Electron Transport in Perovskite-Type Ca0.5 – xSr0.5LuxMnO3 – δ Manganites

E. I. Konstantinova; Константинова Е. И.; V. A. Litvinov; Литвинов В. А.; A. D. Koryakov; Коряков А. Д.; I. A. Leonidov; Леонидов И. А.

doi:10.31857/S0044457X23600536

Electron Transport in Perovskite-Type Ca0.5 – xSr0.5LuxMnO3 – δ Manganites

Authors: Konstantinova E.I.¹, Litvinov V.A.¹, Koryakov A.D.¹, Leonidov I.A.¹
Affiliations:
1. Institute of Solid State Chemistry, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue: Vol 68, No 10 (2023)
Pages: 1398-1404
Section: СИНТЕЗ И СВОЙСТВА НЕОРГАНИЧЕСКИХ СОЕДИНЕНИЙ
URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0044-457X/article/view/140305
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X23600536
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LSXZZL
ID: 140305

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

Perovskite-type Ca0.5 – xSr0.5LuxMnO3 – δ (x = 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20) manganites have been prepared in air using a citrate–nitrate process for preparing precursors. At room temperature, the x = 0.05, 0.10, and 0.15 samples have an orthorhombic structure (space group Pbnm); when x = 0.2, a tetragonal structure (space group I4/mcm) is formed. The increase in unit cell volume in response to rising lutetium concentration in the samples is due to an increase in Mn3+ concentration necessary to ensure n-type electrical conductivity σ. The temperature-activated electrical conductivity is consistent with the adiabatic transport mechanism of small polarons. The increase in magnitude of the Seebeck coefficient S in response to rising temperature is due to the decrease in the concentration of Mn3+ ions via their disproportionation to Mn2+ and Mn4+ ions. The S(T) and σ(T) temperature dependences under the condition where δ ⁓ 0 have been used to calculate the equilibrium constants of the disproportionation reaction, charge carrier concentrations and mobilities.

Keywords

manganites, perovskite, electrical conductivity, Seebeck coefficient

References

Wang Y., Sui Y., Wang X., Su W. // J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2009. V. 42. P. 055010. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/42/5/055010
Bhaskar A., Liu C.-J., Yuan J.J. // J. Electron. Mater. 2012. V. 41. P. 2338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-012-2159-6
Löhnert R., Töpfer J. // J. Solid State Chem. 2022. V. 315. P. 123437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2022.123437
Madre M.A., Amaveda H., Dura O.J. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2023. V. 954. P. 170201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170201
Ohtaki M. // J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2011. V. 119. P. 770. https://doi.org/10.2109/jcersj2.119.770
Kennedy B.J., Saines P.J., Zhou Q. et al. // J. Solid State Chem. 2008. V. 181. P. 2639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2008.06.022
Федорова О.М., Ведмидь Л.Б., Балакирева В.Б. и др. // Неорган. материалы. 2021. Т. 57. № 4. С. 412. Fedorova O.M., Vedmid’ L.B., Balakireva V.B. et al. // Inorg. Mater. 2021. V. 57. P. 392. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002337X21040047
Konstantinova E.I., Leonidov I.A., Markov A.A. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020. V. 8. P. 16497. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA03731A
Konstantinova E.I., Leonidova O.N., Chukin A.V., Leonidov I.A. // Mater. Lett. 2021. V. 283. P. 128803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.128803
Mizusaki J., Mori N., Takai H. et al. // Solid State Ionics. 2000. V. 129. P. 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(99)00323-9
Evdou A., Georgitsis T., Matsouka C. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2022. V. 12. P. 3461. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12193461
Antipinskaya E.A., Politov B.V., Petrova S.A. et al. // J. Energy Storage. 2022. V. 53. P. 105175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.105175
Kraus W., Nolze G. // Powder Cell for Windows – Version 2.4 – Structure Visualisation/Manipulation. Powder Pattern Calculation and Profile Fitting Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing. 2000. Berlin, Germany.
Cusack N., Kendall P. // Proc. Phys. Soc. 1958. V. 72. P. 898. https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1328/72/5/429
Chimaissem O., Dabrowski B., Kolesnik S. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2001. V. 64. P. 134412. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.64.134412
Shannon R.D. // Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A. 1976. V. 32. P. 751. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567739476001551
Goldyreva E.I., Leonidov I.A., Patrakeev M.V. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2015. V. 638. P. 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.03.048
Austin I.G., Mott N.F. // Adv. Phys. 2001. V. 50. P. 757. https://doi.org/10.1080/00018730110103249
Kuo J.H., Anderson H.U., Sparlin D.M. // J. Solid State Chem. 1989. V. 83. P. 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4596(89)90053-4
Moskvin A.S. // J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2013. V. 25. P. 085601. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/25/8/085601
Moskvin A.S. // Phys. Rev. B. 2009. V. 79. P. 115102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.115102
Loktev V.M., Pogorelov Y.G. // Low Temp. Phys. 2000. V. 26. P. 171. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.593890
Леонидов И.А., Константинова Е.И., Патракеев М.В. и др. // Неорган. материалы. 2017. Т. 53. № 6. С. 594. Leonidov I.A., Konstantinova E.I., Patrakeev M.V. et al. // Inorg. Mater. 2017. V. 53. P. 583. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168517060097
Leonidov I.A., Konstantinova E.I., Patrakeev M.V. et al. // J. Solid State Electrochem. 2017. V. 21. P. 2099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-01-3571-x
Konstantinova E.I., Ryzhkov M.A. Leonidova O.N. et al. // J. Solid State Electrochem. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-023-05386-0