Man and society – through the prism of artificial intelligence

Мұқаба

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Prospects for the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies are discussed through the prism of human and societal imperfection. It is emphasized that artificial intelligence should be considered an essential reason for a kind of full-fledged self-audit by civilization and personality. The reasons for the pessimistic attitude to the possibilities of qualitative social transformations are evaluated, despite the vivid developments in the field of artificial intelligence. Fears of artificial intelligence reveal absurdity of many “basic” mechanisms of society’s existence up to now, including the standard ideas about prime importance of mercantile values. It is stated that there is a constant slip in the use of all without exception overtechnologies with maximum public benefit. Attention is focused on the expediency to implement a social revolution in its personally transformative dimension. At the same time it is noted that human improvement projects are almost unambiguously met with anxiety, distrust and reasonable skepticism.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

Andrei Yakovenko

Lugansk State University named after Vladimir Dahl

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: 6daoav@rambler.ru

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof., Lugansk State University named after Vladimir Dahl, Lugansk, Head of the Department

Ресей, Lugansk

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Barkhatova L. A. (2023) From virtual to digital research: methodological promises and limitations of approaches. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 62–70. doi: 10.31857/S013216250020183-4. (In Russ.)
  2. Baudrillard J. (2021) The Consumer Society. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.)
  3. Biyzhanova E. K. (2023) Universal basic income as a tool to combat inequality in modern russia Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 154–158. doi: 10.31857/S013216250026594-6. (In Russ.)
  4. Fromm E. (2019) The Sane Society. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.)
  5. Ivanov D. V., Asochakov Yu.V. (2023) Digitalization and critical theory of society. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 6: 16–28. doi: 10.31857/S013216250024389-0. (In Russ.)
  6. Kravchenko S. A. (2021) Sociology of digitalization. Moscow: Urait. (In Russ.)
  7. Rомаnоvsкiy N. V. (2022) Humans. society. sоciоlоgy (reflecting on a monograph by I. V. Katerny). Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 8: 161–166. doi: 10.31857/S013216250021063-2. (In Russ.)
  8. Smirnova A. S. (2023) Аbout the problems of digital inequality during the pandemic. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 157–158. doi: 10.31857/S013216250023440-7. (In Russ.)
  9. Sorokin P. (2006) Social and Cultural Dynamics. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.)
  10. Toshchenko Zh.T. (2001) The paradox man. Moscow: Gardariki. (In Russ.)

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024

Осы сайт cookie-файлдарды пайдаланады

Біздің сайтты пайдалануды жалғастыра отырып, сіз сайттың дұрыс жұмыс істеуін қамтамасыз ететін cookie файлдарын өңдеуге келісім бересіз.< / br>< / br>cookie файлдары туралы< / a>