Том 65, № 3 (2023)

This article discusses the general classification approaches and key features of different families of polymetallic deposits, with particular attention to the largest in Eurasia Ozernoe polymetallic deposit located in Western Transbaikalia and thoroughly explored 50 years ago. The main groups (or families) of polymetallic deposits in the English-language literature are identified by brief names: volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS), sedimentary exhalative (SEDEX), and Mississippi Valley type (MVT). Within these three families of deposits, there are many additional types/subtypes, a large number of which are mostly due to the incompleteness and inconsistency of accumulated knowledge on the genesis of polymetallic deposits. Overall, all Pb–Zn(Ag,Cu) deposits—both those that are considered syngenetic, forming on and near the seafloor (VMS and SEDEX), and epigenetic low-temperature ones (MVT)—demonstrate a wide range of features that distinguish and bring together these families. This also applies to the types and subtypes of mineral deposits identified within them. One of the most complex objects for geological–genetic classification is the Ozernoe deposit studied by the authors, which, in terms of the nature of the host rocks, is intermediate between the end members of all three families: SEDEX, VMS and MVT. The deposit is localized in volcanic–carbonate–terrigenous rocks of the Cambrian Oldynda formation, but the age and stratigraphic affiliation of the ore-bearing series remain a matter of debate. The Ozernoe deposit is a combination of massive sulfide and siderite ore beds, ore breccia horizons, low-carbonate aleuropelite members, limestones, fine detrital tuffites, lavas, and tuffs. The sulfide bodies are confined to several stratigraphic levels, and the main productive unit thickness reaches 230 m. The thickness is comprised of 12 mineral lodes, a series of stratified ore bodies separated by gangue layers of sedimentary and volcaniclastic rocks. The primary ore minerals are pyrite, sphalerite, and galena, while the minor minerals include magnetite, chalcopyrite, marcasite, tetrahedrite, and arsenopyrite. There are two main theories regarding the origin of the ore: volcanogenic–sedimentary and hydrothermal–metasomatic. The hydrothermal–sedimentary theory remains the prevailing hypothesis, but there are many indications that epigenetic hydrothermal–metasomatic and dynamic metamorphic processes have contributed to the formation of the deposit. These include the appearance of sulfide–quartz and quartz–carbonate–sulfide veins and vein zones in fine-grained “layered” ores, with large crystalline sphalerite and galena; multiple signs of ore recrystallization, including the formation of pyrite porphyroblasts and arsenopyrite metacrystals; and the formation of solid pyrrhotite and pyrrhotite–magnetite ores with a lenticular-striped, gneissic structure. These observations suggest that different processes, both hydrothermal–sedimentary and metamorphogenetic–metasomatic, were involved in the formation of the Ozernoe deposit. In other words, primary hydrothermal–sedimentary ores were redeposited by late hydrothermal solutions. Nevertheless, many issues concerning the genesis of the Ozernoe deposit remain unresolved.

The same Cenomanian (96.91 ± 0.88 and 96.5 ± 1.2 Ma) age of amphibole granodiorites of the magnetite and ilmenite series in the southern part of the Priiskovy massif has been established. Among the relatively homogeneous central ilmenite zone of the Sikhote-Alin orogenic belt, the local occurrence of magnetite rocks of the Priiskovy massif explains the distribution of deposits and ore occurrences of the studied site. All deposits and ore occurrences of tin within the boundaries of the Priiskovy massif are located in the zone of distribution of rocks of the ilmenite series (reducing conditions), and deposits and placers of gold and manifestations of polymetallic mineralization are located in the zone of rocks of the magnetite series (oxidizing conditions)