Comparative results of preimplantation genetic screening by array comparative genomic hybridization and new-generation sequencing
- Authors: Aleksandrova N.V.1, Shubina E.S.1, Ekimov A.N.1, Kodyleva T.A.1, Mukosey I.S.1, Makarova N.P.1, Kulakova E.V.1, Levkov L.A.1, Barkov I.Y.1, Trofimov D.Y.1, Sukhikh G.T.1
-
Affiliations:
- Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
- Issue: Vol 51, No 2 (2017)
- Pages: 269-273
- Section: Genomics. Transcriptomics
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0026-8933/article/view/163030
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026893317010022
- ID: 163030
Cite item
Abstract
Aneuploidies as quantitative chromosome abnormalities are a main cause of failed development of morphologically normal embryos, implantation failures, and early reproductive losses. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) allows a preselection of embryos with a normal karyotype, thus increasing the implantation rate and reducing the frequency of early pregnancy loss after IVF. Modern PGS technologies are based on a genome-wide analysis of the embryo. The first pilot study in Russia was performed to assess the possibility of using semiconductor new-generation sequencing (NGS) as a PGS method. NGS data were collected for 38 biopsied embryos and compared with the data from array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH). The concordance between the NGS and array-CGH data was 94.8%. Two samples showed the karyotype 47,XXY by array-CGH and a normal karyotype by NGS. The discrepancies may be explained by loss of efficiency of array-CGH amplicon labeling.
About the authors
N. V. Aleksandrova
Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Author for correspondence.
Email: alexandrova.ncagip@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 117997
E. S. Shubina
Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: alexandrova.ncagip@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 117997
A. N. Ekimov
Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: alexandrova.ncagip@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 117997
T. A. Kodyleva
Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: alexandrova.ncagip@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 117997
I. S. Mukosey
Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: alexandrova.ncagip@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 117997
N. P. Makarova
Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: alexandrova.ncagip@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 117997
E. V. Kulakova
Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: alexandrova.ncagip@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 117997
L. A. Levkov
Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: alexandrova.ncagip@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 117997
I. Yu. Barkov
Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: alexandrova.ncagip@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 117997
D. Yu. Trofimov
Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: alexandrova.ncagip@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 117997
G. T. Sukhikh
Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: alexandrova.ncagip@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 117997
Supplementary files
