Motives, directions and consequences of geographical mobility on the life course of Russian generations based on the results of in-depth interviews

Cover Page

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Drawing on in-depth interviews with respondents who moved at least once in their adult lives, this article analyzes the motives, directions, and consequences of geographic mobility. This topic is particularly relevant given the desire of one in four Russians to move to another city, coupled with the persistently low level of geographic mobility in the country [Voronina, Kozharin 2025]. This approach allows us to demonstrate the connection between motives for geographic mobility and their consequences, emphasizing the contextuality and fluidity of decisions in the context of political change and the turbulent times during which the move occurred. The semantic content of possible motives for geographic mobility is clarified (for example, it is shown that family-related motives for relocation include separation from the parental family, care for relatives, reunification with family members, etc.). It was shown that the consequences of relocation are closely linked to the informants’ starting opportunities: in families with high levels of accumulated capital (economic, cultural, and social), relocations were predominantly to larger cities or metropolitan areas and were one-time events. The motive for relocation was linked to the choice of destination and was part of the motivation for the move and a life choice. The destination of the move was not always a factor in the motivation and life choice (random selection). The success of a move is also influenced by whether the decision to move was made consciously or spontaneously. Spontaneous moves are more common among young people – after finishing school – and are more often associated with negative consequences of the move and a subsequent return home. In contrast, in those over 20, moves are most often planned with the family, and after 25, they are a more independent, deliberate decision. These interviews suggest greater opportunities for moving to different regions of Russia during the Soviet era (compared to today’s reality) due to the incentive system for developing new territories and shared collectivist values that encourage relocation in the interests of society. However, narratives noted greater difficulties in living and settling in the capital during the Soviet era, compared to today’s opportunities for geographic mobility.

About the authors

N. S Voronina

Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS; Institute for Comparative Social Research (CESSI)

Email: navor@bk.ru
Cand. Sci. (Social.), Leading Researcher Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Андреенкова А. В., Воронина Н. С. Долгосрочная географическая мобильность в жизненном пути разных поколений россиян: уровень, направление, мотивация, потенциал // Мир России. 2025а. Т. 34. № 2. С. 143–165. doi: 10.17323/1811-038X 2025-34-2-143-165.
  2. Andreenkova A. V., Voronina N. S. (2025a) Long-term Geographic Mobility in the Life Path of Different Generations of Russians: Level, Direction, Motivation, Potential. Mir Rossii [The World of Russia]. Vol. 34. No. 2: 143–165. doi: 10.17323/1811-038X 2025-34-2-143-165. (In Russ.)
  3. Андреенкова А. В., Воронина Н. С. Социальные последствия географической мобильности в жизненном пути россиян // Социологический журнал. 2025б. Т. 31. № 3. С. 39–62. doi: 10.19181/socjour.2025.31.3.3.
  4. Andreenkova A. V., Voronina N. S. (2025b) Social consequences of geographic mobility in the life course of Russians. Sociologicheskij zhurnal [Sociological journal]. Vol. 31. No. 3: 39–62. doi: 10.19181/socjour.2025.31.3.3. (In Russ.)
  5. Андреенкова А. В. Исследования жизненного пути – концептуальные и методологические подходы и решения // Социологическая наука и социальная практика. 2024. Т. 12. № 1. С. 6–24. doi: 10.19181/snsp.2024.12.1.1.
  6. Andreenkova A. V. (2024) Life Course Studies – Conceptual and Methodological Approaches and Solution. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika [Sociological science and social practice]. Vol. 12. No. 1: 6–24. doi: 10.19181/snsp.2024.12.1.1. (In Russ.)
  7. Бурдье П. Социология социального пространства / Пер. с франц.; отв. ред. Н. А. Шматко. М.: ИЭС, 2007.
  8. Воронина Н. С., Кожарин В. Л. Нереализованная географическая мобильность в жизненном пути россиян: мотивы, барьеры, последствия // Социологическая наука и социальная практика. 2025. Т. 13. № 3. С. 77–95. doi: 10.19181/snsp.2025.13.3.4.
  9. Voronina N. S., Kozharin V. L. (2025) Unrealized Geographic Mobility in the Life Course of Russians: Motives, Barriers, Consequences. Sociologicheskaya nauka i social’naya praktika. [Sociological science and social practice]. Vol. 13. No. 3: 77–95. doi: 10.19181/snsp.2025.13.3.4. (In Russ.)
  10. Голенкова З. Т., Сушко П. Е. Социальная мобильность в контексте миграционных биографий россиян // Социологические исследования. 2016. № 12. С. 95–104.
  11. Golenkova Z. T., Sushko P. E. (2016) Social Mobility in the Context of Migration Biographies of Russians. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Research]. No. 12: 95–104. (In Russ.)
  12. Голенкова З. Т., Сушко П. Е., Стрельникова А. В. Территориальная мобильность в контексте социально-­статусных изменений // Социальная мобильность в усложняющемся обществе: объективные и субъективные аспекты / Отв. ред. В. В. Семенова, М. Ф. Черныш, П. Е. Сушко. М.: ФНИСЦ РАН, 2019. С. 383–415.
  13. Golenkova Z. T., Sushko P. E., Strelnikova A. V. (2019) Territorial Mobility in the Context of Social and Status Changes. In: Semenova V. V., CHernysh M.F., Sushko P. E. (eds) Social Mobility in an Increasingly Complex Society: Objective and Subjective Aspects. Moscow: FNISC RAN: 383–415. (In Russ.)
  14. Карачурина Л. Б., Мкртчян Н. В. В город или в пригород: что выбирают россияне на разных этапах жизненного пути // Известия РАН. Сер. географическая. 2024. Т. 88. № 5. С. 695–711. doi: 10.31857/S2587556624050062.
  15. Karachurina L. B., Mkrtchyan N. V. (2024) To the Сity or to the Suburbs: What Russians Choose at Different Stages of Their Lives. Izvestiya RAN. Ser. geograficheskaya [News of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Geographical Series]. Vol. 88. No. 5: 695–711. doi: 10.31857/S2587556624050062. (In Russ.)
  16. Малева Т. М., Бурдяк А. Я. Территориальная мобильность населения России в контексте социальной динамики // Регион: экономика и социология. 2018. № 4. С. 89–111. doi: 10.15372/REG20180404.
  17. Maleva T. M., Burdyak A. Ya. Territorial Mobility of the Population of Russia in the Context of Social Dynamics. Region: ekonomika i sociologiya [Region: Economics and Sociology]. No. 4: 89–111. doi: 10.15372/REG20180404. (In Russ.)
  18. Мкртчян Н. В. Стягивание населения России в крупные города и их пригороды // Журнал НЭА. 2024. Т. 63. № 2. С. 241–248. doi: 10.31737/22212264_2024_2_241-248.
  19. Mkrtchyan N. V. (2024). Drawing of the Russian population into large cities and their suburb. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association]. Vol. 2. No. 63: 241–248. doi: 10.31737/22212264_2024_2_241-248. (In Russ.)
  20. Стрельникова А. В. Пространственные проекции социальной мобильности: переезды как доминантные события биографического повествования // INTER. 2015. № 10. С. 39–46.
  21. Strelnikova A. V. (2015) Spatial Projections of Social Mobility: Relocations as Dominant Events of Biographical Narrative. INTER. No. 10: 39–46. (In Russ.)
  22. Сушко П.Е, Эспи Т. Г. и др. Анализ социально-демографических особенностей миграционных биографий россиян. 2017. URL: https://inlnk.ru/20RAwE (дата обращения: 04.10.2025).
  23. Sushko P. E., Espi T. G. et al. (2017) Analysis of Socio-Demographic Features of Migration Biographies of Russians. URL: https://inlnk.ru/20RAwE (accessed 04.10. 2025). (In Russ.)
  24. Топилин А. В. Миграция населения и формирование трудовых ресурсов в СССР и на постсоветском пространстве: тенденции и регулирование. М.: Экон-Информ, 2020.
  25. Topilin A. V. (2020) Population Migration and Labor Force Formation in the USSR and the Post-Soviet Space: Trends and Regulation. Moscow: Ekon-Inform. (In Russ.)
  26. Урри Дж. Мобильности / Пер. с англ. А. В. Лазарева, вступ. Ст. Н. А. Харламова. М.: Праксис, 2012.
  27. Urri J. (2012) Mobilities. Moscow: Praxis. (In Russ.)
  28. Флоринская Ю. Ф., Мкртчян Н. В. Миграция в Россию: самый низкий уровень за десятилетие // Экономическое развитие России. 2021. Т. 28. № 1. С. 50–54.
  29. Florinskaya Yu.F., Mkrtchyan N. V. (2021) Migration to Russia: the lowest level in a decade. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii [Economic development of Russia]. Vol. 28. No. 1: 50–54. (In Russ.)
  30. Aldridge S., Halpern D., Fitzpatrick S. Social Сapital: A Discussion Paper. London. Performance and Innovation Unit. 2002. URL: https://ntouk.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/socialcapital.pdf (дата обращения: 21.05.25).
  31. Beck U. Living Your Own Life in a Runaway World: Individualization, Globalization, and Politics. In: Hutton W., Giddens A. (Eds.) Global Capitalism. N. Y.: The New Press. 2000. P. 164–174.
  32. Belot M., Ermisch J. Friendship Ties and Geographical Mobility: Evidence from the BHPS. Germany. 2002. URL: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=b60b471baa7e2d4ecb679d39aa3de12988bae94d (дата обращения: 21.05.25).
  33. Bourdieu P., Sayad A. Le déracinement: la crise de l’agriculture traditionnelle en Algérie. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1964.
  34. Boyle P., Cooke T. J. et al. Cross-National Comparison of the Impact of Family Migration on Women’s Employment Status // Demography. 2001. Vol. 38. P. 201–213. doi: 10.1353/dem.2001.0012.
  35. Castles S., Miller, M. J. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2009.
  36. Davanzo J. Repeat Migration, Information Costs, and Location-Specific Capital // Population and Environment. 1981.Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 45–73. doi: 10.1007/BF01362575.
  37. Geist С., McManus P. A. Geographical Mobility over the Life Course: Motivations and Implications // Population, Space and Place. 2008. Vol. 14. No. 4. P. 283–303. doi: 10.1002/psp.508.
  38. Hecht K., McArthur D. et al. Elites in the UK: Pulling away? International Inequalities Institute. 2020. URL: https://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Pulling-­Away.pdf (дата обращения: 21.05.25).
  39. Lansing J. B., Morgan J. N. The Effect of Geographical Mobility on Income // The Journal of Human Resources. 1967. Vol. 2, No. 4. P. 449–460.
  40. Lassetter J. H., Callister L. C. The Impact of Migration on the Health of Voluntary Migrants in Western Societies. A Review of the Literature // Journal of Transcultural Nursing. 2009. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 93–104. doi: 10.1177/1043659608325841.
  41. Li X., Stanton B., Chen X. et al. Health Indicators and Geographic Mobility among Young Rural-to-­Urban Migrants in China // World Health Popuationl. 2006. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 5–21. doi: 10.12927/whp.2006.18148.
  42. Mulholland G. E., Herce M. E. et al. Geographic Mobility and Treatment Outcomes Among People in Care for Tuberculosis in the Lake Victoria Region of East Africa: A Multi-­Site Prospective Cohort Study // PLOS Global Public Health. 2023. Vol. 3. No. 6. P. 1–20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001992.
  43. Panichella N., Impicciatore R. The Impact of Geographical Mobility on Class Attainment. A Longitudinal Study of Internal Migrants in Europe. Italy. 2025. URL: https://epc2024.eaps.nl/uploads/240915 (дата обращения: 21.05.25).
  44. Park R. E., Burgess E. W. The City: Suggestions for the Study of Human Nature in the Urban Environment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1925.
  45. Reed-­Danahay D. Bourdieu and Social Space: Mobilities, Trajectories, Emplacements. N. Y.: Berghahn Books, 2020.
  46. Savage M. The Missing Link? The Relationship Between Spatial Mobility and Social Mobility // British Journal of Sociology. 1988. No. 39. P. 554–77.
  47. Sheller M., Urry J. The New Mobilities Paradigm // Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 2006. Vol. 38. No 2. P. 207–226. doi: 10.1068/a37268.
  48. Sorokin P. A. Social mobility. N. Y.: Harper & Brothers, 1927.
  49. Wall K., Aboim S. et al. Geographical Mobility and Family Life: Comparing Generations from a Life Course Perspective // Comparative Population Studies. 2013. Vol. 38. No. 2. P. 341–370. doi: 10.12765/CPoS 2013-11.

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).