Comparison of Runoff Components, Water Balance, and the Parameters of Conceptual Models HBV and GR4J: Case Study of the Upper Ussuri Basin (South of Primorsky Region, Pacific Russia)

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The efficiency of runoff simulation, the values of parameters, and the dynamics of the estimated runoff components were analyzed for two conceptual hydrological models GR4J and HBV for 17 watersheds in the Upper Ussuri River (Primorsky Krai, Russia) with areas from 138 to 24 400 km2. Both models demonstrate an increase in the simulation efficiency (based on NSE criterion) with an increase in the catchment area up to 1–2 thousand km2, after which they stabilize within the interval of 0.75–0.85 for the calibration period and 0.70–0.80 for the verification period. The estimates obtained for the HBV model were 5–10% higher than those for the GR4J model. Analysis of the measured and calculated annual runoff maximums over the warm season suggests the conclusion that GR4J model is on the average 5–6% more efficient than the HBV model in calculating the maximal values of rain flood discharges. At the same time, the obtained values of the relative error BIAS demonstrate a more accurate reproduction of the annual average runoff by the HBV model. The main distinctions determining the efficiency of simulation in the study region are as follows: the method of considering the precipitation height increments within altitude belts, the specific features of the calculation of model evapotranspiration, the method for calculating the outflow from conceptual runoff-forming storages in the GR4J and HBV models.

Негізгі сөздер

Авторлар туралы

S. Lupakov

Pacific Geographical Institute, Far-Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 690041, Vladivostok, Russia

Email: rbir@mail.ru
Россия, 690041, Владивосток

A. Bugaets

Pacific Geographical Institute, Far-Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 690041, Vladivostok, Russia

Email: andreybugaets@yandex.ru
Россия, 690041, Владивосток

L. Gonchukov

Far-Eastern Regional Research Hydrometeorological Institute, 690091, Vladivostok, Russia; Water Problems Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117971, Moscow, Russia

Email: rbir@mail.ru
Россия, 690091, Владивосток; Россия, 117971, Москва

O. Sokolov

Far-Eastern Regional Research Hydrometeorological Institute, 690091, Vladivostok, Russia

Email: rbir@mail.ru
Россия, 690091, Владивосток

N. Bugaets

Pacific Geographical Institute, Far-Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 690041, Vladivostok, Russia

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: rbir@mail.ru
Россия, 690041, Владивосток

