Effect of Endothelial Cells on Angiogenic Properties of Multipotent Stromal Cells from the Umbilical Cord during Angiogenesis Modeling in the Basement Membrane Matrix


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Short-term cell culturing on basement membrane matrix is a common and very convenient in vitro model of angiogenesis. We studied the possibility of interaction of multipotent stromal cells from the umbilical cord and Ea.hy926 endothelial cells on this model at the early and late periods of the experiment. Multipotent stromal cells alone and in combination with endothelial cells formed an unstable tubular network. Clusters formed after its disassembling later became the sprouting centers in co-culture of the two cell types, but not in pure culture of multipotent stromal cells. Multipotent stromal cells with CD31+ phenotype constitute the structural basis of newly formed stable 3D capillary-like network. Prolongation of the time of culturing and combination of the two in vitro models of angiogenesis (tubulogenesis and sprouting) allowed more complete assessment of the angiogenic potential of multipotent stromal cells.

About the authors

T. H. Fatkhudinov

V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Research Institute of Human Morphology; N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: fatkhudinov@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow; Moscow

A. V. El’chaninov

V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Research Institute of Human Morphology; N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: fatkhudinov@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow; Moscow

A. V. Makarov

V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Research Institute of Human Morphology; N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: fatkhudinov@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow; Moscow

E. Yu. Kananykhina

V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Research Institute of Human Morphology

Email: fatkhudinov@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

N. Yu. Usman

V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Research Institute of Human Morphology; N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: fatkhudinov@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow; Moscow

E. Sh. Raimova

N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: fatkhudinov@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow

D. V. Goldshtein

Medical Genetic Research Center

Email: fatkhudinov@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow

G. B. Bol’shakova

Research Institute of Human Morphology

Email: fatkhudinov@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow

I. V. Arutyunyan

V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Research Institute of Human Morphology

Email: fatkhudinov@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow


Copyright (c) 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies