Variable agreement and the structure of coordination

Cover Page

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Modern formal approaches to syntax propose different underlying structures for coordinate constructions. At the same time, none of them describe the entire set of properties of coordination, including variable predicate agreement in number (and gender). The goal of the paper is to define the internal organization of coordinate phrases. As the study of examples from the Russian treebank demonstrates, in addition to the previously known factors, the choice of agreement strategy is also influenced by the linear length of conjuncts and the distance between them and the verbal head. Additionally, the strategy of matching the nearest (and not necessarily the first) conjunct is relevant for Russian. We present and analyze the corpus data and conclude that there is no hierarchical organization in coordination. This lets us elaborate on some general ideas about syntactic derivation put forward by Noam Chomsky.

About the authors

Pavel V. Grashchenkov

Lomonosov Moscow State University; Artificial Intelligence Research Institute

Author for correspondence.
Email: pavel.gra@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

References

  1. Архипов 2005 — Архипов А. В. Типология комитативных конструкций. Дисс. … канд. филол. наук. М.: МГУ им. М. В. Ломоносова, 2005. [Arkhipov A. V. Tipologiya komitativnykh konstruktsii [Typology of comitative constructions]. Cand. diss. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State Univ., 2005.]
  2. Белова, Давидюк 2022 — Белова Д. Д., Давидюк Т. И. Предикативное согласование с сочиненным подлежащим в русском языке. Типология морфосинтаксических параметров, 2022, 5(1): 13–34. [Belova D. D., Davidyuk T. I. Predicate agreement with coordinated subjects in Russian. Typology of Morphosyntactic Parameters, 2022, 5(1): 13–34.]
  3. Гращенков 2024 — Гращенков П. В. RuConst: Синтаксический корпус русского языка с разметкой по составляющим. Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 9. Филология, 2024, 3: 94–112. [Grashchenkov P. V. RuConst: A treebank for Russian. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 9. Filologiya, 2024, 3: 94–112.]
  4. Зализняк, Падучева 1979 — Зализняк А. А., Падучева Е. В. Синтаксические свойства местоимения который. Категория определенности-неопределенности в славянских и балканских языках. Николаева Т. М. (ред.). М.: Наука, 1979, 289–329. [Zaliznyak A. A., Paducheva E. V. Syntactic properties of the pronoun kotoryj ‘which’. Kategoriya opredelennosti-neopredelennosti v slavyanskikh i balkanskikh yazykakh. Nikolaeva T. M. (ed.). Moscow: Nauka, 1979, 289–329.]
  5. Казенин 2011 — Казенин К. И. Проблема «размеров» конъюнктов в русском языке: данные некоторых типов сочинительных конструкций. Вопросы языкознания, 2011, 4: 46–60. [Kazenin K. I. The issue of conjuncts’ «size» in Russian: Some types of coordinative constructions. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 2011, 4: 46–60.]
  6. Кодзасов 1987 — Кодзасов С. В. Число в сочинительных конструкциях. Моделирование языковой деятельности в интеллектуальных системах. Кибрик А. Е., Нариньяни А. С. (ред.). М.: Наука, 1987, 204–219. [Kodzasov S. V. Number in coordinate constructions. Modelirovanie yazykovoi deyatel’nosti v intellektual’nykh sistemakh. Kibrik A. E., Narin’yani A. S. (eds.). Moscow: Nauka, 1987, 204–219.]
  7. Лютикова 2023 — Лютикова Е. А. О согласовательной вариативности в русском языке. Русский язык в научном освещении, 2023, 2(46): 200–219. [Lyutikova E. A. On agreement variation in Russian. Russkii yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii, 2023, 2(46): 200-219.]
  8. Лютикова, Герасимова 2021 — Лютикова Е. А., Герасимова А. А. Русские острова в свете экспериментальных данных. М.: Буки Веди, 2021. [Lyutikova E. A., Gerasimova A. A. Russkie ostrova v svete eksperimental’nykh dannykh [Russian islands in the light of experimental data]. Moscow: Buki Vedi, 2021.]
  9. Паско 2023 — Паско Л. И. Против ATB-анализа частичного согласования в русском языке: экспериментальное исследование. Рема. Rhema, 2023, 2: 89–103. [Pasko L. I. Against ATB analysis of partial agreement in Russian: An experimental study. Rema. Rhema, 2023, 2: 89–103.]
  10. Пекелис 2013 — Пекелис О. Е. «Частичное согласование» в конструкции с повторяющимся союзом: корпусное исследование основных закономерностей. Вопросы языкознания, 2013, 4: 55–86. [Pekelis O. E. Partial agreement with subjects linked by a correlative conjunction: A corpus-based study of main regularities. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 2013, 4: 55–86.]
  11. Пешковский 1928/2001 — Пешковский А. М. Русский синтаксис в научном освещении. 8-е изд. М.: Языки славянских культур, 2001. [Peshkovskii A. M. Russkii sintaksis v nauchnom osveshchenii [Russian syntax in a scientific light]. 8th edn. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur, 2001.]
  12. Подлесская 2012 — Подлесская В. И. Структурная и линейно-просодическая целостность именных групп по данным корпусного исследования: сочиненные и комитативные группы с личным местоимением первого лица в русском языке. Вопросы языкознания, 2012, 1: 42–65. [Podlesskaya V. I. Structural, linear and prosodic integrity of NPs: Coordinate and comitative constructions with 1st sg personal pronouns in Russian (a corpus-based study). Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 2012, 1: 42–65.]
  13. РГ 1980 — Шведова Н. Ю. (гл. ред.). Русская грамматика. В 2 т. Т. 2 М.: Наука, 1980. [Shvedova N. Yu. (ed.). Russkaya grammatika [Russian grammar]. In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow: Nauka, 1980.]
  14. Санников 2008 — Санников В. З. Русский синтаксис в семантико-прагматическом пространстве. М.: Языки славянских культур, 2008. [Sannikov V. Z. Russkii sintaksis v semantiko-pragmaticheskom prostranstve [Russian syntax in a semantic-pragmatic aspect]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur, 2008.]
  15. Студеникина 2018 — Студеникина К. А. Синтаксис сочинения русских именных групп: эллипсис или малые конъюнкты Типология морфосинтаксических параметров, 2018, 1(2): 115–133. [Studenikina K. A. The syntax of coordination of Russian noun phrases: Ellipsis or small conjuncts Typology of Morphosyntactic Parameters, 2018, 1(2): 115–133.]
  16. Тестелец 2001 — Тестелец Я. Г. Введение в общий синтаксис. М.: РГГУ, 2001. [Testelets Ya. G. Vvedenie v obshchii sintaksis [Introduction to general syntax]. Moscow: Russian State Univ. for the Humanities, 2001.]
  17. Babyonyshev 1997 — Babyonyshev M. Covert feature checking and conjunction agreement in Russian. Paper presented at 1997 Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (FASL), Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, 1997.
  18. Benmamoun et al. 2009 — Benmamoun E., Bhatia A., Polinsky M. Closest conjunct agreement in head final languages. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 2009, 9: 67–88.
  19. Camacho 1997 — Camacho J. A. The syntax of NP coordination. Doctoral diss. Los Angeles: Univ. of Southern California, 1997.
  20. Camacho 2000 — Camacho J. On the structure of conjunction. Ellipsis in conjunction. Schwabe K., Zhang N. (eds.). Tübingen: Newmeyer, 2000, 23–50.
  21. Chomsky 1981 — Chomsky N. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris, 1981.
  22. Chomsky 2001 — Chomsky N. Beyond explanatory adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics. Iss. 20. Cambridge (MA): MIT, 2001.
  23. Chomsky 2013 — Chomsky N. Problems of projection. Lingua, 2013, 130: 33–49.
  24. Citko 2005 — Citko B. On the nature of merge: External merge, internal merge, and parallel merge. Linguistic Inquiry, 2005, 36(4): 475–496.
  25. Gold et al. 2018 — Gold J. W., Arsenijević B., Batinić M., Becker M., Nermina Č., Kresić M., Leko N., Marušič F. L., Milićev T., Milićević N., Mitić I., Peti-Stantić A., Stanković B., Šuligoj T., Tušek J., Nevins A. When linearity prevails over hierarchy in syntax. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018, 3(115): 495–500.
  26. Goodall 1987 — Goodall G. Parallel structures in syntax. Coordination, causatives and restructuring. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1987.
  27. Harizanov, Gribanova 2015 — Harizanov B., Gribanova V. How across-the-board movement interacts with nominal concord in Bulgarian. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 2015, 49: 115–129.
  28. Hawkins 1990 — Hawkins J. A. A parsing theory of word order universals. Linguistic Inquiry, 1990, 21(2): 223–261.
  29. Hornstein 2009 — Hornstein N. A theory of syntax: Minimal operations and UG. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009.
  30. Hudson 1980 — Hudson R. A. Constituency and dependency. Linguistics, 1980, 18(3–4): 179–198.
  31. Hudson 1987 — Hudson R. A. Zwicky on heads. Journal of Linguistics, 1987, 23: 109–132.
  32. Jackendoff 1977 — Jackendoff R. X̄ syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1977.
  33. Johannessen 1998 — Johannessen J. B. Coordination. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1998.
  34. Kayne 1994 — Kayne R. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1994.
  35. Krejci 2020 — Krejci B. Syntactic and semantic perspectives on first conjunct agreement in Russian. Doctoral diss. Stanford: Stanford Univ., 2020.
  36. Madariaga, Igartua 2017 — Madariaga N., Igartua I. Idiosyncratic (dis)agreement patterns: The structure and diachrony of Russian paucal subjects. Scando-Slavica, 2017, 63(2): 99–132.
  37. Munn 1993 — Munn A. Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordinate structures. Ph.D. diss. College Park (MD): Univ. of Maryland, 1993.
  38. Nevins, Weisser 2019 —Nevins A., Weisser P. Closest conjunct agreement. Annual Review of Linguistics, 2019, 5(1): 219–241.
  39. Progovac 1998a — Progovac L. Structure for Coordination. Part I. Glot International, 1998, 3(7): 3–6.
  40. Progovac 1998b — Progovac L. Structure for Coordination. Part II. Glot International, 1998, 3(8): 3–9.
  41. Rizzi 2016 — Rizzi L. Labeling, maximality and the head — phrase distinction. The Linguistic Review, 2016, 33(1): 103–127.
  42. Ross 1967 — Ross J. Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. diss. Cambridge (MA): MIT, 1967.
  43. Sag et al. 1985 — Sag I. A., Gazdar G., Wasow T., Weisler S. Coordination and how to distinguish categories. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1985, 3: 117–171.
  44. te Velde 2005 — te Velde J. Deriving coordinate symmetries. A phase-based approach integrating Select, Merge, Copy and Match. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2005.
  45. de Vries 2003 — de Vries M. Hierarchy in coordinate structures. Germania et alia: A linguistic webschrift for Hans den Besten. Koster J., Riemsdijk H. V. (eds.). 2003, 1–15.
  46. Wilder 1994 — Wilder C. Coordination, ATB and ellipsis. Minimalism and Kayne’s antisymmetry hypothesis. Groningen Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik, 1994, 37: 291–329.
  47. Wilder 1997 — Wilder C. Some properties of ellipsis in coordination. Studies on universal grammar and typological variation. Alexiadou A., Hall T. A. (eds.). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1997, 59–107.
  48. Zoerner 1995 — Zoerner E. Coordination: The syntax of &P. Doctoral diss. Irvine: Univ. of California, 1995.
  49. Zwicky 1985 — Zwicky A. M. Heads. Journal of Linguistics, 1985, 21: 1–29.

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies