Simulation of Spin Selectivity of Electrical Conductivity of Chiral Platinum Nanotubes

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

To study the electronic and spin properties of single-walled platinum nanotubes, two rows of chiral nanotubes have been calculated by the relativistic method of symmetrized linearized augmented cylindrical waves: Pt(5, n2) with 1 ≤ n2 ≤ 4 and Pt(10, n2) with 1 ≤ n2 ≤ 9 and radii from 2.24 to 7.78 Å. In all tubes, the intersection of the top of the valence band and the bottom of the conduction band with the Fermi level is observed, which is characteristic of compounds with a semi-metallic band structure. The spin–orbit coupling manifests itself as a splitting of nonrelativistic dispersion curves, which can exceed 0.5 eV for near-Fermi bands and decreases upon transition to the internal states of the valence band and nanotubes of larger diameter. The spin densities of states for electrons with spin up and down at the Fermi level are noticeably different, which can be used to create pure spin currents through nanotubes using alternating electrical voltage. The (5, 3) and (10, 7) nanotubes are the most suitable for this.

About the authors

P. N. D’yachkov

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: p_dyachkov@rambler.ru
119991, Moscow, Russia

N. A. Lomakin

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: p_dyachkov@rambler.ru
119991, Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Oshima Y., Koizumi H., Mouri K. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2002. V. 65. P. 121401(R). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.121401
  2. Oshima Y., Onga A., Takayanagi K. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003. V. 91. P. 205503. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.205503
  3. Huang Z., Raciti D., Yu S. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016. V. 138. P. 6332. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b01328
  4. Bi Y., Lu G. // Electrochem. Commun. 2009. V. 11. P. 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2008.10.023
  5. Lou X.W., Archer L.A., Yang Z. // Adv. Mater. 2008. V. 20. P. 3987. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200800854
  6. Zhang G., Sun S., Cai M. et al. // Scient. Rep. 2013. V. 3. P. 1526. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01526
  7. Hendren W.R., Murphy A., Evans P. et al. // J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2008. V. 20. P. 362203. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/20/36/362203
  8. Oshima Y., Mouri K., Hirayama H. et al. // J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2006. V. 75. P. 053705. https://doi.org/10.1143/jpsj.75.053705
  9. Del Valle M., Tejedor C., Cuniberti G. // Phys. Rev. B. 2006. V. 74. P. 045408. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.045408
  10. Rajalaa T., Kronberga R., Backhouse R. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2020. V. 265. P. 118582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118582
  11. Ono T., Hirose K. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005. V. 94. P. 206806. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.206806
  12. Zhang K., Zhang H. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2014. V. 118. P. 635. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp410056u
  13. Shimada T., Ishii Y., Kitamura T. // Phys. Rev. B. 2011. V. 84. P. 165452. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.165452
  14. Manrique D.Zs., Cserti J., Lambert C.J. // Phys. Rev. B. 2010. V. 81. P. 073103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.073103
  15. Andersen O.K. // Phys. Rev. B. 1970. V. 2. P. 883. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.2.883
  16. Bordoloit A.K., Auluck S. // J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 1983. V. 13. P. 2101. https://https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4608/13/10/019
  17. Wern H., Courths R., Leschik G. et al. // Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter. 1985. V. 60. P. 293. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01304449
  18. Herrera-Suárez H.J., Rubio-Ponce A., Olguín D. // Revista Mexicana de Física. 2012. V. 58. P. 46. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1311.5929
  19. Matanović I., Kent P.R.C., Garzon F.H. et al. // J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013. V. 160. P. F548. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.047306jes
  20. Xiao L., Wang L. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006. V. 430. P. 319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2006.09.032
  21. Hui L., Pederiva F., Guanghou W. et al. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003. V. 381. P. 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2003.08.110
  22. Konar S., Gupta B.C. // Phys. Rev. B. 2008. V. 78. P. 235414. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.235414
  23. Дьячков П.Н., Дьячков Е.П. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2020. Т. 65. № 8. С. 1073. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X20070077
  24. Krasnov D.O., Khoroshavin L.O., D’yachkov P.N. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019. V. 64. P. 108. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023619010145
  25. D’yachkov E.P., D’yachkov P.N. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2019. V. 123. P. 26005. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b07610
  26. D'yachkov P.N., Krasnov D.O. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 2019. V. 720. P. 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2019.02.006
  27. Ando T. // J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2000. V. 69. P. 1757. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.74.777
  28. Minot E.D., Yaish Y., Sazonova V. et al. // Nature. 2004. V. 428. P. 536. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02425
  29. Kuemmeth F., Ilani S., Ralph D.C. et al. // Nature. 2008. V. 452. P. 448. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06822
  30. Дьячков П.Н. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2022. Т. 67. № 10. С. 1441. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X22100385
  31. D’yachkov P.N. Quantum Chemistry of Nanotubes: Electronic Cylindrical Waves; CRC Press. London: Taylor and Francis, 2019. 212 p.
  32. D’yachkov P.N., Makaev. D.V. // Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2016. V. 116. P. 316. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.25030
  33. Banerjee-Ghosh K., Dor O.B., Tassinari F. et al. // Science. 2018. V. 360. P. 1331. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4265
  34. Naaman R., Waldeck D.H. // Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2015. V. 66. P. 263. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040214-121554
  35. Gutierrez R., D́ıaz E., Gaul C. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2013. V. 117. P. 22276. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp401705x
  36. Yang S.H. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021. V. 16. P. 120502. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0039147
  37. Yang S.H., Naaman R., Paltiel Y. et al. // Nat. Rev. Phys. 2021. V. 3. P. 328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00302-9
  38. Michaeli K., Kantor-Uriel N., Naamanm R. et al. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016. V. 45. P. 6478. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00369A
  39. Bercioux D., Lucignano P. // Rep. Prog. Phys. V. 78. P. 106001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/78/10/106001
  40. Manchon A., Koo H.C., Nitta J. et al. // Nat. Mater. 2015. V. 14. P. 871. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4360

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2.

Download (334KB)
Indexing metadata
3.

Download (804KB)
Indexing metadata
4.

Download (137KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2023 П.Н. Дьячков, Н.А. Ломакин

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies