Wang E., et al. Homotypic dengue virus reinfections in Nicaraguan children. J. Infect. Dis. 2016; 214(7): 986–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw099
  12. Dengue fever in adults. Clinical recommendations. Approved by the decision of the Plenum of the Board of the National Scientific Society of Infectious Diseases on October 30, 2014. Available at: https://nnoi.ru/uploads/files/protokoly/Lih_Denge_adult.pdf (in Russian)
  13. Holmes E.C., Twiddy S.S. The origin, emergence and evolutionary genetics of dengue virus. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2003; 3(1): 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1567-1348(03)00004-2
  14. Simmons C.P., Farrar J.J., Nguyen V.C., Wills B. Dengue. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012; 366(15): 1423–32. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1110265
  15. Huy N.T., Van Giang T., Thuy D.H., Kikuchi M., Hien T.T., Zamora J., et al. Factors associated with dengue shock syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013; 7(9): 2412. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002412
  16. Nikolaeva L.I., Larichev V.F., Sayfullin M.A., Dedova A.V., Grishechkin A.E., Vasil’ev A.V., et al. Analysis of the possible association of patients’ genetic factors with course of dengue virus infection. Infektsionnye bolezni: Novosti. Mneniya. Obuchenie. 2022; 11(1): 8–14. https://doi.org/10.33029/2305-3496-2022-11-1-8-14 (in Russian)
  17. Bhatt P., Sabeena S.P., Varma M., Arunkumar G. Current understanding of the pathogenesis of Dengue virus infection. Curr. Microbiol. 2021; 78(1): 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-02284-w
  18. Xavier-Carvalho C., Cardoso C.C., de Souza Kehdy F., Pacheco A.G., Moraes M.O. Host genetics and dengue fever. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2017; 56: 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2017.11.009
  19. WHO. Dengue haemorrhagic fever: diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control. Geneva; 1997.
  20. Harapan H., Michie A., Sasmono R.T., Imrie A. Dengue: a minireview. Viruses. 2020; 12(8): 829. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12080829

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Distribution of cases of dengue fever in the Russian Federation in 2019 (according Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing).

Download (326KB)
3. Fig. 2. The number of cases of dengue fever diagnosed in city Infectious Clinical Hospital (Moscow) in 2009–2019.

Download (115KB)
4. Fig. 3. The ratio of dengue virus serotypes in patients arriving from Thailand, Indonesia and Vietnam.

Download (75KB)
5. Fig. 4. The ratio of dengue virus serotypes in patients infected in Thailand 2013–2019.

Download (112KB)

Copyright (c) 2022 Sayfullin M.A., Zvereva N.N., Karan L.S., Grigoreva Y.E., Akinshina Y.A., Larichev V.F., Shamsheva O.V., Bazarova M.V., Smetanina S.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies