Acute bronchitis – modern possibilities of mucactive therapy

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. Analysis of the clinical effectiveness and safety of erdosteine use in comparison with standard (real practice) mucoactive therapy in patients with acute bronchitis (АВ) in adults.
Materials and methods. The observational program included 100 adult patients with АВ, 50 of them (group 1) received erdosteine, the group 2 also included 50 patients who received acetylcysteine, bromhexine and other mucolytics (real clinical practice). The following were assessed: cough severity, average time for resolution of night and daytime cough, satisfaction with treatment, NO concentration in exhaled air, levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6).
Results. The average duration of relief of severe daytime cough requiring continued therapy was: in group 1 – 3.7±0.46 days, night cough – 1.14±0.94 days. In the second group, daytime cough was relieved in 3.8±0.4 days, night cough – 1.08±0.7 days. The duration of mucoactive therapy in group 1 was 5.32±0.82 days, in group 2 this figure was 8.5±1.4 days (p<0.05). The number of АВ patients with a significant reduction in the severity of productive cough (1 point on cough severity scale) on the 6th day from the beginning of treatment in group 1 (erdosteine) amounted to 32 (64%), in group 2 – 27 (54%). Satisfaction with the treatment was higher in the group receiving erdosteine: according to the indicators "very satisfied" and "extremely satisfied" the patients of the group 1 – 42 – were the leaders in comparison with the group 2, where these positions were marked by 28 patients. The level of CRP in patients with АВ in group 1 was 24.7±21.24 mg/l, in group 2 – 16.37±16.5 mg/l, which indicates the viral etiology of the process and no need in the prescription of antimicrobial drugs. For the first time in Russian practice, the following were determined: the level of IL-6, which in the group 1 was 10.3±6.7 pc/ml; in the group 2 – 10.03±3.94 pc/ml; the level of exhaled NO in group 1 was 16.5±5.1 ppb, in group 2 – 14.9±4.6 ppb (the norm is up to 25 ppb). These indicators, against the background of mucoactive therapy, decreased to normal values by 6th day.
Conclusion. The findings expand our understanding of АВ in adults. New results have been obtained on the role of CRP, IL-6 and NO in exhaled air during АВ. The use of erdosteine was accompanied by a significant mucoactive effect in the form of a pronounced regression of cough in patients with АВ compared to the comparison group in shorter term.

About the authors

Andrey A. Zaitsev

Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital; Russian Biotechnological University; Central Research Institute of Epidemiology

Author for correspondence.
Email: a-zaicev-a@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0934-7313

доктор медицинских наук, профессор, гл. пульмонолог ГВКГ имени академика Н.Н. Бурденко, зав. кафедры пульмонологии (с курсом аллергологии) Медицинского института непрерывного образования РОСБИОТЕХ, вед. научный сотрудник ЦНИИ эпидемиологии

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow; Moscow

Ekaterina A. Filon

Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital

Email: filon_94@mail.ru

врач-пульмонолог

Russian Federation, Moscow

Yulia I. Storozheva

Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital

Email: a-zaicev-a@yandex.ru

врач-терапевт

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Worrall G. Acute bronchitis. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54(2):238-9. PMID: 18272643
  2. Wenzel R, Fowler A. Acute Bronchitis. Clinical practice. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(20):2125-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp061493
  3. Woodhead M, Blasi F, Ewig S, et al. Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections – full version. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(Suppl. 6):E1-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03672.x
  4. Зайцев А.А., Кулагина И.Ц. Острый бронхит. Фарматека. 2015;14(307):89-95 [Zaitsev AA, Kulagina ITs. Acute bronchitis. Pharmacate. 2015;14(307):89-95 (in Russian)].
  5. Зайцев А.А. Направления фармакотерапии и профилактики острых респираторных вирусных инфекций. Русский медицинский журнал. 2009;17(23):1525-9 [Zaitsev AA. Directions of pharmacotherapy and prevention of acute respiratory viral infections. Russian Medical Journal. 2009;17(23):1525-9 (in Russian)].
  6. Ott S, Rohde G, Lepper P, et al. The impact of viruses in lower respiratory tract infections of the adult. Part II: Acute bronchitis, acute exacerbated COPD, pneumonia, and influenza. Pneumologie. 2010;64(1):18-27. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215197
  7. Smith SM, Fahey T, Smucny J, Becker LA. Antibiotics for acute bronchitis. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2017;6(6):CD000245. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000245.pub4
  8. Зайцев А.А., Оковитый С.В., Крюков Е.В. Кашель. Практическое пособие для врачей. М., 2015 [Zaitsev AA, Okovityi SV, Kriukov EV. Kashel'. Prakticheskoe posobie dlia vrachei. Moscow, 2015 (in Russian)].
  9. Зайцев А.А., Клочков О.И., Горелов А.В. Острые респираторные вирусные инфекции: перспективы противовирусной терапии. Вестник семейной медицины. 2009;5:4-10 [Zaitsev AA, Klochkov OI, Gorelov AV. Acute respiratory viral infections: prospects for antiviral therapy. Bulletin of Family Medicine. 2009;5:4-10 (in Russian)].
  10. Tackett K, Atkins A. Evidence-based acute bronchitis therapy. J Pharm Pract. 2012;25(6):586-90. doi: 10.1177/0897190012460826
  11. Dal Negro RW, Visconti M, Micheletto C, Tognella S. Changes in blood ROS, e-NO, and some pro-inflammatory mediators in bronchial secretions following erdosteine or placebo: A controlled study in current smokers with mild COPD. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2008;21(2):304-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2007.07.004
  12. Park JS, Park MY, Cho YJ, et al. Anti-inflammatory effect of erdosteine in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 Cells. Inflammation. 2016;39(4):1573-81. doi: 10.1007/s10753-016-0393-4
  13. Zanasi A, Menarni A. Erdosteine versus N-acetylcysteine in the treatment of exacerbation of chronic bronchpneumopathies. Med Praxis. 1991;12(4):207-17.
  14. Olivieri D, Donno M, Casalini A, et al. Activity of erdosteine on mucociliary transport in patients affected by chronic bronchitis. Respiration. 1991;58(2):91-4. doi: 10.1159/000195904
  15. Hayashi K, Hosoe H, Kaise T, Ohmori K. Protective effect of erdosteine against hypochlorous acid-induced acute lung injury and lipopolysaccharide-induced neutrophilic lung inflammation in mice. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2000;52(11):1411-6. doi: 10.1211/0022357001777414
  16. Sener G, Sehirli AO, Toklu HZ, et al. Erdosteine treatment attenuates oxidative stress and fibrosis in experimental biliary obstruction. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007;23(3):233-41. doi: 10.1007/s00383-006-1872-8
  17. Ricevuti G, Nazzone A, Uccelli E, et al. Influence of erdosteine, a mucolytic agent, on amoxicillin penetration into sputum in patients with an infective exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. Thorax. 1988;43(8):585-90. doi: 10.1136/thx.43.8.585
  18. Dal Negro RW, Wedzicha JA, Iversen M, et al. Effect of erdosteine on the rate and duration of COPD exacerbations: The RESTORE study. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(4):1700711. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00711-2017
  19. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2023. Available at: http://www.goldcopd.org/ Accessed: 15.08.2023.
  20. Синопальников А.И., Зайцев А.А. Современный взгляд на фармакотерапию обострений хронической обструктивной болезни легких. Лечащий врач. 2009;10:45-9. [Sinopalnikov AI, Zaitsev AA. A modern view of pharmacotherapy of exacerbations of chronic obstructive lung disease. Attending Doctor. 2009;10:45-9 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.21518/2079-701X-2017-18-14-20
  21. Cazzola M, Calzetta L, Page C, et al. Impact of erdosteine on chronic bronchitis and COPD: A meta-analysis. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2018;48:185-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.11.009
  22. Rogliani P, Matera M, Page C. Efficacy and safety profile of mucolytic/antioxidant agents in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A comparative analysis across erdosteine, carbocysteine, and N-acetylcysteine. Respir Res. 2019;20(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1078-y
  23. Balli F, Bergamini B, Calistru P, et al. Clinical effects of erdosteine in the treatment of acute respiratory tract diseases in children. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;45(1):16-22. doi: 10.5414/cpp45016
  24. Cazzola M, Page C, Rogliani P, et al. Multifaceted beneficial effects of erdosteine: More than a mucolytic agent. Drugs. 2020;80(17):1799-809. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01412-x

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Percentage of patients with absence (visits 2 and 3) of a productive cough (0–1 on the cough severity scale).

Download (51KB)
3. Fig. 2. Patient satisfaction with taking the drug by groups.

Download (64KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies