Farming is an (un)rooted social group: problem statement

Capa

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The article examines the objective and subjective life prerequisites of modern Russian farming, a new group in the social village structure. Based on the parameters established in practice for the size of farming into small, medium and large groups, the author substantiated the main prerequisites for their rooting in the agro-industrial complex and the life of rural communities. Large farmers are the most securely rooted; medium-sized farmers are weaker. Particularly dramatic is the situation for heads of small farms, whose number has decreased by half over ten years (from 2006 to 2016). It has been suggested that the resources of this group, primarily arable land, will eventually pass over to large farmers. Medium-sized farmers are also close to this situation, mainly due to the lacking heirs capable of farming in rural conditions. This could lead to further reductions in the farming lifestyle. The author’s ideas are formulated on ways to rationalize the sociodynamics of the farms’ composition in order to maintain not only their economic and sociocultural role, but also the employment of the mass of rural residents. Actors of the farming way of life are the subject of transitional social states of society and its individual systems, where the lines of many economic, social and ideological players intersect. When realizing their life plans, they act in a space of uncertain future beyond their control.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Peter Velikiy

IAgP RAS

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: iagpran@mail.ru

Drю Sci. (Philos.), Prof., Leading Researcher

Rússia, Saratov

Bibliografia

  1. Agriculture in Russia. (2021) Stat. sat. Moscow: Rosstat. (In Russ.)
  2. Alakoz V. V. (2022) Land for family farming – without it, the depopulation of rural settlements in many regions cannot be stopped. In: There Should be Farming in Russia. Vol. II. Family-Type Farming: Potential, Development Practice. Moscow: OOO “Brein Print”. (In Russ.)
  3. Bashmachnikov V. F. (2019) Farming in Russia Is to be. Moscow: Pero. (In Russ.)
  4. Eriksson M., Dahlgren L., Emmelin M. (2013) Collective actors as driving forces for mobilizing social capital in a local community: what can be learned for health promotion? In: Social capital and rural development in the knowledge society. Ed. by H. Westland, K. Kobayashi. Edward Elgar: 273–299.
  5. Glebov I. P., Chernenko E. V. (2015) Reproduction of Human Capital in Agroeconomics. Saratov: Saratov GAU. (In Russ.)
  6. Gotz K., Ohmacht T. (2011) Research on mobility and lifestyle – what are the results? In: Mobilities: new perspectives on transport and society. Ed. by M. Grieco, J. Urry. Ashgate Publishing Limited: 91–109.
  7. Kalugina Z. I. (2015) Market transformation of the Russian agricultural sector: Sociological discourse. Novosibirsk: IEOPP SO RAN. (In Russ.)
  8. Kazarezov V. V. (2000) Farmers of Russia: Essays on the formation. Moscow: Accord Kolos. Vol. 1. (In Russ.)
  9. Meaning of Rural Life (A Sociological Analysis). (2016) Ed. by Zh. T. Toshchenko Moscow. (In Russ.)
  10. Menke C. (1991) Das Leben als Kunstwerk gestalten? Zur Dialektik der postmodernen Asthetisierung. Initial: 383–395.
  11. Mukhanova M. N. (2023) Enterpreneurship in the Russian agricultural sector. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki [Questions of theoretical economics]. No. 4: 155–173. (In Russ.)
  12. Namrueva L. V. (2021) Transformation of rural life on the example of the South of Russia farms. Sociologicheskaja nauka i socialnaja praktika [Sociological science and social practice]. Vol. 9. No. 2: 163– 176. (In Russ.)
  13. Plusnin Ju.M., Zausayeva Ya.D. et al. (2013) Otkhodniki. Moscow: Novyy khronograf. (In Russ.)
  14. Polbitsyn S. N. (2023) Taxonomic analysis of rural businessmen’s motivation. Prodovolstvennaya politika i bezopasnost [Food Policy and Security]. Vol. 10. No. 4: 645–662. (In Russ.)
  15. Porter M. (2001) The impact of competition on the form of strategies. In: The Strategic Process. St. Petersburg: Piter. (In Russ.)
  16. Portes A. (1998) Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociolo-gy. Vol. 24: 1–24.
  17. Schuller T., Baron S., Field J. (2000) Social capital: A review and critique. In: Social capital: Critical perspectives. Ed. by S. Baron et al. Oxford University Press: 1–38.
  18. Shevchenko I. O. (2018) Moscow region farmers’ life orientation or who are the “new peasants”? Vestnik RGGU. Ser. Filisofiya. Sociologiya. Iskusstvovedenie [RSUH Bulletin. “Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies”. Series]. No. 3(13): 63–72. (In Russ.)
  19. Shkaratan O. I., Yastrebov G. A. (2007) Identification of real (homogeneous) social groups in Russian society: methods and results. Applied Econometrics. No. 3: 96–119.
  20. Small forms of management in the agro-industrial complex. Moscow: ACCORD, 2022. URL: https://www.akkor.ru/sites/default/files/2022_02_akk_brsh_cifru_055_preview.pdf (accessed 22.05.24). (In Russ.)
  21. Velikiy P. P. (2010) New Forms of Searching for Living Among Present-Day Villagers. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9(137): 44–49. (In Russ.)
  22. Weber M. (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley. Vol.1.
  23. Zhukova T. A. (2020) Land and people. The Farmer’s Diary: a documentary essay. Krasnodar: KubGAU. (In Russ.)
  24. Zhuravleva L. A., Zarubina E. V., Ruchkin A. V., Simachkova N. N., Chupina I. P. (2019) Farming as a way of life. Biznes. Obrazovaniye. Pravo. [Business. Education. Law.] No. 4: 81–86.

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies