REARING RODENT PUPS IN FOSTER FAMILIES OF TNEIR OWN OR ANOTHER MAMMAL SPECIES: SURVIVAL AND THE CAUSES OF MORTALITY

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Conditions of rearing pups at an early age render a significant impact on subsequent development, reproduction and certain features of the behavior of mammals including rodents. Parents, mostly lactating females, are the main component of the social environment of pups at the early period of postnatal ontogenesis in most mammal species. Therefore, rearing pups in foster families of their own (in-fostering) or another, even taxonomically distant species (cross-fostering) is one of the main methods of assessing the impact of early experience and maternal environment on the development of animal behavior. Cross-fostering or in-fostering is also used for the conservation of valuable animal species. Therefore, more effective fostering methods that provide the maximum survival of the young are necessary to be developed. According to this, we investigated the survival and possible causes of the mortality of rodent pups representing several species in foster families of their own or another mammal species. We conducted a series of experiments on the cross-fostering and in-fostering of house (Mus musculus) and mound-building (Mus spicilegus) mice, yellow steppe lemmings (Eolagurus luteus) and brown rats (Rattus norvegicus), and on rearing rat pups in foster families of the European polecat (Mustela putorius). The proportion of successfully cross-fostered pups (0–68.4) was lower compared to the in-fostered (93.3–100) ones. This result is presumably explained by more significant differences in the maternal environment when reared by a heterospecific female. According to the literature data, the age of foster and recipient female pups, species-specific differences of odor, the presence or absence of a male and the level of paternal care, the level of stress of the mother and offspring, the expression of maternal instinct, the previous female experience in rearing its own and foster pups, the duration of lactation and the nutritional value of maternal milk are the factors that seem to affect the survival and mortality of foster pups.

About the authors

V. V. Streltsov

Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: v.streltsov.95@gmail.com
Russia, 119071, Moscow

M. V. Nekrasova

Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: smnvsb@gmail.com
Russia, 119071, Moscow

A. N. Maltsev

Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: evkotenkova@yandex.ru
Russia, 119071, Moscow

A. A. Petrin

Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: evkotenkova@yandex.ru
Russia, 119071, Moscow

E. V. Kotenkova

Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: evkotenkova@yandex.ru
Russia, 119071, Moscow

References

  1. Амбарян А.В., Некрасова М.В., Котенкова Е.В., 2022. Экспериментальная гибридизация и интенсивность размножения домовых (Mus musculus wagneri) и курганчиковых (M. spicilegus) мышей: влияние раннего опыта и материнской среды // Зоологический журнал. Т. 101. № 4. С. 471–480.
  2. Аристов А.А., Барышников Г.Ф., 2001. Млекопитающие фауны России и сопредельных территорий. Хищные и ластоногие. СПб.: Зоологический институт РАН. 560 с.
  3. Громов В.С., 2013. Забота о потомстве у грызунов: этологические, физиологические и эволюционные аспекты. М.: Товарищество научных изданий КМК. 338 с.
  4. Громов В.С., 2020. Эпигенетическое программирование различий в поведении и эволюция социальности у грызунов // Успехи современной биологии. Т. 140. № 1. С. 58–72.
  5. Данилов П.И., Русаков О.С., 1969. Особенности экологии черного хоря в северо-западных областях европейской части СССР // Зоологический журнал. Т. 68. Вып. 9. С. 1383–1394.
  6. Данилов П.И., Туманов И.Л., 1976. Куньи северо-запада СССР. Л.: Наука, Ленинградское отд. 256 с.
  7. Западнюк И.П., Западнюк В.И., Захария Е.А., Западнюк Б.В., 1983. Лабораторные животные. Разведение, содержание, использование в эксперименте. Киев: Вища школа. Головное издательство. 383 с.
  8. Зорина З.А., Смирнова А.А., 2006. О чем рассказали “говорящие” обезьяны. М.: Языки славянских культур. 424 с.
  9. Котенкова Е.В., 2014. Сравнительный анализ этологических и физиологических механизмов прекопуляционной репродуктивной изоляции у грызунов // Успехи современной биологии. Т. 135. № 5. С. 488–518.
  10. Котенкова Е.В., Мешкова Н.Н., Шутова М.И., 1989. О крысах и мышах. М.: Наука. 176 с.
  11. Котенкова Е.В., Мальцев А.Н., Амбарян А.В., 2017. Влияние раннего обонятельного опыта на выбор полового партнера у млекопитающих: эволюционные аспекты // Журнал общей биологии. Т. 78. № 4. С. 21–39.
  12. Котенкова Е.В., Амбарян А.В., Мальцев А.Н., 2018. Влияние перекрестного воспитания детенышей у двух видов мышей Mus musculus и M. spicilegus: изменение реакции на кон- и гетероспецифические запахи // Известия Российской Академии наук. Серия биологическая. № 2. С. 200–208.
  13. Крученкова Е.П., 2009. Материнское поведение млекопитающих. М.: “Красанд”. 207 с.
  14. Крученкова Е.П., Гольцман М.Е., 1990. Взаимоотношения между матерью и детенышами // Серая крыса: Систематика, экология, регуляция численности. Отв. ред. В.Е. Соколов, Е.В. Карасева. М.: Наука. С. 247–275.
  15. Милютин А.И., 1990. Систематика // Серая крыса: Систематика, экология, регуляция численности. Отв. ред. В.Е. Соколов, Е.В. Карасева. М.: Наука. С. 7–33.
  16. Рыльников В.А., 1990. Размножение, возрастной состав и смертность // Серая крыса: Систематика, экология, регуляция численности. Отв. ред. В.Е. Соколов, Е.В. Карасева. М.: Наука. С. 181–229.
  17. Соколов В.Е., Вознесенская В.В., Вайсоки Ч.Д., 1996. Индуцированная чувствительность к одорантам: новый феномен // Доклады АН. Т. 343. С. 843–846.
  18. Соколов В.Е., Квашнин С.А., 1990. Социальная организация // Серая крыса: Систематика, экология, регуляция численности. // Серая крыса: Систематика, экология, регуляция численности. Отв. ред. В.Е. Соколов, Е.В. Карасева. М.: Наука. С. 275–289.
  19. Соколов В.Е., Квашнин С.А., 1990а. Онтогенез поведения // Серая крыса: Систематика, экология, регуляция численности. Отв. ред. В.Е. Соколов, Е.В. Карасева. М.: Наука. С. 230–247.
  20. Соколов В.Е., Котенкова Е.В., 1987. Реакция домовых мышей на запах особей своего вида: влияние раннего обонятельного опыта // Известия АН СССР. № 2. С. 165–171.
  21. Соколов В.Е., Котенкова Е.В., Лялюхина С.И., 1990. Биология домовой и курганчиковой мышей. М.: Наука. 207 с.
  22. Терновский Д.В., Терновская Ю.Г., 1977. Биологический репродуктивный потенциал // Охота и охотничье хозяйство. № 2. С. 10–11.
  23. Терновский Д.В., Терновская Ю.Г., 1978. Потенциальная репродуктивная способность у куницеобразных // Известия Сибирского отделения АН СССР. Серия биологических наук. Вып. 1. С. 88–91.
  24. Терновский Д.В., Терновская Ю.Г., 1994. Экология куницеобразных. Новосибирск: ВО “Наука”. Сибирская издательская фирма. 223 с.
  25. Шубин И.Г., 1978. Желтая пеструшка – Lagurus (Eolagurus) luteus Eversmann, 1840 // Млекопитающие Казахстана. Т. I. Ч. 3. Песчанки, полевки, алтайский цокор. Под ред. А.А. Слудского. Алма-Ата: “Наука” КазССР. С. 291–312.
  26. Alleva E., D’ Udine B., 1987. Early learning capability in rodents: A review (Rattus norvegicus and Mus musculus) // International Journal of Comparative Psychology. V. 1. P. 107–125.
  27. Barbazanges A., Vallee M., Mayo W., Day J., Simon H., Le Moal M., Maccari S., 1996. Early and later adoptions have different long-term effects on male rat offspring // The Journal of Neuroscience. V. 16. P. 7783–7790.
  28. Bartolomucci A., Gioiosa L., Chirieleison A., Ceresini G., Parmigiani S., Palanza P., 2004. Cross- fostering in mice: Behavioral and physiological carry-over effects in adulthood // Genes, Brain and Behavior. V. 3. P. 115–122.
  29. Bateson P., Barker D., Clutton-Brock T., Deb D., D’Udine B., Foley R.A., et al., 2004. Developmental plasticity and human health // Nature. V. 430. № 6998. P. 419–421.
  30. Baudoin C., Busquet N., Dobson F.S., Gheusi G., Féron C., Durand J-L., Heth G., Patris B., Todrank J., 2005. Male–female associations and female olfactory neurogenesis with pair bonding in mound-building mice // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. V. 84. P. 323–334.
  31. Beauchamp G.K., Wellington J.L., 1981. Cross-species rearing influences urine preferences in wild guinea pigs // Physiology and Behavior. V. 26. P. 1121–1124.
  32. Benus R.F., Rondigs M., 1996. Patterns of maternal effort in mouse lines bidirectionally selected for aggression // Animal Behaviour. V. 51. P. 67–75.
  33. Benzaken A., 2006. Encounters with Wild Children: Temptation and Disillusionment in the Study of Human Nature. Montreal Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press. 393 p.
  34. Bester-Meredith J.K., Marler C.A., 2001. Vasopressin and aggression in cross-fostered California mice (Peromyscus californicus) and white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) // Hormones and Behavior. V. 40. P. 51–64.
  35. Bester-Meredith J.K., Marler C.A., 2003. Vasopressin and the transmission of paternal behavior across generations in mated, cross-fostered Peromyscus mice // Behavioral Neuroscience. V. 117. P. 455–463.
  36. Burton T., Metcalfe N.B., 2014. Can environmental conditions experienced in early life influence future generations? // Proceedings of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences. V. 281. P. 1–8.
  37. Cramer C.P., Thiels E., Alberts J.L., 1990. Weaning in rats: I. Maternal behavior // Developmental Psychobiology. V. 23. P. 479–493.
  38. Crofton K.M., Kodavanti P.R.S., Derr-Yellin E.C., Casey A.C., Kehn L.S., 2000. PCBs, thyroid hormones, and ototoxicity in rats: Cross-fostering experiments demonstrate the impact of postnatal lactation exposure // Toxicological Sciences. V. 57. P. 131–140.
  39. Denenberg V.H, Grota L.J., Zarrow M.X., 1963. Maternal behavior in the rat: Analysis of cross-fostering // Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. V. 5. P. 133–141.
  40. De Santis D., Schmaltz L.W., 1984. The mother-litter relationship in developmental rat studies: Cannibalism vs caring // Developmental Psychobiology. V. 17. P. 255–262.
  41. Dobson F.S., Baudoin C., 2002. Experimental tests of spatial association and kinship in monogamous mice (Mus spicilegus) and polygynous mice (Mus musculus domesticus) // Canadian Journal of Zoology. V. 80. P. 980–986.
  42. Francis D., Diorio J., Liu D., Meaney M.J., 1999. Nongenomic trasmission across generations of maternal behavior and stress responses in the rats // Science. V. 286. P. 1155–1158.
  43. Gomez-Serrano M., Tonelli L., Listwak S., Sternberg E., Riley A.L., 2001. Effects of cross-fostering on open-field behavior, acoustic startle, lipopolysaccharide-induced corticosterone release, and body weight in Lewis and Fischer rats // Behavior Genetics. V. 31. P. 427–436.
  44. Gouat P., Feron C., 2005. Deficit in reproduction in polygynously mated females of the monogamous mound-building mouse Mus spicilegus // Reproduction, Fertility and Development. V. 17. P. 617–623.
  45. Grota L.G., Ader R., 1969. Continuous recording of maternal behaviour in Rattus norvegicus // Animal Behaviour. V. 17. P. 722–729.
  46. Hager R., Cheverud J.M., Wolf J.B., 2009. Change in maternal environment induced by cross-fostering alters genetic and epigenetic effects on complex traits in mice // Proceedings of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences. V. 276. P. 2949–2954.
  47. Hawkins L.K., Cranford J.A., 1992. Long-term effects of intraspecific and interspecific cross-fostering on two species of Peromyscus // Journal of Mammalogy. V. 73. P. 802–807.
  48. Hickman D.L., Swan M.P., 2011. Effects of age of pups and removal of existing litter on pup survival during cross-fostering between multiparous outbred mice // Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science. V. 50. P. 641–646.
  49. Howells F.M., Bindewald L., Russell V.A., 2009. Cross-fostering does not alter the neurochemistry or behavior of spontaneously hypertensive rats // Behavioral and Brain Functions. V. 5. P. 24.
  50. Huck U.W., Banks E.M., 1980. The effects of cross-fostering on the behavior of two species of North American lemmings, Dicrostonyx groenlandicus and Lemmus trimucronatus: I. Olfactory preferences // Animal Behaviour. V. 28. P. 1046–1052.
  51. Huck U.W., Banks E.M., 1980a. The effects of cross-fostering on the behavior of two species of North American lemmings, Dicrostonyx groenlandicus and Lemmus trimucronatus: II. Sexual behavior // Animal Behaviour. V. 28. P. 1053–1062.
  52. Huck U.W., Banks E.M., 1980b. The effects of cross-fostering on the behavior of two species of North American lemmings, Dicrostonyx groenlandicus and Lemmus trimucronatus: III Agonistic behavior // Animal Behaviour. V. 73. P. 261–276.
  53. Johnson-Delaney A., 2017. Ferret Medicine and Surgery // Taylor and Francis Group. LLC. 512 P.
  54. Kikusui T., Nakanishi K., Nakagawa R., Nagasawa M., Mogi K., et al., 2011. Cross fostering experiments suggest that mice songs are innate // PLoS ONE 6(3): e17721. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017721
  55. Knudsen E.I., 2004. Sensitive periods in the development of brain and behavior // Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. V. 16. P. 1412–1425.
  56. Kotenkova E.V., Romachenko A.V., Ambaryan A.V., Maltsev A.N., 2019. Effect of early experience on neuronal and behavioral responses to con- and heterospecific odors in closely related Mus taxa: Epigenetic contribution in formation of precopulatory isolation // BMC Evolutionary Biology. V. 19 (Suppl. 1): 51.
  57. Kruczek M., 2007. Recognition of kin in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) // Physiology and Behavior. V. 90. P. 483–489.
  58. Lode T., 2008. Kin recognition versus familiarity in a solitary mustelid, the European polecat Mustela putorius // Comptes Rendus Biologies. V. 331. P. 248–254.
  59. Lohmiller J.L., Swing S.P., 2006. Reproduction and breeding // The laboratory rat, 2nd edition / Suckow M.A., Weisbroth S.H., Franklin C.L. (Eds). California: Elsevier Academic. P. 147–164.
  60. Lu L., Mamiya T., Lu P., Niwa M., Mouri A., Zou L.B. et al., 2009. The long-lasting effects of cross-fostering on the emotional behavior in ICR mice // Behavioural Brain Research. V. 198. P. 172–178.
  61. Luchetti A., Oddi D., Lampis V., Centofante E., Felsani A., Battaglia M., D’Amato F.R., 2015. Early handling and repeated cross-fostering have opposite effect on mouse emotionality // Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 9:93.
  62. Malkesman O., Lavi-Avnon Y., Maayan R., Weizman A., 2008. A cross-fostering study in a genetic animal model of depression: Maternal behavior and depression-like symptoms // Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior. V. 91. P. 1–8.
  63. Manning C.J., Dewsbury D.A., Wakeland E.K., Potts W.K., 1995. Communal nesting and communal nursing in house mice, Mus musculus domesticus // Animal Behaviour. V. 50. P. 741–751.
  64. Mateo J.M., 2002. Kin-recognition abilities and nepotism as a function of sociality // Proceedings of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences. V. 269. P. 721–727.
  65. Mateo J.M., Johnston R.E., 2000. Kin recognition and the “armpit effect”: evidence of self-referent phenotype matching // Proceedings of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences. V. 267. P. 695–700.
  66. Mateo J.M., Johnston R.E., 2003. Kin recognition by self-referent phenotype matching: weighing the evidence // Animal Cognition. V. 6. P. 73–76.
  67. Mateo J.M., Holmes WG., 2004. Cross-fostering as a means to study kin recognition // Animal Behaviour. V. 68. P. 1451–1459.
  68. McCarty R., 2017. Cross-fostering: Elucidating the effects of gene × environment interactions on phenotypic development // Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. V. 73. P. 219–254.
  69. McCarty R., Southwick C.H., 1977. Cross-species fostering: effects on the olfactory preference of Onychomys torridus and Peromyscus leucopus // Behavioral Biology. V. 19. P. 255–260.
  70. McCarty R., Southwick C.H., 1979. Parental environment: Effects on survival, growth and aggressive behaviors of 2 Rodent Species // Developmental Psychobiology. V. 12. P. 269–279.
  71. McDonald D.L., Forslund L.G., 1978. The development of social preferences in the voles Microtus montanus and Microtus canicaudus: effects of cross-fostering // Behavioral Biology. V. 22. P. 497–508.
  72. McGuire B., Novak M., 1987. The effects of cross-fostering on the development of social preferences in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) // Behavioral and Neural Biology. V. 47. P. 167–172.
  73. Meek L.R., Dittel P.L., Sheehan M.C., Chan J.Y., Kjolhaug S.R., 2001. Effects of stress during pregnancy on maternal behavior in mice // Physiology and Behavior. V. 72. P. 473–479.
  74. Murphy M.R., 1980. Sexual preferences of male hamsters: importance of preweaning and adult experience, vaginal secretion, and olfactory or vomeronasal sensation // Behavioral and Neural Biology. V. 30. P. 323–340.
  75. Oddi D., Luchetti A., D’Amato F.R., 2017. Impact of Postnatal Manipulations on Offspring Development in Rodents // Handbook of Neurobehavioral Genetics and Phenotyping. Handbook of Neurobehavioral Genetics and Phenotyping. Ed. V. Tucci. 395–416.
  76. Patris B., Baudoin C., 2000. A comparative study of parental care between two rodent species: implications for the mating system of the mound-building mouse Mus spicilegus // Behavioural Processes. V. 51. P. 35–43.
  77. Porter R.H., Matochik J.A., Makin J.W., 1983. Evidence for phenotype matching in spiny mice (Acomys cahirinus) // Animal Behaviour. V. 31. P. 978–984.
  78. Priebe K., Brake W.G., Romeo R.D., Sisti H.M., Mueller A., McEwen B.S., Francis D.D., 2005. Maternal influences on adult stress and anxiety-like behavior in C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ mice: A cross-fostering study // Developmental psychobiology. V. 47. P. 398–407.
  79. Pryce C.R., Feldon J., 2003. Long-term neurobehavioural impact of the postnatal environment in rats: Manipulations, effects and mediating mechanisms // Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. V. 27. P. 57–71.
  80. Quadagno D.M., Banks E.M., 1970. The effect of reciprocal cross-fostering on the behavior of two species of rodents, Mus musculus and Baiomys taylori ater // Animal Behaviour. V. 18. P. 379–388.
  81. Reading A.J., 1966. Effect of maternal environment on the behavior of inbred mice // Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. V. 62. P. 437–440.
  82. Rehling A., Trillmich F., 2008. Changing supply and demand by cross-fostering: Effects on the behaviour of pups and mothers in guinea pigs, Cavia aperea f. porcellus, and cavies, Cavia aperea // Animal Behaviour. V. 75. P. 1455– 1463.
  83. Rosenblatt J.S., 1969. The development of maternal responsiveness in the rat // American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. V. 39. P. 36–56.
  84. Schoknecht P.A., Cranford J.A., Akers R.M., 1985. Variability in milk composition of the domestic ferret (Mustela putorius) // Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. V. 81. P. 589–591.
  85. Shump A.U., 1975. Maternal Behavior of the Ferret (Mustela putorius). Thesis of PhD Dissertation. Doctoral degree in Zoology. Michigan State University. 101 p.
  86. Sloboda D.M., Hickey M., Roger H., 2011. Reproduction in females: The role of the early life environment // Human Reproduction Update. V. 17. № 2. P. 210–227.
  87. Surov A.V., Solovieva A.V., Minaev A.N., 2001. The olfactory sexual preferences of golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus): the effect of early social and sexual exherience // Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 9 / Marchlewska-Koj A., Lepri J., Müller-Schwarze D. (Eds). N.Y.: Springer Science. Business Media. LLC. P. 255–262.
  88. Taggart D.A., Schultz D.J., Fletcher T.P., Friend J.A., Smith I.G., Breed W.G., Temple-Smith P.D., 2010. Cross-fostering and short-term pouch young isolation in macropodoid marsupials: implications for conservation and species management // Macropods: The Biology of Kangaroos, Wallabies and Rat-kangaroos / Coulson G., Eldridge M. (Eds). Collingwood: CSIRO PUBLISHING. P. 263–279.
  89. Taylor P.D., Poston L., 2007.Developmental programming of obesity in mammals // Experimental Physiology. V. 92. № 2. P. 287–298.
  90. Vasilieva N.Y., Lai S.-C., Petrova E.V., Johnston R.E., 2001. Development of species preferences in two hamsters, Phodopus campbelli and Phodopus sungorus: Effects of cross-fostering // Ethology. V. 107. P. 217–236.
  91. Voznessenskaya V.V., Parfyonova V.M., Wysoki C.J., 1995. Induced olfactory sensitivity in rodents: a general phenomenon // Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology. V. 93. P. 399–406.
  92. Voznessenskaya V.V., Feoktistova N.Yu., Wysocki C.J., 1999. Is there a time during neonatal development for maximal imprinting of odor? // Advances in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates. Proceedinds of the 8-th International Symposium on Chemical Signals in Vertebrates / Johnston R.E., Muller-Schwarze D., Sorensen P. (Eds). N.Y.: Kluwer Academic. P. 617–622.
  93. Wigger A., Loerscher P., Weissenbacher P., Holsboer F., Landgraf R., 2001. Cross-fostering and cross-breeding of HAB and LAB rats: a genetic rat model of anxiety // Behavior Genetics. V. 31. P. 371–382.
  94. Wuensch K.L., 1992. Fostering house mice onto rats and deer mice: Effects on response to species odors // Animal Learning and Behavior. V. 20. P. 253–258.

Copyright (c) 2023 В.В. Стрельцов, М.В. Некрасова, А.Н. Мальцев, А.А. Петрин, Е.В. Котенкова

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies