SOVREMENNAYa INNOVATsIONNAYa POLITIKA, ORIENTIROVANNAYa NA MISSII (primer Germanii)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

New trends in global economic development, such as the processes of transnationalisation, economic and energy crises, gaps in foreign trade and logistics chains, challenges of modern technological development, intensify the competition of companies in world markets. The governments of the developed countries and large multinational corporations are actively engaged in radical transformation of the modern social and economic world development model on the basis of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Germany is at the forefront of this global agenda. According to the German government, the development and introduction of transformative innovations is one of the tools that brings the world closer to sustainable development model. Such innovations do not only lead to technical progress, but also solve important social problems. To force through rapid modernisation German government has chosen a time-tested method – mission-oriented innovation policy (MOIP). State becomes the leading actor of the national innovation system, setting the goals of technological development and mobilising economic resources required to achieve these goals. For the first time, the missions of innovation policy were formalised in government documents in 2018. In early 2023 the new German government updated the drafting and composition of the missions. This article discusses the theoretical foundations of the MOIP approach to the formation of government innovation policy, describes the missions of the innovation policy of Germany, approved in 2018 and 2023, and examines the practical results of the implementation of some missions in 2018‒2022 on the example of renewable energy technologies introduction, building up battery cell production in Germany, developing clean mobility, putting German indigenous artificial intelligence technologies into practical application, digital healthcare, creating sustainable circular economies.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

D. E Bukshnaitis

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: denisnn777@gmail.com
Post-graduate student Moscow, Russia

V. A Zubenko

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: vzoubenko@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8341-8896
Candidate of Sciences (Economic), Docent Moscow, Russia

A. V Frolov

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: vamik@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-1808-4620
Doctor of Sciences (Economic), Docent Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Белов В.Б. (2022) Итоги 2022 г.: экономический штандорт Германии на грани деинду стриализации? Научно-аналитический вестник ИЕ РАН. № 6. С. 70‒84. doi: 10.15211/vestnikieran620227084
  2. Зубенко В.В., Зубенко В.А., Сунь Ю. (2023) Российско-китайское сотрудничество в области цифровых технологий. Гуманитарные науки. Вестник Финансового университе та. Научно-практический журнал. Т. 13. № 3. C. 86–93. doi: 10.26794/2226-7867-2023 13-3-86-93
  3. Botthof A., Edler J., Hahn K., Hirsch-Kreinsen H., Weber M., Wessels J. (2020) Transfor mation des Innovationssystems: Neue Anforderungen an die Innovationspolitik. Discussion Pa pers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis. No. 67. 28 p. doi: 10.24406/publica-fhg-300570
  4. Bratan T., Schneider D., Heyen N., Pullmann L., Friedewald M., Kuhlmann D., Brkic N., Bärbel Hüsing B. (2022) E-Health in Deutschland. Entwicklungsperspektiven und internationa ler Vergleich. Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI), Karlsruhe, Germany. 119 p. doi: 10.24406/publica-fhg-416796
  5. Ergas H. (1987) Does Technology Policy Matter? Technology and Global Industry: Com panies and Nations in the World Economy. Ed. by B. Guile, H. Brooks. National Academy Press, Washington, USA. P. 191‒280.
  6. Feser D. (2022) Innovationspolitik in der neuen Legislaturperiode: eine neue strategische Ausrichtung? Wirtschaftsdienst. Heft 6. P. 465–469 URL: https://www.wirtschaftsdienst.eu/inhalt/jahr/2022/heft/6/beitrag/innovationspolitik-in-der neuen-legislaturperiode-eine-neue-strategische-ausrichtung.html (accessed: 13.07.2023).
  7. Foray D., Mowery D., Nelson R. (2012) Public R&D and social challenges: What lessons from mission R&D programs? Research Policy. No. 41. P. 1697‒1702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.011
  8. Gassler H., Polt W., Rammer C. (2006) Schwerpunktsetzung in der Forschungs und Tech nologiepolitik ‒ eine Analyse der Paradigmenwechsel seit 1945. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft. No. 1. P. 7–23.
  9. Kattel R., Mazzucato M. (2018) Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabili ties in the public sector. Industrial and Corporate Change. No. 27. P. 787‒801.
  10. Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R., Martin B.R. (2010) Technology policy and global warming: Why new policy models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles won’t work). Re search Policy. Vol. 39. Issue 8. P. 1011‒1023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.008
  11. Robinson D., Mazzucato M. (2019) The evolution of mission-oriented policies: Exploring changing market creating policies in the US and European space sector. Research Policy. Vol. 48. Issue 4. P. 936–948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.005
  12. Roth F., Lindner R., Hufnagl M., Wittmann F., Yorulmaz M. (2021) Lehren für künftige missionsorientierte Innovationspolitiken. Abschlussbericht der wissenschaftlichen Begleitfor schung zur deutschen Hightech-Strategie ‒ Band 1. Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe, Germany. 53 p. doi: 10.24406/publica-225
  13. Rusche C., Demary V., Goecke H., Kohlisch E., Mertens A., Scheufen M., Wendt J. (2022) KI-Monitor 2022: Künstliche Intelligenz in Deutschland. Bundesverband Digitale Wirtschaft (BVDW) e.V., Berlin, Germany. 52 p.
  14. Wilts H. (2022) Germany´s Transformation Towards a Circular Economy. Heinrich Böll Stiftung Tel Aviv. 19.04. URL: https://il.boell.org/en/2022/04/19/germanys-transformation towards-circular-economy (accessed: 20.02.2023).
  15. Yorulmaz M. (2021) Missionsorientierte Innovationspolitik. Von der Ambition zur erfolg reichen Umsetzung. Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe, Germany. 37 p.
  16. Belov V.B. (2022) Itogi 2022 g.: ekonomicheskij shtandort Germanii na grani deindu strializacii? [Results of 2022: German economy on the verge of deindustrialisation?], Nauchno analiticheskij vestnik IE RAN, 30(6), pp. 70‒84. doi: 10.15211/vestnikieran620227084 (In Rus sian).
  17. Botthof A., Edler J., Hahn K., Hirsch-Kreinsen H., Weber M., Wessels J. (2020) Transfor mation des Innovationssystems: Neue Anforderungen an die Innovationspolitik, Discussion Pa pers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, 67. doi: 10.24406/publica-fhg-300570
  18. Bratan T., Schneider D., Heyen N., Pullmann L., Friedewald M., Kuhlmann D., Brkic N., Bärbel Hüsing B. (2022) E-Health in Deutschland. Entwicklungsperspektiven und internationa ler Vergleich, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI), Karlsruhe, Germany. doi: 10.24406/publica-fhg-416796
  19. Ergas H. (1987) Does Technology Policy Matter?, in Guile B., Brooks H. (ed.) Technology and Global Industry: Companies and Nations in the World Economy, National Academy Press, Washington, USA, pp. 191‒280.
  20. Feser D. (2022) Innovationspolitik in der neuen Legislaturperiode: eine neue strategische Ausrichtung?, Wirtschaftsdienst, 6, pp. 465–469 URL: https://www.wirtschaftsdienst.eu/inhalt/jahr/2022/heft/6/beitrag/innovationspolitik-in-der neuen-legislaturperiode-eine-neue-strategische-ausrichtung.html (accessed: 13.07.2023).
  21. Foray D., Mowery D., Nelson R. (2012) Public R&D and social challenges: What lessons from mission R&D programs?, Research Policy, 41, pp. 1697‒1702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.011
  22. Gassler H., Polt W., Rammer C. (2006) Schwerpunktsetzung in der Forschungs und Tech nologiepolitik ‒ eine Analyse der Paradigmenwechsel seit 1945, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 1, pp. 7–23.
  23. Kattel R., Mazzucato M. (2018) Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabili ties in the public sector, Industrial and Corporate Change, 27, pp. 787‒801.
  24. Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R., Martin B.R. (2010) Technology policy and global warming: Why new policy models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles won’t work), Re search Policy, 39(8), pp. 1011‒1023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.008
  25. Robinson D., Mazzucato M. (2019) The evolution of mission-oriented policies: Exploring changing market creating policies in the US and European space sector, Research Policy, 48(4), pp. 936–948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.005
  26. Roth F., Lindner R., Hufnagl M., Wittmann F., Yorulmaz M. (2021) Lehren für künftige missionsorientierte Innovationspolitiken. Abschlussbericht der wissenschaftlichen Begleitfor schung zur deutschen Hightech-Strategie ‒ Band 1, Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe, Germany. doi: 10.24406/publica-225
  27. Rusche C., Demary V., Goecke H., Kohlisch E., Mertens A., Scheufen M., Wendt J. (2022) KI-Monitor 2022: Künstliche Intelligenz in Deutschland, Bundesverband Digitale Wirtschaft (BVDW) e.V., Berlin, Germany.
  28. Wilts H. (2022) Germany´s Transformation Towards a Circular Economy, Heinrich Böll Stiftung Tel Aviv, 19.04. URL: https://il.boell.org/en/2022/04/19/germanys-transformation towards-circular-economy (accessed: 20.02.2023).
  29. Yorulmaz M. (2021) Missionsorientierte Innovationspolitik. Von der Ambition zur erfolg reichen Umsetzung, Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe, Germany.
  30. Zubenko V.V., Zubenko V.A., Sun Yu. (2023) Rossijsko-kitajskoe sotrudnichestvo v oblasti cifrovyh tekhnologij. Gumanitarnye nauki [Russian-Chinese Cooperation in the Sphere of Digi tal Economy. Humanities and Social Sciences], Bulletin of the Financial University, 13(3), pp. 86‒93. https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-3-86-93 (In Russian).

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies