Spatial Configuration of Key Parliamentary Constituencies in the Republic of Korea in the XXI Century

封面

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

This article analyzes electoral competition between key parties in the Republic of Korea. Although the electoral geography of RoK is atypical, the presence of an almost two-party system and the use of single-member districts allow for the analysis of competition in Korean elections in the same context as in more studied countries such as the United States, Canada, and New Zealand. We define the stably swing constituencies in 2000-2020’s, their location and factors of high volatility. The overwhelming majority of districts which regularly change their political orientation are located in the north of the country — Capital Region and Chungcheon — where high competition is observed in the largest cities. Electoral differentiation of urban agglomerations is complex and subject to the influence of multiple factors, but several patterns can be identified. A significant portion of swing constituencies are in this state due to their location in transitional zones between areas with high support for candidates from the conservative camp (center and far periphery of the city) and their opponents (suburban semi-periphery). The main factor of differentiation is the electoral divide between different generations of voters. In small cities, the electorate of the main parties balances each other out, resulting in these constituencies regularly changing their party orientation. Some constituencies in the center of Seoul have special significance for both parties, so political heavyweights traditionally run in them, attracting attention to their constituencies and making them swing.

作者简介

Alexander Lukyanov

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: pdvjournal@mail.ru
1, Leninskiye Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

Fedor Chernetskii

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: pdvjournal@mail.ru
1, Leninskiye Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

参考

  1. 
  2. Андронова Л.А. Формирование и эволюция региональной идентичности в Республике Корея // Человек в меняющемся мире. Проблемы идентичности и социальной адаптации в истории и современности. Исторический факультет ТГУ. Изд-во Томского университета. 2015. С. 84–92. DOI: 10.172239785751123666/7
  3. Чернецкий Ф.М. Gangnam Style: роль локальной идентичности в электоральном поведении жителей Каннама (Сеул) // Городские исследования и практики. 2022. № 2 (7). С. 71–86. doi: 10.17323/usp72202271–86
  4. Чернецкий Ф.М. Регионализм как ключевой фактор в электоральных процессах в Республике Корея // Вестник российского корееведения. 2022. № 13. С. 67–81.
  5. Asekere G. The Dynamics and Complexities of Voter Choices in Ghana: A Perspective of Most Populous Swing and Stronghold Constituencies // The African Review. 2022. No. 1 (49). Pp. 1–28. doi: 10.1163/1821889X-bja10022
  6. Baskaran T., Hessami Z. Political alignment and intergovernmental transfers in parliamentary systems: Evidence from Germany // Public Choice. 2017. No. 171. Pp. 75–98. doi: 10.1007/s11127–016–0398–4
  7. Beachler D.W. et al. Presidential Swing States: Why Only Ten Matter. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2015. 390 p.
  8. Demographics and the Future of South Korea // Carnegie. Endowment for International Peace. June 29, 2021. URL: https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/06/29/demographics-and-future-of-south-korea-pub-84817 (дата обращения 27.07.2021).
  9. Gimm D.W. Fracturing Hegemony: Regionalism and State Rescaling in South Korea, 1961–71 // International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2013. No. 4 (37). Pp. 1147–1167. doi: 10.1111/1468–2427.12002
  10. Johnston R.J. Changing Voter Preferences, Uniform Electoral Swing, and the Geography of Voting in New Zealand, 1972–1975 // New Zealand Geographer. 1981. No. 1 (37). Pp. 13–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1745–7939.1981.tb00934.x
  11. Kim W.B. Regionalism: Its origins and substance with competition and exclusion // Korea Journal. 2003. No. 2 (43). Pp. 5–31.
  12. Park J. The Conservatization of the 386 Generation: Cohort Effects in Voting Behavior of a Political Generation in South Korea. Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, 2011. 63 p.
  13. Republic of Korea. National Electoral Commission. URL: https://www.nec.go.kr/site/nec/main.do# (дата обращения 02.03.2023).
  14. Shaukat M. Too close to call: electoral competition and politician behavior in India // Working Papers. Department of Economics, MIT, 2019. 67 p.
  15. Tantri P.L., Thota N. Effective Democracy and Swing Voters: Evidence Based on Actual Voting Records // Indian School of Business Research Paper Series. 2015. 39 p.
  16. Yea S. Maps of resistance and geographies of dissent in the Cholla region of South Korea // Korean Studies. 2000. № 1 (24). Pp. 69–93. doi: 10.1353/ks.2000.0020
  17. 김욱: 충청 지역주의의 역사적 발전과정과 특성 (Ким Ук. Исторический процесс развития и характеристика Чхунчхонского регионализма) // 정치정보연구. 2007. No. 2 (10). Pp. 117–134.

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023

##common.cookie##