The Kosovo problem: Serbia faces a decisive choice

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article concentrates on the agreements between Belgrade and Pristina reached on February 27, 2023 in Brussels, and on March 18, 2023 in Ohrid through mediation of the EU and the USA. It also traces the chronology of the process that led to the current result and discusses “The Agreement on the Path to Normalisation of Relations between Kosovo and Serbia” and the “Implementation Annex”. The analysis indicates the perception of the documents by society and political forces both in Kosovo and Serbia. Based on sociological surveys the study examines the attitude towards various ways of resolving the “Kosovo problem”, towards the EU, NATO, and Russia. It also draws attention to the change in the position of the influential Serbian Orthodox Church, and speculates on the reasons for this turn. The article makes an assumption regarding the future course of behavior of the leaders of Kosovo and Serbia along with representatives of the EU and the United States. Whether Serbia joins the anti-Russian sanctions is an open question. The choice should be made between interests and emotions, national mythology and material goods, tradition and the future. The Western push to further promote accession of Serbia to the EU in exchange for recognition of Kosovo's independence means essential revision of the national Serbian national identity. It is about a historical choice, which will require a corresponding response from Russia.

作者简介

Pavel Kandel

Institute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: xpekan@yandex.ru
Moscow, Russia

参考

  1. Вайнштейн Г.И. (2016) Электоральный фактор в эволюции партийного ландшафта Европы. Электоральные процессы в Европейском союзе (середина второго десятилетия XXI века). ИЕ РАН, Москва. С. 11-16.
  2. Искендеров П.А. (2015) Республика Косово // Центральная и Юго-Восточная Европа. Конец ХХ - начало ХХI вв. Аспекты общественно-политического развития. Историко-политологический справочник. Нестор-История, Москва, Санкт-Петербург. С. 456-466.
  3. Искендеров П.А. (2015) Сербия, Черногория и Албанский вопрос в начале XX века. Алетейя, Санкт-Петербург. 472 c.
  4. Кандель П.Е. (2021) Внеочередные парламентские выборы в Косово. Научно-аналитический вестник ИЕ РАН. № 1. С.134-141. doi: 10.15211/vestnikieran12021134141
  5. Кандель П.Е. (2022) Всеобщие выборы в Сербии. Научно-аналитический вестник ИЕ РАН. № 2. С. 80-89. doi: 10.15211/vestnikieran220228089
  6. Никифоров К.В. (2015) Республика Сербия // Центральная и Юго-Восточная Европа. Конец ХХ - начало ХХI вв. Аспекты общественно-политического развития. Историко-политологический справочник. Нестор-История, Москва, Санкт-Петербург. С. 456-466.
  7. Фукуяма Ф. (2019) Идентичность. Стремление к признанию и политика неприятия. Альпина Паблишер, Москва. 256 c.
  8. Энтина Е.Г. (2022) Незападные Балканы. Галактика, Москва. 656 c.
  9. Beha A. (2017) Between stabilization and demokratisation: elections, political parties and intra-party democracy in Kosovo. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Prishtina, Serbia. 299 p.
  10. Orosz A. (2016) Implementation of the Belgrade-Prishtina dialogue: results, controversies and prospects. Institute for Foreign Affairs and Trade, Budapest, Hungary. 148 p.

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023

##common.cookie##