German Agricultural Policy in the Context of Geopolitical Shocks and the Environmental Agenda
- Autores: Mitrofanov S.V1, Ivanova A.K2
-
Afiliações:
- Higher School of Economics
- Institute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciences
- Edição: Nº 6 (134) (2025)
- Páginas: 166-178
- Seção: PROBLEMS OF ECONOMY
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0201-7083/article/view/357493
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S3034599525060130
- ID: 357493
Citar
Resumo
This article investigates the transformation of Germany's agricultural policy and its agricultural sector from 2015 to 2025 under the impact of multiple global crises: the COVID19 pandemic, the Special Military Operation (SVO), sanctions pressure, and climate challenges. Through comprehensive institutional analysis combining quantitative and qualitative methods, the study examines the sequence of sectoral support measures, evolving patterns of agricultural land use, and changing practices in fertilizer and pesticide application, all confirming the systemic nature of this transformation. By synthesizing policy measures and sector responses, the authors identify a paradigm shift in Germany's agricultural policy - from stable production support under the EU's Common Agricultural Policy toward an adaptation regime focused on ensuring food security and technological autonomy. The research demonstrates that external shocks served as catalysts for significant sector changes: accelerated digitalization, diversification of fertilizer and energy supply chains, and increased protest activity among agricultural business associations. The adaptation to new economic conditions incurred substantial costs: rising production expenses, social resistance from farmers, and persistent dependence on alternative markets. Analysis of the German experience reveals structural vulnerabilities within the agricultural sector under conditions of instability. The authors present development forecasts: a conservative scenario projecting continued geopolitical tensions, slowed ecological transition, and moderate support growth, leading to stagnation and maintained social tension; and a more probable moderate (baseline) scenario anticipating logistics stabilization, partial regulatory relief, and moderate investment growth that would balance environmental and economic objectives.
Palavras-chave
Sobre autores
S. Mitrofanov
Higher School of Economics
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: f-mitrofanoff2015@yandex.ru
Moscow, Russia
A. Ivanova
Institute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: annaivanova@instituteofeurope.ru
Moscow, Russia
Bibliografia
- Германия. 2024. (2025) Под. ред. Белова В.Б. Доклады ИЕ РАН, Москва. 204 с. http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/report12025_418/
- Белов В.Б. (2024) Вызовы для конкурентоспособности германского хозяйственно-политического пространства. Современная Европа. № 6. С. 79-88.
- Хорольская М.В. (2023) Продовольственная безопасность Германии в условиях кризиса. Современная Европа. № 5. С. 57-71.
- Фрумкин Б.Е. (2024) Общая сельскохозяйственная политика (декабрь 2023 - февраль 2024). Европейский Союз: факты и комментарии. № 115. С. 34-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/eufacts120243440.
- Фрумкин Б.Е. (2024а) Фермерские протесты в странах Центрально-Восточной Европы: причины и последствия. АПК: экономика, управление. № 6. С. 109-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.33305/246-109.
- Sotte F., Arcuri S. (2025). The CAP 2014-2020. In: Sotte, F., Brunori, G. (eds) European Agricultural Policy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-83313-7_9.
- Baaken M.C. (2022) Sustainability of agricultural practices in Germany: a literature review along multiple environmental domains. Regional Environmental Change. Vol. 22. P. 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-022-01892-5.
- Rasche L., Steinhauser J. (2022) How will an increase in organic agricultural area affect land use in Germany? Organic Agriculture. Vol. 12. P. 513-530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-022-00405-2.
- McEvoy O., Plaumann L. (2025) Seasonal Labour Migration to Germany: the structural role of seasonal work in the German agricultural sector. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/8thxd_v1.
- Рахимов А.М., Тлеубаев А.Б., Ержигитов Е.С. (2022) Корректировка курса аграрной политики Европейского Союза на примере Федеративной Республики Германия. Проблемы агрорынка. № 3. С. 46-54. https://doi.org/10.46666/2022-3.2708-9991.05.
- Georgieva V., Guerov G., Blagoeva N. (2024) Impact of economic and environmental factors on agricultural product pricing in the EU. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal. Vol. 10. № 4. P. 47-73. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2024.10.04.03.
- Veselinović M., Stanojević Dimovski J., Gashi D. (2025) The Perspective of Gas Distribution from the Russian Federation on the World Market. Journal of Process Management and New Technologies. Vol. 13, No. 1-2. P. 14-27. https://doi.org/10.5937/jpmnt13-56387.
- Ciechanowski W., Maciejczak M. (2025) Institutional Conditions for the Development of Agricultural Biogas Plants as Part of the Bioeconomy Sector in Germany. Annals of the Polish Association of Agricultural and Agribusiness Economists. Vol. 27, № 2. P. 23-36. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0055.0757.
- Maruejols L., Höschle L., Yu X. (2025) Energy independence, rural sustainability and potential of bioenergy villages in Germany: machine learning perspectives.International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. Vol. 28, № 2. P. 263-295. https://doi.org/10.22434/ifamr1132
- Папаскири Т.В., Митрофанов С.В., Орлова Н.B., Сошников А.Ю., Шевчук А.А. (2024) Анализ структуры посевных площадей стран Европейского союза с концепции устойчивого земледелия. Германия. Аграрная наука. № 2. С. 146-152. https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-379-2-146-152.
- Митрофанов С.В., Серова Е.В., Орлова Н.В. (2024) Влияние применения удобрений на баланс основных элементов питания и эмиссию парниковых газов в Германии. Агрохимия. № 5. С. 54-63. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002188124050078.
Arquivos suplementares