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Бугаец А.Н., Гарцман Б.И., Краснопеев С.М., Бугаец Н.Д. Опыт обработки информации модернизированной гидрологической сети с использованием системы управления данными CUAHSI HIS ODM // Метеорология и гидрология. 2013. № 5. С. 91–101.
  2. Бугаец А.Н., Пшеничникова Н.Ф., Терешкина А.А., Краснопеев С.М., Гарцман Б.И. Анализ пространственной дифференциации почвенного покрова юга Приморья на примере бассейна р. Комаровка // Почвоведение. 2015. № 3. С. 268–276. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0032180X15030028
  3. Виноградов Ю.Б. Математическое моделирование процессов формирования стока. Л.: Гидрометеоиздат, 1988. 312 с.
  4. Лупаков С.Ю., Бугаец А.Н. Использование концептуальной модели речного стока HBV для анализа паводков на малых водосборах // Метеорология и гидрология. 2022. № 1. С. 84–94. https://doi.org/10.52002/0130-2906-2022-1-84-94
  5. Лупаков С.Ю., Бугаец А.Н., Шамов В.В. Применение различных структур модели HBV для исследования процессов формирования стока на примере экспериментальных водосборов // Вод. ресурсы. 2021. Т. 48. С. 417–426. https://doi.org/10.31857/S032105962104012X
  6. Мотовилов Ю.Г., Гельфан А.Н. Модели формирования стока в задачах гидрологии речных бассейнов. М.: РАН, 2018. 300 с. https://doi.org/10.31857/S9785907036222000001
  7. Симонов Ю.А., Семенова Н.К., Христофоров А.В. Методика краткосрочных прогнозов расходов воды на реках бассейна Камы на основе использования модели HBV // Метеорология и гидрология. 2021. № 6. С. 55–65. https://doi.org/10.52002/0130-2906-2021-6-55-65
  8. Ayzel G. Runoff predictions in ungauged Arctic basins using conceptual models forced by reanalysis data // Water Resour. 2018. V. 45 (S2). P. S1–S7. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807818060180
  9. Ayzel G., Abramov D. OPENFORECAST: an assessment of the operational run in 2020–2021 // Geosci. (Switzerland). 2022. V. 12 (2). P. 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020067
  10. Bergstrom S. Development and application of a conceptual runoff model for Scandinavian catchments. Norrkoping, Sweden: Univ. Lund. Bull., 1976. 134 p.
  11. Beven K. Rainfall-runoff modelling. The Primer. Chichester: Ltd. John Wiley & Sons, 2001. 356 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119951001
  12. Bugaets A.N., Gartsman B.I., Gonchukov L.V., Lupakov S.Y., Shamov V.V., Pshenichnikova N.F., Tereshkina A.A. Modeling the hydrological regime of small testbed catchments based on field observations: a case study of the Pravaya Sokolovka River, the Upper Ussuri River basin // Water Resour. 2019. V. 42 (S2). P. S8–S16. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807819080037
  13. Bugaets A.N., Gonchukov L.V., Sokolov O.V., Gartsman B.I., Krasnopeev S.M. Information system to support regional hydrological monitoring and forecasting // Water Resour. 2018. V. 45 (S1). P. S59–S66. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807818050329
  14. Clark M.P., Kavetski D., Fenicia F. Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling // Wat. Res. Res. 2011. V. 47. W09301. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010wr009827
  15. Gassman P.W., Reyes M.R., Green C.H., Arnold J.G. The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research and directions // Am. Soc. Agricultural Biol. Engineers. 2007. V. 50. № 4. P. 1211–1250. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23637
  16. Haddeland I., Clark D.B., Franssen et al. Multimodel Estimate of the Global Terrestrial Water Balance: Setup and First Results // Hydrometeorol. 2011. V. 12. P. 869– 884. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JHM1324.1
  17. Klemes V. Operational testing of hydrologic simulation models // Hydrolog. Sci. J. 1986. V. 31. P. 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626668609491024
  18. Moriasi D.N., Arnold J.G., Van Liew M.W., Bingner R.L., Harmel R.D., Veith T.L. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations // Trans. ASABE. 2007. V. 50. P. 885–900. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153
  19. Mroczkowski M., Raper G.P., Kuczera G. The quest for more powerful validation of conceptual catchment models // Water Resour. Res. 1997. V. 26. P. 2275–2286. https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR01922
  20. Oudin L., Hervieu F., Michel C., Perrin C., Andreassian V., Anctil F., Loumagne C. Which potential evapotranspiration input for a lumped rainfall–runoff model? Pt 2. Towards a simple and efficient potential evapotranspiration model for rainfall–runoff modelling // J. Hydrol. 2005. V. 303. P. 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.026
  21. Perrin C., Michel C., Andreassian V. Improvement of a Parsimonious Model for Streamflow Simulation // J. Hydrol. 2003. V. 279. P. 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7
  22. Rango A., Martinec J. Revisiting the degree-day method for snowmelt computations // Water Resour. Bull. 1995. V. 31. P. 657–669. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1995.tb03392.x
  23. Seibert J., Bergstrom S. A retrospective on hydrological catchment modelling based on half a century with the HBV model // Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2022. V. 26. P. 1371–1388. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1371-2022
  24. Seibert J., Vis M. Teaching hydrological modelling with a user-friendly catchment-runoff-model software package // Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2012. V. 16. P. 3315–3325. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3315-2012
  25. Uhlenbrook S., Seibert J., Leibundgut C., Rodhe A. Prediction uncertainty of conceptual rainfall-runoff models caused by problems in identifying model parameters and structure // Hydrol. Sci. J. 1999. V. 44. № 5. P. 779–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669909492273
  26. Valery A. Modélisation précipitations-débit sous influence nivale, élaboration d’un module neige et évaluation sur 380 bassins versants. Paris: Cemagref, 2010. 405 p.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
2.

Жүктеу (1MB)
3.

Жүктеу (506KB)
4.

Жүктеу (159KB)

© С.Ю. Лупаков, А.Н. Бугаец, Л.В. Гончуков, О.В. Соколов, Н.Д. Бугаец, 2023

Осы сайт cookie-файлдарды пайдаланады

Біздің сайтты пайдалануды жалғастыра отырып, сіз сайттың дұрыс жұмыс істеуін қамтамасыз ететін cookie файлдарын өңдеуге келісім бересіз.< / br>< / br>cookie файлдары туралы< / a>