Winter Dynamics of Drifting Invertebrates’ Vertical Distribution in a Small Salmon River

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The composition of the winter syrton of a small salmon river was dominated by mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera), dipteran larvae (Diptera), and adult water mites (Hydracarina). The presence of a significant linear dependence of the number of drifters entering the nets on the volume of water filtered by the nets has not been proven, so we used not the syrton density (ind./m3), but the data of actual catches. The vertical distribution of drifting invertebrates of different taxonomic affiliation had its own characteristics. Under conditions of good illumination of the water column, the drift intensity of invertebrates increased in the daytime. This fact is probably indirectly related to the low water temperature, which limits the swimming ability of drift-feeding fish, which because of this become more vulnerable to fish-feeding warm-blooded predators, and therefore in winter during daylight hours lead a predominantly inactive and secretive way of life. In December, most daytime drifters migrated near the surface of the water column, and in January, on the contrary, near the bottom. The latter may be due to the overwhelming effect of lower daytime air temperatures, since until mid-February the riverbed was not completely covered with ice. After a heavy February snowfall, the upper layers of the river flow turned out to be isolated from the effect of air temperature, and the level of illumination of the water column during the day began to correspond to the period of late twilight. As a result, fish became less accessible to warm-blooded semiaquatic predators, the intensity of invertebrate drift in the daylight hours decreased sharply, and the distribution of drifters throughout the water column vertical became fairly uniform.

About the authors

M. V. Astakhov

Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: mvastakhov@mail.ru
Russia, Vladivostok

References

  1. Александров А.А., Трахтенгерц М.С. 1978. Вода. Плотность при атмосферном давлении и температурах от 0 до 100°С. Таблицы стандартных справочных данных ГСССД 2-77. М: Изд-во стандартов.
  2. Алексеевский Н.И. 2006. Гидрофизика. Москва: Академия.
  3. Астахов М.В. 2009. Дрифт фито- и зообентоса в модельной лососевой реке Кедровой (Приморский край, Россия). Дис. … канд. биол. наук. Владивосток.
  4. Богатов В.В. 1995. Комбинированная концепция функционирования речных экосистем // Вест. ДВО РАН. № 3. С. 51.
  5. Богатов В.В., Астахов М.В. 2013. Вертикальное распределение дрейфующих личинок поденок и двукрылых на перекате р. Кедровая (Приморский край) // Вест. СВНЦ ДВО РАН. № 1. С. 39.
  6. Васильев Н.Г., Панкратьев А.Г., Панов Е.Н. 1965. Заповедник “Кедровая падь”. Владивосток: Дальневост. книж. изд-во.
  7. Есин Е.В., Чебанова В.В., Леман В.Н. 2009. Экосистема малой лососевой реки Западной Камчатки (среда обитания, донное население и ихтиофауна). М: КМК.
  8. Живоглядов А.А. 2004. Структура и механизмы функционирования сообществ рыб малых нерестовых рек острова Сахалин. М: ВНИРО.
  9. Ключарева О.А. 1963. О скате и суточных вертикальных миграциях донных беспозвоночных Амура // Зоол. журн. Т. 42. Вып. 11. С. 1601.
  10. Константинов А.С. 1969. Сиртон и бентосток Волги близ Саратова в 1966 году // Зоол. журн. Т. 48. Вып. 1. С. 20.
  11. Леванидова И.М., Леванидов В.Я. 1965. Суточные миграции донных личинок насекомых в речной струе. 1. Миграция личинок поденок в реке Хор // Зоол. журн. Т. 44. Вып. 3. С. 373.
  12. Леванидов В.Я., Леванидова И.М. 1979. Дрифт водных насекомых в реке Амур // Систематика и экология рыб континентальных водоемов Дальнего Востока. Владивосток: ДВНЦ АН СССР. С. 3.
  13. Павлов К.Ф., Романков П.Г., Носков А.А. 1987. Примеры и задачи по курсу процессов и аппаратов химической технологии. Ленинград: Химия.
  14. Павлов Д.С., Скоробогатов М.А. 2014. Миграции рыб в зарегулированных реках. М: КМК.
  15. Семенченко А.Ю. 1977. Зимовка рыб в водотоках заповедника “Кедровая падь” // Пресноводная фауна заповедника “Кедровая падь”. Владивосток: ДВНЦ АН СССР. С. 159.
  16. Тарадина Д.Г., Павлов Д.С., Лупандин А.И. 1997. Связь вертикального распределения молоди рыб при покатной миграции с их плавучестью и турбулентностью потока // Вопр. ихтиологии. 1997. Т. 37. № 4. С. 532.
  17. Тарасов А.Г., Тарасова Г.В. 1997. Бентосток нижней части среднего течения р. Урал // Биология внутр. вод. № 1. С. 59.
  18. Травина Т.Н. 2014. Дрифт донных беспозвоночных в период ледостава в р. Большая (Западная Камчатка) // Чтения памяти В.Я. Леванидова. Вып. 6. С. 713.
  19. Чебанова В.В. 2009. Бентос лососевых рек Камчатки. Москва: ВНИРО.
  20. Шубина В.Н. 2006. Бентос лососевых рек Урала и Тимана. СПб: Наука.
  21. Allan J.D., Feifarek B.P. 1989. Distances travelled by drifting mayfly nymphs: factors influencing return to the substrate // J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. V. 8. № 4. P. 322. https://doi.org/10.2307/1467495
  22. Astakhov M.V. 2012. Stratifying drift sampler // Amur. Zool. J. V. 4. № 1. P. 3. https://www.biotaxa.org/azj/issue/view/9865/918
  23. Astakhov M.V., Bogatov V.V. 2014. Vertical redistribution of drifting benthic invertebrates in the Kedrovaya River, Primorsky Region of Russia // Open J. Ecol. V. 4. № 2. P. 53. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2014.42007
  24. Berner L.M. 1951. Limnology of the Lower Missouri River // Ecology. V. 32. № 1. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/1930968
  25. Bogatov V.V., Astakhov M.V. 2011. Under-ice drift of invertebrates in the piedmont part of Kedrovaya River (Primorskii Krai) // Inland Water Biol. V. 4. № 1. P. 56. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995082911010032
  26. Gorovaya E.A. 2022. Dynamics of the mayfly community structure (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) of a small salmon river in South Primorye // Inland Water Biol. V. 15. № 6. P. 891. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995082922060062
  27. Campbell R.N.B. 1985. Comparison of the drift of live and dead Baetis nymphs in a weakening water current // Hydrobiologia. V. 126. P. 229. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00007500
  28. Clifford H.F. 1972. A years’ study of the drifting organisms in a brown-water stream of Alberta, Canada // Can. J. Zool. V. 50. № 7. P. 975. https://doi.org/10.1139/z72-130
  29. Copp G.H., Faulkner H., Doherty S. et al. 2002. Diel drift behaviour of fish eggs and larvae, in particular barbel, Barbus barbus (L.), in an English chalk stream // Fish. Manag. Ecol. V. 9. Iss. 2. P. 95. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2400.2002.00286.x
  30. Crisp D.T., Gledhill T. 1970. A quantitative description of the recovery of the bottom fauna in a muddy reach of a mill stream in southern England after draining and dredging // Arch. Hydrobiol. Bd 67. H. 4. S. 502.
  31. D’Amours J., Thibodeau S., Fortin R. 2001. Comparison of lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens), Stizostedion spp., Catostomus spp., Moxostoma spp., quillback (Carpiodes cyprinus), and mooneye (Hiodon tergisus) larval drift in Des Prairies River, Quebec // Can. J. Zool. V. 79. № 8. P. 1472. https://doi.org/10.1139/z01-095
  32. Douglas P.L., Forrester G.E., Cooper S.D. 1994. Effects of trout on the diel periodicity of drifting in baetid mayflies // Oecologia. V. 98. P. 48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00326089
