MgO STABILITY IN EUTECTIC Li 2 CO 3 –Na 2 CO 3  AND Li 2 CO 3 –K 2 CO 3

A. S. Tolkacheva; Толкачева А. С.; M. А. Konopel’ko; Конопелько М. А.

doi:10.31857/S0235010623010097

MgO STABILITY IN EUTECTIC Li₂CO₃–Na₂CO₃ AND Li₂CO₃–K₂CO₃

作者: Tolkacheva A.¹, Konopel’ko M.¹
隶属关系:
1. Institute of High-Temperature Electrochemistry, UB RAS
期: 编号 1 (2023)
页面: 59-67
栏目: Articles
URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0235-0106/article/view/138533
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0235010623010097
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HEDRVF
ID: 138533

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取

##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问

订阅存取

详细
作者简介
参考
补充文件
统计

详细

Research and technology studies on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells (MCFC) are being directed at improving their performance in mode of greenhouse gas conversion for chemical energy storage. The changes in gas composition feeding MCFC demand new insulating materials to be found. In the current work, the equilibrium solubility of magnesia ceramics in air in contact with Li₂CO₃–Na₂CO₃ and Li₂CO₃–K₂CO₃ eutectic mixtures was measured at 600°С. The study shows that magnesia is completely stable in the tested melts for at least more than 270 h. Its solubility was found to increase in Li–K carbonate eutectic. Conclusions about the material stability are based on results of inductively coupled plasma atomic absorption spectroscopy of melts and scanning electron microscopy combined with X-ray diffraction employed to ceramics testing. Magnesia is recommended as an insulating material in electrolysis cells containing Li₂CO₃–Na₂CO₃ and Li₂CO₃–K₂CO₃ carbonate eutectics for the conversion of the greenhouse gas in chemical energy storage devices operating in air.

关键词

MgO, insulators, fuel cells, microstructure, eutectic, carbonate

作者简介

A. Tolkacheva

Institute of High-Temperature Electrochemistry, UB RAS

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: a.s.tolkacheva@urfu.ru
Russia, Yekaterinburg

M. Konopel’ko

Institute of High-Temperature Electrochemistry, UB RAS

Email: a.s.tolkacheva@urfu.ru
Russia, Yekaterinburg

参考

Hamad T.A., Agll A.A., Hamad Y.M., Bapat S., Thomas M., Martin K. B., Sheffield J. W. // Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2013. 1. P. 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2013.09.001
Lan R., Tao S. // Sci. Adv. 2016. 2. e1600772. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600772
Discepoli G. Cinti G., Desideri U., Penchini D., Proietti S. // Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 2012. 9. P. 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.05.002
Carapellucci R., Cipollone R., Battista D.D. // Energy Procedia. 2017. 126. P. 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.228
Antolini Е. // Ceram. Int. 2013. 39. P. 3463–3478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.10.236
Terada S., Higaki K., Nagashima I., Ito Y. // J. Power Sources. 1999. 83. P. 227–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00282-7
Celman J. R., Maru H. C. Advances in molten salt chemistry, vol. 4, Mamantov G., Braustein J. Ed., N.Y., Plenum. 1981. P. 159.
Kaplan V., Bendikov T., Feldman Y., Gartsman K., Wachtel E., Lubomirsky I. // J. Power Sources. 2016. 301. P. 271–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.125
Mizuhata M., Harada Y., Cha G., Bienvenu Béléké A., Deki S. // J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004. 151. № 5. E179–E185. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1688798
Gao W., Zhou T., Gao Y., Louis B., O’Hare D., Wang Q. // J. Energy Chem. 2017. 26. P. 830–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2017.06.005
Zhang K., Li X.S., Li W.Z., Rohatgi A., Duan Y., Singh P., Li L., King D.L. // Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 2014. 1. P. 1400030. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201400030
Velden P.F. // Trans. Faraday Soc. 1967. 63. P. 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1039/TF9676300175
Zakir’yanova I.D. // J. Applied Spectroscopy. 2018. 85. № 4. P. 611–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10812-018-0694-5
Fedorov P.P., Tkachenko Ye.A., Kuznetsov S.V., Voronov V.V., Lavrishchev S.V. Polucheniye nanochastits MgO [Preparation of MgO nanoparticles] // Neorganicheskiye materialy. 2007. 43. № 5. P. 574–576. [In Russian].