German Policy Towards China

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article is devoted to Germany's policy towards China. China displaced Germany from its first place in the world in terms of exports of goods in 2008. The late 2000s marked the lowest point in relations between Germany and China. Nevertheless, in the 2010s, the German government, understanding the economic potential of relations with China, promoted the development and strengthening of relations with China, defining them as a “strategic partnership”. Such a turn in German policy occurred under the same chancellor – A. Merkel. However, the risks associated with Germany's dependence on Chinese strategic materials supplies, the espionage possibility, as well as different positions on anti-Russian sanctions made the Olaf Scholz government approach towards China tougher than the “strategic partnership” policy under A. Merkel. The article analyzes the evolution of German policy towards China, the approaches of various political powers in Germany to China, as well as the measures of the German government for “de-risking” China policy. The author gives an answer to the question whether “strategic partnership” between Germany and China in the 2010s corresponds the actual situation. Conclusions are drawn about the impact of various factors on German policy towards China, including the government, political parties, and interest groups, as well as the complexity of international relations.

About the authors

F. A Basov

National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO)

Email: fabasov2@mail.ru
Candidate of Sciences (Politics), Senior Researcher Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Белов В.Б. (2023) Германо-китайские экономические отношения в условиях актуальных геополитических вызовов. Современная Европа. № 7. С. 111‒126. doi: 10.31857/S0201708323070094
  2. Белов В.Б. (2024a) Отношения ФРГ с КНР: непростое триединство партнерства, конкуренции и соперничества. Актуальные проблемы Европы. № 4. С. 199‒222. doi: 10.31249/ape/2024.04.11
  3. Белов В.Б. (отв. ред.) (2024b) Германия. 2023. ИЕ РАН, Москва. 194 с. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/report22024_408
  4. Буторина О.В. (2023). Торговля Евросоюза с Китаем: проблема дефицита. Современная Европа. № 7. С. 5‒20. doi: 10.31857/S020170832307001X
  5. Литвак Н.В., Помозова Н.Б. (2021) Концептуальные подходы к правам человека в Европейском союзе и КНР. Современная Европа. № 5. С. 56‒67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope520215667
  6. Heberer T., Senz A. (2007) Die deutsche Chinapolitik. Deutsche Außenpolitik. Sicherheit, Wohlfahrt, Institutionen und Normen. Ed. by T. Jäger, A. Höse, K. Oppermann. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden, Germany. P. 673–692. doi: 10.1007/978-3-531-93024-4
  7. Sandschneider E. (2005) Anleitung zur Drachenpflege: vom Umgang des Westens mit dem schwierigen Partner China. Internationale Politik. Vol. 60. Issue 12. P. 6‒13.
  8. Sandschneider E. (2007) Globale Rivalen. Chinas unheimlicher Aufstieg und die Ohnmacht des Westens. Hanser, München, Germany. 258 p.
  9. Sandschneider E. (ed.) (1999) The Study of Modern China. Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK. 304 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).