  33. Downes B.J. 2010. Back to the future: little-used tools and principles of scientific inference can help disentangle effects of multiple stressors on freshwater ecosystems // Freshwater Biol. V. 55. P. 60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02377.x
  34. Downes B.J., Lancaster J. 2010. Does dispersal control population densities in advection-dominated systems? A fresh look at critical assumptions and a direct test // J. Anim. Ecol. V. 79. Iss. 1. P. 235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01620.x
  35. Elliott J.M. 1971. The distances travelled by drifting invertebrates in a Lake District stream // Oecologia. V. 6. P. 350. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389109
  36. Fenoglio S., Bo T., Gallina G., Cucco M. 2004. Vertical distrubution in the water column of drifting stream macroinvertebrates // J. Freshwater Ecol. V. 19. № 3. P. 485. https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2004.9664923
  37. Flecker A.S. 1992. Fish predation and the evolution of invertebrate drift periodicity: evidence from neotropical streams // Ecology. V. 73. Iss. 2. P. 438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940751
  38. Fraser N.H.C., Metcalfe N.B., Thorpe J.E. 1993. Temperature-dependent switch between diurnal and nocturnal foraging in salmon // Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. V. 252. P. 135. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1993.0057
  39. Gisbert E., Williot P. 1997. Larval behavior and effect of the timing of initial feeding on growth and survival of siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baeri) larvae under small scale hatchery production // Aquaculture. V. 156. Iss. 1–2. P. 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(97)00086-0
  40. Heggenes J., Alfredsen K., Bustos A.A. et al. 2018. Be cool: A review of hydro-physical changes and fish responses in winter in hydropower-regulated northern streams // Environ. Biol. Fish. V. 101. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-017-0677-z
  41. Koporikov A.R., Bogdanov V.D. 2019. Burbot (Lota lota L., 1758) larval distribution in the streamflow during long downstream migration // Russ. J. Ecol. V. 50. № 5. P. 482. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413619050060
  42. Madsen B.L. 1969. Reactions of Brachyptera risi (Morton) (Plecoptera) nymphs to water current // Oikos. V. 20. № 1. P. 95. https://doi.org/10.2307/3543748
  43. Malmqvist B. 1988. Downstream drift in madeiran levadas: tests of hypotheses relating to the influence of predators on the drift of insects // Aquat. Insects. V. 10. Iss. 3. P. 141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650428809361323
  44. Matter W.J., Hopwood A.J. 1980. Vertical distribution of invertebrate drift in a large river // Limnol., Oceanogr. V. 25. № 6. P. 1117. https://doi.org/10.4319/LO.1980.25.6.1117
  45. McLay C.L. 1968. A study of drift in the Kakanui River, New Zealand // Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. V. 19. № 2. P. 139. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9680139
  46. McLay C.L. 1970. A theory concerning the distance travelled by animals entering the drift of a stream // J. Fish Res. Board Can. V. 27. № 2. P. 359. https://doi.org/10.1139/f70-041
  47. McNair J.N., Newbold J.D., Hart D.D. 1997. Turbulent transport of suspended particles and dispersing benthic organisms: how long to hit bottom? // J. Theor. Biol. V. 188. Iss. 1. P. 29. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1997.0453
  48. Müller-Haeckel A., Marvanová L. 1979. Periodicity of aquatic hyphomycetes in the subarctic // Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. V. 73. Iss. 1. P. 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(79)80080-7
  49. Naman S.M., Rosenfeld J.S., Richardson J.S. 2016. Causes and consequences of invertebrate drift in running waters: from individuals to populations and trophic fluxes // Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. V. 73. P. 1292. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2015-0363
  50. Oldmeadow D.F., Lancaster J., Rice S.P. 2010. Drift and settlement of stream insects in a complex hydraulic environment // Freshwater Biol. V. 55. Iss. 5. P. 1020. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02338.x
  51. Statzner B., Gore J.A., Resh V.H. 1988. Hydraulic stream ecology: observed patterns and potential applications // J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. V. 7. № 4. P. 307. https://doi.org/10.2307/1467296
  52. Townsend C.R. 1989. The patch dynamics concept of stream community ecology // J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. V. 8. № 1. P. 36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1467400
  53. Valdimarsson S.K., Metcalfe N.B. 1998. Shelter selection in juvenile Atlantic salmon, or why do salmon seek shelter in winter? // J. Fish Biol. V. 52. Iss. 1. P. 42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb01551.x
  54. Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cummins K.W. et al. 1980. The river continuum concept // Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. V. 37. № 1. P. 130. https://doi.org/10.1139/f80-017
  55. Weissenberger J., Spatz H.-Ch., Emanns A., Schwoerbel J. 1991. Measurement of lift and drag forces in the mN range experienced by benthic arthropods at flow velocities below 1.2 m s‒1 // Freshwater Biol. V. 25. Iss. 1. P. 21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1991.tb00469.x

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2.

Download (1MB)
3.

Download (903KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 М.В. Астахов

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies