Interaction of a Relativistic Electron Beam and Electromagnetic Field in a Terahertz Cherenkov Generator with a Bragg Reflector

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

A 2.5D hybrid model is used to numerically study the interaction of a beam with a current of 2.5–7.5 kA and an electron energy of 345–510 keV and terahertz (364–368 GHz) electromagnetic field. It is shown that Bragg reflectors in an electrodynamic system with an overmode ratio of 49 make it possible to significantly suppress backward radiation and multiply increase the radiation power in the direction of the electron beam. Radiation pulses with a power of up to 330 MW are obtained in calculations with disregard of heat loss in the presence of a guiding magnetic field of 6 T.

About the authors

M. P. Deichuli

Institute of High-Current Electronics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: koshelev@lhfe.hcei.tsc.ru
Tomsk, 634055 Russia

V. I. Koshelev

Institute of High-Current Electronics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: koshelev@lhfe.hcei.tsc.ru
Tomsk, 634055 Russia

A. A. Petkun

Institute of High-Current Electronics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: koshelev@lhfe.hcei.tsc.ru
Tomsk, 634055 Russia

V. A. Chazov

Institute of High-Current Electronics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: koshelev@lhfe.hcei.tsc.ru
Tomsk, 634055 Russia

References

  1. Booske J.H., Dobbs R.J., Joye C.D. et al. // IEEE Trans. 2011. V. TST-1. № 1. P. 54. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2011.2151610
  2. San M.T., Ogura K., Kubota K. et al. // IEEE Trans. Pl2018. V. PS-46. № 3. P. 530. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2018.2796569
  3. Куркан И.К., Ростов В.В., Тотьменинов Е.М. // Письма ЖТФ. 1998. Т. 24. № 10. С. 43.
  4. Ansari M.A., Thottappan M. // IEEE Trans. 2019. V. PS-47. № 4. P. 1754. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2019.2904041
  5. Wang H., Xiao R., Chen C. et al. // IEEE Trans. 2021. V. ED-68. № 6. P. 3045. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2021.3075419
  6. Zhou N., Zhang X., Dang F. et al. // Phys. Plasmas. 2023. V. 30. № 1. Article No. 013102. https://doi.org/10.1063/S0124811
  7. Ogura K., Miyazava Y., Tanaka H. et al. // Plasma and Fusion Research: Regular Articles. 2007. V. 2. P. S1041. https://doi.org/10.1585/pfr.2.S1041
  8. Vlasov A.N., Shkvarunets A.G., Rodgers A.S. et al. // IEEE Trans. 2000. V. PS-28. № 3. P. 550. https://doi.org/10.1109/27.887671
  9. Бугаев С.П., Канавец В.И., Климов А.И. и др. // Письма ЖТФ. 1983. Т. 9. № 22. С. 1385.
  10. Бугаев С.П., Канавец В.И., Климов А.И. и др. // РЭ. 1987. Т. 32. № 7. С. 1488.
  11. Бугаев С.П., Канавец В.И., Кошелев В. И. и др. // РЭ. 1989. Т. 34. № 2. С. 400.
  12. Бугаев С.П., Канавец В.И., Кошелев В.И., Черепенин В.А. // Релятивистские многоволновые СВЧ-генераторы. Новосибирск: Наука, 1991.
  13. Koshelev V.I., Deichuly M.P. // AIP Conf. Proc. 1999. V. 474. № 1. P. 347.
  14. Deichuly M.P., Koshelev V.I., Pikunov V.M. et al. // AIP Conf. Proc. 2002. V. 65. № 1. № P. 287.
  15. Koshelev V.I., Deichuly M.P. // Proc.13th Int. Symp. on High Current Electronics / Eds. by B. Kovalchuk, G. Remnev. Tomsk, 25–29 Jul. 2004, Tomsk: IHCE SB RAS, 2004. P. 296.
  16. Дейчули М.П., Кошелев В.И. // РЭ. 2013. Т. 58. № 8. С. 829. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0033849413080020
  17. Ginzburg N.S., Malkin A.M., Sergeev A.S. et al. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016. V. 117. № 20. P. 204801. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.204801
  18. Gardelle J., Modin P., Bluem H.P. et al. // IEEE Trans. 2016. V. TST-6. № 3. P. 497. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2016.2543603
  19. Chazov V., Deichuly M., Koshelev V. // Proc. 7th Int. Congress on Energy Fluxes and Radiation Effects (EFRE), Tomsk 14–26 Sept. 2020. Tomsk: Publishing House of IAO SB RAS, 2020. P. 23. https://doi.org/10.1109/EFRE47760.2020.9242150
  20. Wang J., Wang G., Wang D. et al. // Scientific Reports. 2018. V. 8. № 6978. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25466-w
  21. Li S., Wang J., Wang D. // Scientific Reports. 2020. V. 10. № 336. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55525-9
  22. Chazov V., Deichuly M., Koshelev V., Petkun A. // Proc. 8th Int. Congress on Energy Fluxes and Radiation Effects (EFRE). Tomsk. 2–8 Oct. 2022 / Eds. by D. Sorokin, A. Grishkov. Tomsk: TPU Publishing House, 2022. P. 219. https://doi.org/10.56761/EFRE2022.S3-O-020502
  23. Дейчули М.П., Кошелев В.И., Петкун А.А., Чазов В.А. // Изв. вузов. Физика. 2023. Т. 66. № 6. С. 92. https://doi.org/10.17223/00213411/66/6/11
  24. Vlasov A.N., Ilyin A.S., Carmel Y. // IEEE Trans. 1998. V. PS-26. № 3. P. 605.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2.

Download (182KB)
3.

Download (56KB)
4.

Download (63KB)
5.

Download (87KB)
6.

Download (48KB)
7.

Download (126KB)
8.

Download (37KB)
9.

Download (105KB)
10.

Download (53KB)
11.

Download (860KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 М.П. Дейчули, В.И. Кошелев, А.А. Петкун, В.А. Чазов

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies