Denmark: portfolio allocation in the government and parliament in the sphere of foreign policy

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The growing number of coalition governments in European states, many of which are minority governments, raises questions about how they form and function. The case of Denmark, where such governments have long become a part of political everyday life, helps to identify the main specific features of foreign policy portfolio allocation in the cabinet and the Danish parliament, since the Kingdom is one of the most successful examples of cooperation between the government and parliament in the field of foreign policy and defence. The article analyses the mechanisms and factors for the foreign policy portfolio allocation in 2001-2023, taking into account successive "blue" and "red" party blocs. Various theories of coalition formation and portfolio allocation in coalition governments are used to explain the distinguishing features of such allocation at a particular historical stage. In addition, general features of the development of the Danish political system at the present stage, the main trends and prospects for this development are considered. The authors conclude that when allocating portfolios in the government, preference is given to "junior" coalition partners, while in parliament - to "senior" ones; the opinion of the Danish People's Party is taken into account by coalition partners without the Party’s inclusion in the government; the choice is given in favour of popular and authoritative politicians constituting the foreign policy elite of Denmark over the past three decades; the functioning of the Foreign Policy Committee provides some kind of balance of power in the Danish Parliament on foreign and defence policy. It is also found out that the strategies for coalition formation and foreign policy portfolio allocation do not significantly differ between the "blue" and "red" party blocs, but follow the same logic aimed at maintaining the stability of the minority government’s position.

Sobre autores

Oxana Grigoreva

Saint Petersburg State University

Email: oxana.grigorjeva@gmail.com
Saint Petersburg, Russia

Nikita Plyusnin

Saint Petersburg State University

Email: n.plyusnin@spbu.ru
Saint Petersburg, Russia

Bibliografia

  1. Исаев М.А. (2002) Основы конституционного права Дании. Муравей, Москва. 344 с.
  2. Могунова М.А. (2001) Скандинавский парламентаризм: теория и практика. РГГУ, Москва. 350 с.
  3. Плевако Н.С. (2019) Парламентские выборы в Дании. Научно-аналитический вестник ИЕ РАН. № 3(9). С. 42-48. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran320194247
  4. Швейцер В.Я. (отв. ред.) (2020) Коалиционные правительства в современной Европе: шансы и риски. Институт Европы РАН, Москва. 136 с. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/report72020_374
  5. Bassi A. (2017) Policy Preferences in Coalition Formation and the Stability of Minority and Surplus Governments. Journal of Politics. Vol. 79. No. 1. P. 250-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/687928
  6. Green-Pedersen C., Kosiara-Pedersen K. (2020) The Party System: Open yet Stable. The Oxford Handbook of Danish Politics. Ed. by P.M. Christiansen, J. Elklit, P. Nedergaard. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. P. 212-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198833598.001.0001
  7. Hansen M.E. (2019) Distributing chairs and seats in committees: A parliamentary perspective. Parliamentary Affairs. Vol. 72. Issue 1. P. 202-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsy008
  8. Hansen M.E. (2020) The Government and the Prime Minister: More than Primus Inter Pares. The Oxford Handbook of Danish Politics. Ed. by P.M. Christiansen, J. Elklit, P. Nedergaard. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. P. 107-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198833598.001.0001
  9. Jensen J.A. (2001) Folketinget og udenrigspolitikken. Parlamentarismen - hvem tog magten? Ed. by G.T. Nielsen. Aarhus Universitetsforlag, Aarhus, Denmark. Р. 117-146.
  10. Konig T., Lin N. (2021) Portfolio allocation patterns and policy-making effectiveness in minority coalition governments. European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 60. Issue 3. P. 694-715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12416
  11. Oppermann K., Brummer K. (2020). Who Gets What in Foreign Affairs? Explaining the Allocation of Foreign Ministries in Coalition Governments. Government and Opposition. Vol. 55. Issue 2. P. 241-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.19
  12. Strom K. (1990) Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 304 p.
  13. Vestermark Kober J. (2022) Det lille systemskifte. 100 Danmarkshistorier. Aarhus Universitetsforlag, Aarhus, Denmark. 100 p.

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies