Monetization of emissions reductions in the EU in the context of carbon border adjustment mechanism

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

It is believed that the significant reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can be achieved by establishing a trading system of this specific product. In fact, the reduction of emissions is mainly due to decrease of production volumes and technological reasons, rather than organizational, institutional and fiscal factors. As shown in the article on the basis of correlation analysis, the reduction of GHG emissions in the steel and aluminum industries of the EU over the past two decades by an average of 95% is explained by a reduction in output in tons. The remaining 5% is related to technology improvements. In general, the efficiency of the EU Emissions Trading System for these industries is close to zero and comparable to a statistical error. At the same time, it is impossible to deny a certain effect of institutional factors, such as the climate agenda and public opinion. It is revealed that the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is necessary for the EU, first of all, as an additional source of revenue to the EU budget, and as a tool to strengthen its leadership role in the world climate policy and global geopolitical and information spaces.

Sobre autores

Vladimir Varnavskii

Primakov Institute of World Economy and International Relations Russian Academy of Sciences(IMEMO)

Email: varnavsky@imemo.ru
Moscow, Russia

Bibliografia

  1. Белов В.Б. (2021) Дебаты в ЕС о Механизме трансграничного углеродного регулирования. Европейский союз: факты и комментарии. № 103. С. 53-58. URL: http://aevis.ru/upload/ckeditor/files/103.pdf
  2. Гайда И., Доброславский Н., Ляшик Ю., Данеева Ю., Мельников Ю. (2021) Европейский механизм пограничной углеродной корректировки - ключевые вопросы и влияние на Россию. Центр энергетики Московской школы управления СКОЛКОВО, Сколково. 50 с. URL: https://energy.skolkovo.ru/downloads/documents/SEneC/SKOLKOVO_EneC_RU_CBAM.pdf (дата обращения: 26.07.2022)
  3. ИПЕМ (2021) Трансграничное углеродное регулирование в ЕС: как не допустить дискриминации российских экспортёров. Аналитический доклад. 52 с. URL: http://www.ipem.ru/files/20210531_ipem_doklad_polnyy_tekst.pdf
  4. Невская А.А., Баронина Ю.А. (2021) Трансграничное углеродное регулирование: новый контекст отношений России и ЕС. Современная Европа. № 6. С. 63-74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope620216374
  5. Cosbey A., Droege S., Fischer C., Munnings C. (2019) Developing Guidance for Implementing Border Carbon Adjustments: Lessons, Cautions, and Research Needs from the Literature. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. No. 13(1). P. 3-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rey020
  6. European Commission, Directorate-General for Budget (2017) Future financing of the EU: final report and recommendations of the High Level Group on Own Resources. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, Luxembourg. 101 p. DOI: doi/10.2761/36070
  7. Klemetsen M.E., Rosendahl K.E., Jakobsen A.L. (2020) The impacts of the EU ETS on Norwegian plants' environmental and economic performance. Climate Change Economics. Vol. 11. No. 1, рр. 1-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007820500062
  8. Osberghaus D., Heindl P., Sommerfeld K. and Höfling H. (2016) KfW/ZEW CO2 Barometer 2016 - Carbon Edition: How the EU ETS can contribute to meeting the ambitious targets of the Paris Agreement. KfW Bankengruppe, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 30 р.
  9. Römer D., Schwarz M., Liem E (2021) The EU's carbon border adjustment: A trade barrier or an opportunity for global climate action? KfW Research Focus on Economics. No. 345. 9 p.
  10. UNCTAD (2021) A European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Implications for developing countries. 30 р. URL: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/osginf2021d2_en.pdf (дата обращения: 26.07.2022)
  11. Zhong J., Pei J. (2022а) Beggar thy neighbor? On the competitiveness and welfare impacts of the EU's proposed carbon border adjustment mechanism. Energy Policy. Vol. 162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112802
  12. Zhong J., Pei J. (2022b) Border Carbon Adjustment: A Systematic Literature Review of Latest Developments. 23 р. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4128234

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies