Types of capital in the field of “silver volunteering”

Cover Page

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article examines the features of the social capital of elderly volunteers through the prism of the Bourdieusian approach: the inequality of resources is shown and ways of converting various types of capital into the field of volunteering are presented. The temporal aspects of the formation of a volunteer’s habitus are revealed. The research makes it possible to see the problem of capital formation by the senior age volunteers through their dynamic interactions, painstaking and difficult work to create solidarity and redefine themselves. Being at the forefront of the policy of active longevity and in the field of view of the third sector, the movement of ‘silver’ volunteers contributes to the implementation of the neoliberal project of a healthy lifestyle of the elderly. An idea of silver volunteering is inclusive because people in the senior age as a socially vulnerable group get an opportunity to participate in public life, develop, and feel their need. The real practices of implementing this idea are rich in examples of human potential disclosure, the creation of cohesive communities, the embodiment of bright and important ideas not only of direct social assistance, but also of social change. At the same time, the experience of volunteering becomes a tool for distinguishing and increasing competitiveness in a field with an unequal distribution of resources.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Elena R. Iarskaia

University HSE

Email: eiarskaia@hse.ru

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof., Head of International Laboratory for Social Integration Research

Russian Federation, Moscow

Valentina N. Yarskaya

Yuri Gagarin State Technical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: eiarskaia@hse.ru

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Prof., Director of the Scientific and Educational Center for Monitoring Research

Russian Federation, Saratov

Rostislav V. Kononenko

University HSE

Email: rkononenko@hse.ru

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Assos. Prof. of the Department of General Sociology

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Ackermann K., Erhardt J., Freitag, M. (2023) Crafting Social Integration? Welfare State and Volunteering Across Social Groups and Policy Areas in 23 European Countries. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Vol. 75: 83–304. doi: 10.1007/s11577-023-00881-8.
  2. Ambarova P., Zborovski G. (2017) Volunteers of the ‘silver’ age: regulating of temporal strategies of behavior of the age group. Vestnik PNIPU. Social’no-ekonomicheskie nauki [Herald of PNIPU. Socio economic studies]. No. 4: 35–47. doi: 10.15593/2224-9354/2017.4.3. (In Russ.)
  3. Angermann A. (2011) Senior Citizens and Volunteering in the European Union. Observatory for Sociopolitical Developments in Europe, November 2011. URL: https://www.sociopolitical-observatory.eu/uploads/tx_aebgppublications/Backgroundpaper_Senior_Citizens_Volunteering_11_2011_BEO.pdf (accessed 23.02.2024).
  4. Anheier H. K., Salamon L. M. Volunteering in and the concept of social capital. Social Sciences: Journal Articles. Paper 4. URL: http://digitalcommons.bolton.ac.uk/socsci_journalspr/4 (accessed 23.02.2024).
  5. Boneham M., Sixsmith J. (2003) Volunteering and the concept of social capital // Social Sciences: Journal Articles. Paper 4. URL: http://digitalcommons.bolton.ac.uk/socsci_journalspr/4 (accessed 23.02.2024)
  6. Bourdieu P. (2002) Forms of capital. Ekonomicheskaya sociologiya [Economic sociology]. No. 3(5): 60–74. (In Russ.)
  7. Brown J. W., Chen S.L, Mefford L. et al. (2011) Becoming an older volunteer: a grounded theory study. Nursing Research and Practice. doi: 10.1155/2011/361250.
  8. Clarke J. (2003) Unstable States: The Transformation of Welfare Systems. The Journal of Social Policy Studies. No. 1(1): 69–88.
  9. Dean J. (2014) How structural factors promote instrumental motivations within youth volunteering: A qualitative analysis of volunteer brokerage. Voluntary Sector Review. Vol. 5. No. 2: 231–247. doi: 10.1332/204080514X14013591527611.
  10. Dean J. (2021) Informal volunteering, inequality, and illegitimacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. No. 51(3): 527–544. doi: 10.1177/08997640211034580.
  11. Eimhjellen I. (2023) Capital, Inequality, and Volunteering. A Bourdieusian Perspective. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. No. 34: 654–669. doi: 10.1007/s11266–022–00501–7.
  12. Foucault M. (2011) Security, territories, population. A course of lectures delivered at the Collège de France in the 1977–1978 academic year. St. Petersburg: Nauka: 161–162. (In Russ.)
  13. Gil-Lacruz M., Saz-Gil M.I., Gil-Lacruz A.I. (2019) Benefits of Older Volunteering on Wellbeing: An International Comparison. Frontiers in Psychology, Section Organizational Psychology. No. 10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02647.
  14. Gilleard Ch. (2020) Bourdieu’s forms of capital and the stratification of later life. Journal of Aging Studies. Vol. 53. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100851. URL: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol62/iss4/3 (accessed 03.12.2023).
  15. Grigorieva I. A., Bogdanova E. A. (2020) The concept of active aging in Europe and Russia in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. Laboratorium: Zhurnal social’nyh issledovanij [Laboratorium: Journal of Social Research]. No. 12(2): 187–211. doi: 10.25285/2078-1938-2020-12-2-187-21. (In Russ.)
  16. Haski-Leventhal D. (2009) Elderly volunteering and well-being: A cross-European comparison based on SHARE data. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. No. 20: 388–404.
  17. Hemment J. (2015) Youth Politics in Putin’s Russia: Producing Patriots and Entrepreneurs. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  18. Hustinx L., Grubb A., Rameder P., Shachar I. Y. (2022) Inequality in Volunteering: Building a New Research Front. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. No. 33: 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s11266-022-00455-w.
  19. Katz S., Calasanti T. (2015) Critical perspectives on successful aging: does it “appeal more than it illuminates”? Gerontologist. No. 55(1): 26–33. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu027.
  20. Kienko T., Pevnaia M., Telepaeva D., Ptitsyna N., Kaigorodova L. (2022) Practices of self-organizing and activities of people of senior age in three Russian regions. In: Widening opportunities (empowerment) of people of senior age in practices of self-organizing and activity. Ed. by T. Kienko. Rostov-on-Don: FNO: 176–215. (In Russ.)
  21. Krasnova O. V. (2000) Grandmother in the family. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 108– 116. (In Russ.)
  22. Kukkonen I. (2021) Physical Appearance as a Form of Capital: Key Problems and Tensions. In: Sarpila O., Kukkonen I., Pajunen T., Åberg E. (eds) Appearance as Capital. Leeds: Emerald Publishing: 23–37. doi: 10.1108/978-1-80043-708-120210002.
  23. Meyer M., Rameder P. (2022) Who Is in Charge? Social Inequality in Different Fields of Volunteering. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. No. 33: 18–32. doi: 10.1007/s11266-020-00313-7.
  24. Musick M. A., Wilson J. (2007) Volunteers. A Social Profile. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  25. Nizamova A. (2020) Normativity and personality in old age: a media discourse on “Active longevity” in modern Russia. Laboratorium: Zhurnal social’nyh issledovanij [Laboratorium: Journal of Social Research]. No.12 (2): 45–67. doi: 10.25285/2078-1938-2020-12-2-45-67 (In Russ.)
  26. Osmuk L. A., Nezamaeva O. V. (2021) Social activity of elderly people living in a large city: opportunities and problems. Vestnik TomGU. Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Politologiya [Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science]. No. 62: 102–110. doi: 10.17223/1998863X/62/9. (In Russ.)
  27. Parfenova O. A. (2020) Involvement of the elderly in volunteer and civic activity as a tool to overcome social exclusion. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny [Monitoring public opinion: economic and social changes]. No. 4: 119–135. DOI: 10.14515/ monitoring.2020.4.1580. (In Russ.)
  28. Parfenova O. A., Galkin K. A. (2023) Social activity and participation of elderly Russians in the context of active longevity. Zhurnal sociologii i social’noj antropologii [Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology]. No. 26(1): 200–223. (In Russ.)
  29. Pavelek L. (2013) Senior Volunteering in the Context of Active Ageing. World Applied Sciences Journal. No. 26(8): 1070–1078. doi: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.26.08.1708.
  30. Prisiazhniuk D., Holavins A. (2023) Active Ageing and Social Services: The Paradox of Empowerment in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies. No. 75(2): 309–329. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2022.2094341.
  31. Rogozin D. M. (2016) Liberalization of aging, or labour, knowledge and health in senior age. In: Old people belong here: social interpretation of aging. Ed. by D. Rogozin, A. Ipatova. Мoscow: IS RAN: 8–41. (In Russ.)
  32. Rozanov V. A., Maltseva Yu.S., Tsaranov K. N. (2018) Methodological manual “silver” volunteering: key aspects of development. Association of Volunteer Centers. URL: https://www.gov.spb.ru/static/writable/ckeditor/uploads/2018/10/22/Metod%20posobie%20serebtyanie%20volonteri.pdf (accessed 03.12.2023).
  33. Russell A., Nyame-Mensah A., De Wit A., Handy F. (2018) Volunteering and Wellbeing Among Ageing Adults: A Longitudinal Analysis. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. No. 30(2). 115–128. doi: 10.1007/s11266-018-0041-8.
  34. Salamon L. M., Sokolowski S. W., Haddock M. A. (2017) Explaining civil society development: A social origins approach. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  35. Schneider-Kamp A. (2021) Health capital: toward a conceptual framework for understanding the construction of individual health. Social Theory and Health. No. 19: 205–219. doi: 10.1057/s41285-020-00145-x
  36. Shchukina N. P. (2003) Institute of Mutual Assistance in social support of the elderly. Moscow: Dashkov and K. (In Russ.)
  37. Siisiäinen M. (2003) Two Concepts of Social Capital: Bourdieu vs. Putnam. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology. No. 40: 183–204.
  38. Sinyavskaya O., Gladnikova E. (2007) Adult children and their parents: intensity of contacts. Demoskop Weekly [Demoscope Weekly]. No. 287. URL: http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2007/0287/index.php (accessed 03.12.2023). (In Russ.)

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies