Role of SiO2 in the Formation of Hydrate Phases in the Presence of СН4/CO2

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The effect of silicon dioxide nanoparticles on the formation of hydrate phases in the presence of CH4/CO2 has been studied. The theoretical experiment has been carried out by molecular dynamics methods at initial pressures in the system of 2.4 and 1.2 MPa and a temperature of 271 K for methane and carbon dioxide systems. The results showed that in the presence of silicon dioxide nanoparticles, the induction time of the methane hydrate formation decreased by 79%, and the amount of methane trapped in the hydrate cavity increased by 55.8% at a pressure of 2.4 MPa. In the presence of silicon dioxide nanoparticles, the induction time for the formation of carbon dioxide hydrate decreased by 62%, and the amount of carbon dioxide trapped in the hydrate cavity increased by 27.8% at a pressure of 1.2 MPa.

Авторлар туралы

Yu. Bozhko

Novosibirsk State University; Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: bozhko@niic.nsc.ru
630090, Novosibirsk, Russia; 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia

R. Zhdanov

Novosibirsk State University; Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: bozhko@niic.nsc.ru
630090, Novosibirsk, Russia; 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia

K. Gets

Novosibirsk State University; Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: bozhko@niic.nsc.ru
630090, Novosibirsk, Russia; 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia

O. Subbotin

Novosibirsk State University; Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: bozhko@niic.nsc.ru
630090, Novosibirsk, Russia; 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia

V. Belosludov

Novosibirsk State University; Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: bozhko@niic.nsc.ru
630090, Novosibirsk, Russia; 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Baidakov V.G. // Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2022. V. 92. № 4. P. 611. https://doi.org/10.1134/S107036322204003X
  2. Nagornov I.A., Mokrushin A.S., Simonenko E.P. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 4. P. 539. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622040143
  3. Sycheva G.A. // Glass Phys. Chem. 2021. V. 47. № 1. P. S41. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1087659621070105
  4. Cheng Z., Zhao Y., Liu W. et al. // J. Natural Gas Sci. Engineer. 2020. V. 79. P. 103375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103375
  5. Pahlavanzadeh H., Khanlarkhani M., Rezaei S. et al. // Fuel. 2019. V. 253. P. 1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.05.010
  6. Maiti M., Ranjan R., Chaturvedi E. et al. // J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 2021. V. 42. № 3. P. 338. https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2019.1680380
  7. Li A., Luo D., Jiang L. et al. // Sep. Sci. Technol. 2019. V. 54. № 15. P. 2498. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2018.1548481
  8. Adibi N., Mohammadi M., Ehsani M.R. et al. // J. Natural Gas Sci. Engineer. 2020. V. 84. P. 103690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103690
  9. Liang S., Rozmanov D., Kusalik P.G. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011. V. 13. № 44. P. 19856. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CP21810G
  10. Bagherzadeh S.A., Englezos P., Alavi S. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2012. V. 116. № 10. P. 3188. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp2086544
  11. Moon C., Hawtin R.W., Rodger P.M. // Faraday Discussions. 2007. V. 136. P. 367. https://doi.org/10.1039/B618194P
  12. Prasad P.S.R., Chari V.D., Sharma D.V. et al. // Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2012. V. 318. P. 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2012.01.012
  13. Moon C., Taylor P.C., Rodger P.M. // Can. J. Phys. 2003. V. 81. № 1–2. P. 451. https://doi.org/10.1139/P03-035
  14. Moon C., Taylor P.C., Rodger P.M. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003. V. 125. № 16. P. 4706. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja028537v
  15. Antonov D.V., Donskoy I.G., Gaidukova O.S. et al. // Environ. Res. 2022. P. 113990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113990
  16. Antonov D.V., Donskoy I.G., Gaidukova O.S. et al. // Fuel. 2022. V. 325. P. 124771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124771
  17. Gaidukova O., Misyura S., Razumov D. et al. // Appl. Sci. 2022. V. 12. № 12. P. 5953. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12125953
  18. Misyura S.Y., Donskoy I.G., Manakov A.Y. et al. // Flow, Turbulence and Combustion. 2022. V. 109. № 1. P. 175. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/ s10494-022-00325-x
  19. Semenov A.P., Mendgaziev R.I., Stoporev A.S. et al. // Chem. Eng. Sci. 2022. V. 255. P. 117670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2022.117670
  20. Semenov A.P., Mendgaziev R.I., Stoporev A.S. et al. // Data in Brief. 2022. P. 108289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.108289
  21. Semenov M.E., Pavelyev R.S., Stoporev A.S. et al. // Petroleum Chem. 2022. V. 62. № 2. P. 127. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0965544122060019
  22. Meleshkin A.V., Bartashevich M.V., Glezer V.V. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019. V. 493. P. 847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.276
  23. Meleshkin A.V., Marasanov N.V. // J. Engineer. Thermophys. 2021. V. 30. № 4. P. 699. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1810232821040135
  24. Meleshkin A.V., Shkoldina A.A. // J. Eng. Thermophys. 2021. V. 30. № 4. P. 693. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1810232821040123
  25. Meleshkin A.V., Bartashevich M.V., Glezer V.V. et al. // J. Eng. Thermophys. 2020. V. 29. № 2. P. 264. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S18102328200-20083
  26. Meleshkin A.V., Bartashevich M.V., Glezer V.V. // J. Eng. Thermophys. 2020. V. 29. № 2. P. 279. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S181023282-0020101
  27. Walsh M.R., Koh C.A., Sloan E.D. et al. // Science. 2009. V. 326. № 5956. P. 1095. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1174010
  28. Walsh M.R., Rainey J.D., Lafond P.G. et al. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011. V. 13. № 44. P. 19951. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CP21899A
  29. Walsh M.R., Beckham G.T., Koh C.A. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2011. V. 115. № 43. P. 21241. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp206483q
  30. Jacobson L.C., Molinero V.A. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2010. V. 114. № 21. P. 7302. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp1013576
  31. Jacobson L.C., Hujo W., Molinero V. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2009. V. 113. № 30. P. 10298. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp903439a
  32. Skelton A.A., Fenter P., Kubicki J.D. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2011. V. 115. № 5. P. 2076. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp109446d
  33. Rodger P.M., Smith W., Forester T.R. // Fluid Phase Equilib. 1996. V. 116. P. 326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3812(95)02903-6
  34. Berendsen H.J.C., van der Spoel D., van Drunen R. // Computer Phys. Commun. 1995. V. 91. № 1–3. P. 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E
  35. Abascal J.L.F., Sanz E., Fernandez R.G. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 2005. V. 122. P. 234511. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1931662
  36. Goodbody S.J., Watanabe K., MacGowan D. et al. // J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1991. V. 87. № 13. P. 1951. https://doi.org/10.1039/FT9918701951
  37. Ferdows M., Ota M. // Chem. Eng. Technol.: Industrial Chemistry-Plant Equipment-Process Engineering-Biotechnology. 2005. V. 28. № 2. P. 168. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200407056

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2.

Жүктеу (100KB)
Метадеректер
3.

Жүктеу (92KB)
Метадеректер
4.

Жүктеу (74KB)
Метадеректер
5.

Жүктеу (75KB)
Метадеректер

© Ю.Ю. Божко, Р.К. Жданов, К.В. Гец, О.С. Субботин, В.Р. Белослудов, 2023

Осы сайт cookie-файлдарды пайдаланады

Біздің сайтты пайдалануды жалғастыра отырып, сіз сайттың дұрыс жұмыс істеуін қамтамасыз ететін cookie файлдарын өңдеуге келісім бересіз.< / br>< / br>cookie файлдары туралы< / a>