The Virtue Ethics Anthropological Turn: Reactualization of Aristotle's Ethics in the Second Half of the 20th Century

封面

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article examines the specifics of the virtue ethics as an anthropological turn in the moral philosophy of the 20th century based on Aristotle's ethics ideas. The article sets a goal to show the specificity of borrowing these ideas determined the virtue ethics thematic development direction in conceptualizing the moral assessment of human activity, but it also became the cause of the main conceptual difficulty (problematization of human nature), it has not been overcome. The article provides an analytical review of the main works of the most significant representatives of the virtue ethics, reconstructs the approaches developed in the works to the conceptualization of moral evaluation of human activity and establishes the role of Aristotle's ideas in the approaches. It is shown the appeal to Aristotle's philosophy primarily occurs when developing a method for determining the moral content of an action in a specific situation, where the application of a universal rule should be supplemented by many conditions of this situation, as well as when trying to return the motive and personal qualities to the description of the conditions. The latter also entails the conceptualization of personal qualities as a moral state of a person, correlated with his development (in possibility — by nature, in reality — in interaction with other people). It is concluded that the virtue ethics borrowed Aristotle's ideas in fragments and without a deep analysis of his philosophy. As a result, the problem of conceptualizing human nature was not solved, which would allow us to come to moral assessments of an act without appeal to a transcendental legislator or abstraction of duty. The achievements of ethics of virtue show: 1) it is impossible to selectively return individual concepts from the past to moral philosophy, but a comprehensive description of the phenomenon of morality in human activity is necessary, 2) the return of old concepts also brings back old problems of former moral theories (in the case of virtue, this is the problem of making a choice and forming a disposition).

作者简介

Roman Platonov

RAS Institute of Philosophy

ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2762-1328
12/1 Goncharnaya Str., 109240 Moscow, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Агальцев А.М. Аристотель о природе общения // Вестник Томского государственного университета. № 300(1). 2007. С. 39–42.
  2. Апресян Р.Г. Проблема Другого в философии Аристотеля // Этическая мысль. 2014. № 14. С. 65–85.
  3. Аристотель. Никомахова этика / Пер. Н.В. Брагинской // Аристотель. Соч.: в 4 т. Т. 4. Москва: Мысль, 1984. С. 53–294.
  4. Артемьева О.В. Добродетель и ответственность // Проблемы этики. Философско-этический альманах. № 5. 2015. С. 95–108.
  5. Артемьева О.В. Теоретические основания этики добродетели // Философия и этика. Сборник научных трудов к 70-летию академика РАН А.А.Гусейнова. Москва: Альфа-М, 2009. С. 433–445.
  6. Гегель Г.В.Ф. Лекции по истории философии. Книга вторая: История греческой философии // Гегель. Соч. в 14 т. Т. 10. Москва: Типография «Печатный двор», 1932.
  7. Гуторов В.А. Античная социальная утопия: вопросы истории и теории. Ленинград: Издательство Лениниградсткого университета, 1989. 288 с. Gutorov V.A. Antichnaya sotsial'naya utopiya: voprosy istorii i teorii [Ancient social utopia: questions of history and theory]. Leningrad: Leningrad University Publ., 1989.
  8. Дмитриев Т.А. Аласдер Макинтайр: мораль после добродетели // История философии. № 12. 2005. С. 89–123.
  9. Хабермас Ю. Между натурализмом и религией. Философские статьи / пер. М.Б. Скуратова. Москва: Весь мир, 2011.
  10. Хабермас Ю. Моральное сознание и коммуникативное действие / пер. Д.В. Скляднева. Санкт-Петербург: Наука, 2001.
  11. Эдмондс Д. Убили бы вы толстяка? Задача о вагонетке: что такое хорошо и что такое плохо? / пер. Д. Кралечкина. Москва: Институт Гайдара, 2016.. Edmonds D. Ubili by vy tolstyaka? Zadacha o vagonetke: chto takoe khorosho i chto takoe plokho? [Would you kill a fat man? The trolley problem: what is good and what is bad?], transl. by D. Kralechkin. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ., 2016.
  12. Aristoteles. Die Nikomachische Ethik. Griechisch-Deutsch, Üb. von O. Gigon. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2007.
  13. Audi R. Epistemic Virtue and Justified Belief. Virtue epistemology. Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Р. 82–97.
  14. Buckle S. Aristotle's Republic or, Why Aristotle's Ethics Is Not Virtue Ethics, Philosophy. 2002. N 77. Р. 565–595.
  15. Crisp R. Modern Moral Philosophy and the Virtues. How One Should Live? Essays on the Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. N 9. P. 1–18.
  16. Foot Ph. Virtues and vices and other essays in moral philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. Р. 1–18.
  17. Habermas J. Öffentlicher Raum und politische Öffentlichkeit. Lebensgeschichtliche Wurzeln von zwei Gedankenmotiven. Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion. Philosophische Aufsätze. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2009. S. 15–26.
  18. Macintyre A. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.
  19. Newman W. L. The Politics of Aristotle. In 4 vol. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1887.
  20. Nussbaum M.C. “Finely Aware and Richly Responsible”: Literature and the Moral Imagination. Love’s Knowledge. Essays on Philosophy and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. P. 148–167.
  21. Nussbaum M.C. The Discernment of Perception: An Aristotelian Conception of Private and Public Rationality. Love’s Knowledge. Essays on Philosophy and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. P. 54–105.
  22. Nussbaum M.C. The Fragility of Goodness. Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press 2000.
  23. Nussbaum M.C. Virtue Ethics: a Misleading Category? The Journal of Ethics. 1999. N 3. Р. 163–201.
  24. Roche T.D. On the Alleged Metaphysical Foundation of Aristotle’s Ethics. Ancient Philosophy. 1988. Vol. 8 (1). P. 49–62.
  25. Swanson Ju.A., David C.C. Aristotle’s Politics. A Reader’s Guide. London; New York: Continuum, 2009.
  26. Winter М. Rethinking Virtue Ethics. Heidelberg; London; New York: Springer, 2012. 183 р.

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024

##common.cookie##