Email this article 
MODELLING OF THE NEUTRINO TAGGING SYSTEM FOR THE NEAR DETECTOR IN THE P2O EXPERIMENT
- Authors: Goryachev V.N.1, Novoskoltsev F.N.1, Sinyukov R.Y.1, Sokolov A.A.2
-
Affiliations:
- National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”– IHEP
- Issue: Vol 87, No 6 (2024)
- Pages: 559-570
- Section: ЭЛЕМЕНТАРНЫЕ ЧАСТИЦЫ И ПОЛЯ. Эксперимент
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0044-0027/article/view/281918
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044002724060132
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HOTXMF
- ID: 281918
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This paper describes the method of neutrino tagging in neutrino experiments and the principles of its realization. The neutrino tagging method consists in the kinematic reconstruction of the neutrino formation reaction – the decay π±( ±) → µ± + νµ(νµ) – by measuring the parameters of the charged particles – parent meson and muon – using a tagging station. This allows us to recover the energy, direction and point of neutrino formation with a high accuracy. A description of the neutrino tagging method and the potential advantages of the resulting beam for short-base experiments are presented. The scheme of the neutrino tagging station is considered and its operation is modeled.
About the authors
V. N. Goryachev
National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”– IHEPProtvino, Russia
F. N. Novoskoltsev
National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”– IHEPProtvino, Russia
R. Yu. Sinyukov
National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”– IHEPProtvino, Russia
A. A. Sokolov
Email: sokolov_a@ihep.ru
References
- Б. М. Понтекорво, ЖЭТФ 33, 549 (1957).
- Б. М. Понтекорво, ЖЭТФ 34, 247 (1958).
- Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and S. Sakata, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 870 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1143/ptp.28.870
- Б. М. Понтекорво, ЖЭТФ 53, 1717 (1967).
- A. V. Akindinov, E. G. Anassontzis, G. Anton, M. Ardid, J. Aublin, B. Baret, V. Bertin, S. Bourret, C. Bozza, M. Bruchner, R. Bruijn, J. Brunner, M. Chabab, N. Chau, A. S. Chepurnov, M. Colomer Molla, et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 758 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7259-5
- S. K. Raut, R. S. Singh, and S. U. Sankar, Phys. Lett. B 696, 227 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2010.12.029
- A. Dighe, S. Goswami, and S. Ray, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 261802 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.105.261802
- B. Pontecorvo, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 25, 257 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02813638
- Ф. Н. Новоскольцев, Р. Ю. Синюков, А. А. Соколов, Изв. РАН. Сер. физ. 87, 1120 (2023). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0367676523702010
- D. C. Carey, R. J. Stefanski, and L. C. Teng, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 18, 755 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1109/tns.1971.4326174
- V. B. Anikeev, S. V. Belikov, S. N. Gurzhiev, A. G. Denisov, S. P. Denisov, N. N. Fedjakin, V. I. Kochetkov, V. M. Korablev, V. I. Koreshev, V. V. Lipaev, S. V. Los, V. N. Mikhailin, A. M. Rybin, A. N. Sytin, A. G. Bogdanov, T. M. Kirina, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 419, 596 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-9002(98)00837-7
- G. Aglieri Rinella, D. Alvarez Feito, R. Arcidiacono, C. Biino, S. Bonacini, A. Ceccucci, S. Chiozzi, E. Cortina Gil, A. Cotta Ramusino, H. Danielsson, J. Degrange, M. Fiorini, L. Federici, E. Gamberini, A. Gianoli, J. Kaplon, et al., JINST 14, P07010 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/P07010
- A. Lai, IEEE, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 1 (2018).
- H.F.W. Sadrozinski, S. Ely, V. Fadeyev, Z. Galloway, J. Ngo, C. Parker, B. Petersen, A. Seiden, A. Zatserklyaniy, N. Cartiglia, F. Marchetto, M. Bruzzi, R. Mori, M. Scaringella, and A. Vinattieri, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 730, 226 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2013.06.033
- M. Perrin-Terrin, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 465 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10397-8
- F. N. Novoskoltsev, R. Yu. Sinyukov, and A. A. Sokolov, Phys. At. Nucl. 86, 1450 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/s1063778824010393
Supplementary files
