Utopia as the Futurization of History: Discourse Aspects
- Authors: Paniotova T.S.1, Romanenko M.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Southern Federal University
- Issue: Vol 35, No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 117-131
- Section: Symbols. Values. Ideals
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0236-2007/article/view/263537
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0236200724040072
- ID: 263537
Abstract
In modern utopian studies, the distinction between utopia as an intention and utopia as a narrative is no longer in doubt. Beginning with Alexander Sventokhovsky and Ernst Bloch, utopia has been interpreted as a dream, a universal dimension of culture, a spiritual landmark, or a desire that is capable of giving meaning to human existence. The paper shows that although the traces of utopia as a dream for a better world are lost in the depths of history, it acquired its current outlines only in the modern era, when it received a stable conjunction with the future. The spiritual prerequisites were formed by Western secularization. As a result of the decomposition of the Christian vision of history, which placed paradise in a transcendent dimension, the entire symbolic worldview of medieval society was challenged, and the former eschatological expectations of salvation were embodied in new utopian forms. The essence of utopia is the earthly perfection of the world at the hands of man himself. The subsequent flourishing of utopia, associated with the inclusion of the time factor in it, was determined by large-scale socio-cultural transformations, fascination with the idea of progress, and the formation of historical consciousness. Hence, utopia turned from a “place that does not exist” into a “place that does not exist yet” (Ernst Bloch). The authors’ appeal to the concept of Karl Manheim made it possible to show that in various historical extensions and derivations of utopia, its relation to time developed in various ways – from the chiliastic dissolution of the future in the present to the socialist-communist subordination of the present to the future (futurization of history). Both forms have retained their vitality to the present day, although the futurization of history on a global scale has failed. Going through crisis, utopia continues to live in culture, because, with its (im)possibility, it gives history goals and ideals, as well nourishes hope for their achieving in the future.
Full Text

About the authors
Taisiya S. Paniotova
Southern Federal University
Author for correspondence.
Email: tspaniotova@sfedu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2529-9216
D. Sc. in Philosophy, Professor at the Institute of Philosophy and Social and Political Studies
Russian Federation, Rostov-on-DonMaxim A. Romanenko
Southern Federal University
Email: mromanenko@sfedu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6018-767X
C. Sc. in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Institute of Tourism, Service and Creative Industries
Russian Federation, Rostov-on-DonReferences
- Ainsa F. Utopiya: al’ternativnye modeli i formy kul’turnogo samovyrazheniya v Latinskoi Amerike. Novye osnovy utopii “iz” i “dlya” Latinskoi Ameriki [Utopia: Counter Culture and Latin American Creativity. New Basis for a Utopia “from” and “for” Latin America]. Latinskaya Amerika. 2012. N 8. P. 77–88.
- Bloch E. Tyubingenskoe vvedenie v filosofiyu [The Tübingen Introduction in Philosophy]. Ekaterinburg: Ural Univ. Publ., 1997.
- Bulgakov S.N. Dva grada:Issledovanya o prirode obshchestvennich idealov [Two Hail: A Study on the Nature of Social Ideals.]. Saint-Petersburg: RKhGI Publ, 1997.
- Jameson F. Politika utopii [The Politics of Utopia]. Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal. 2011. N 84. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://moscowartmagazine.com/issue/13/article/173 (date of access: 20.03.2022).
- Zheltikova I.V. Obraz budushchego [Image of the Future]. Orel: Kartush Publ., 2021.
- Eagleton T. Ubezhishche v bure istorii [A Shelter in the Tempest of History]. Skepsis. Nauchno-prosvetitel’skii zhurnal. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://scepsis.net/library/id_1664.html?ysclid=lsuxx4hc1z834151071 (date of access: 20.02. 2024).
- Kant I. Sobraniye sochineniy: v 8 t. [Collected works: in 8 vol.], ed. by prof. A.V. Gulyga. Vol. 7. Moscow: CHORO Publ., 1994.
- Koselleck R. «Prostranstvo opyta» i «gorizont ozhidanii» — dve istoricheskie kategorii [The “Space of Experience” and the “Horizon of Expectations” — Two Historical Categories]. Sotsiologiya vlasti. 2016. Vol. 28, N 2. P. 149–173.
- Mannheim K. Ideologiya i utopiya [Ideology and Utopia], transl. by M.I. Levina. Mannheim K. Diagnoz nashego vremeni [The Diagnosis of Our Time]. Moscow: Yurist Publ., 1994. P. 7–276.
- Pavlov A.V. Utopiya v noveishem zapadnom marksizme: anomaliya, nadezhda, nauka [Utopia in the Recent Western Marxism: Anomaly, Hope, Science]. Voprosy filosofii. 2021. N 9. P. 25–36.
- Paniotova T.S. Miry utopii:izbrannye trudy [Worlds of Utopia: Selected Works]. Rostov-on-Don–Taganrog: Southern Federal University, 2022.
- Paniotova T.S. Ontologiya utopii: konstruirovanie voobrazhaemogo prostranstva [The Ontology of Utopia: Construction of Imaginary Space]. Nauchnaya mysl’ Kavkaza. 2023. N 3(115). P. 14–21.
- Romanenko M.A. Voobrazhaya budushchee: proshloe v utopicheskom izmerenii [Imagining the Future: the Past in Utopian Dimension]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv. 2020. N 3(95). P. 35–43.
- Saint-Simon K.A. Izbrannye sochineniya: v 2 t. [Selected works: in 2 vol.], transl. from French and notes by L.S. Tsetlin, afterw. by V.P. Volgin. Vol. 2. Moscow; Leningrad: AN SSSR Publ., 1948.
- Sventokhovsky A. Istoriya utopii [The History of Utopia]. Moscow: V.M. Sablin, 1910.
- Fukuyama F. Konets istorii? [The End of History?]. Voprosy filosofii. 1990. N 3. P. 134–148.
- Bloch E. The Principle of Hope, trans. by N. Plaice, St. Plaice and P. Knight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
- Cerutti Guldberg H. De varia utópica. Ensayos de utopía (III). Bogotá: Publicaciones Universidad Central, 1989.
- Friberg A. Disrupting the Present and Opening the Future: Extinction Rebellion, Fridays for Future, and the Disruptive Utopian Method. Utopian Studies. 2022. Vol. 33, N 1. P. 1–17.
- Koselleck R. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.
- Levitas R. Utopia as Method: The Imaginary Reconstitution of Society. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
- Polak F. The image of the future. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publ. Comp, 1973.
- Servier J. La Utopía. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1995.
- Stainforth E. Excavating the Future: Utopia as a Method of Historical Analysis. Utopian Studies. 2021. Vol. 32, N 3. P. 598–612.
- Tillich P. Critique and Justification of Utopia. Manuel F. E. (ed.) Utopias and Utopian Thought. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971. P. 296–309.
