Genetic determinants of flax genome integrity

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing methods have enabled development of an innovative approach to evaluation of genome stability and integrity. The depth of the coverage signal at a particular location of the genome may indicate the loss of DNA integrity in the region. In this work, the previously developed metric of local genome integrity that estimates the uniformity of coverage signal is considered a quantitative trait and a search for genetic variants associated with the uniformity of coverage signal in flax genome is performed. In particular, quantitative trait locus (xQTL) analyses (i.e., x Quantitiave Trait Loci, where x is the designation of an arbitrary quantitative characteristic associated with a particular genome region; for example, the level of gene expression, the degree of ribosome coverage, etc.) have been applied to identify genomic regions that most likely contribute to loss of genome integrity and are, probably, involved in the maintenance of genome stability. The analysis carried out using information on whole-genome sequence assembly of 100 flax samples enabled identification of genes potentially implicated in genome integrity maintenance in flax and, possibly, in plants in general and also revealed novel processes associated with the maintenance of genome integrity.

Авторлар туралы

A. Kanapin

St. Petersburg State University

St. Petersburg, Russia

A. Samsonova

St. Petersburg State University

Email: a.samsonova@spbu.ru
St. Petersburg, Russia

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Z. N. Lye, M. D. Purugganan, Trends Plant Sci., 24, 352 (2019).
  2. Y. Yuan, P. E. Bayer, J. Batley, and D. Edwards, Plant Biotechnol. J., 19, 2153 (2021).
  3. S. Nik-Zainal, Genome Med., 11, 1 (2019).
  4. A. Janssen, S. U. Colmenares, and G. H. Karpen, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 34, 265 (2018).
  5. S. S. Ho, A. E. Urban, and R. E. Mills, Nat. Rev. Genet., 1 (2019).
  6. E. M. Kass, M. E. Moynahan, and M. Jasin, MOL-CEL, 62, 777 (2016).
  7. N. Andor, C. C. Maley, and H. P. Ji, Cancer Res., 77, 2179 (2017).
  8. A. Dolatabadian, D. A. Patel, D. Edwards, and J. Batley, Theor. Appl. Genet., 130, 2479 (2017).
  9. A. Abyzov, A. E. Urban, M. Snyder, and M. Gerstein, Genome Res., 21, 974 (2011).
  10. V. Boeva, et al., Bioinformatics, 28, 423 (2011).
  11. A. Samsonova, et al., Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22, 2665 (2021).
  12. D. Arends, et al., Bioinformatics, 28, 1042 (2012).
  13. B. Ng, et al., Nat. Neurosci., 20, 1 (2017).
  14. Y. Ma, H. Klein, and P. L. D. Jager, Brain Pathol., 30, 984 (2020).
  15. М. А. Дук, А. А. Канапин, А. А. Самсонова и др., Биофизика, 67, 234 (2022).
  16. H. Li and R. Durbin, Bioinformatics, 26, 589 (2010).
  17. D. Tello, et al., Bioinformatics, 35, 4716 (2019).
  18. O. Stegle, L. Parts, M. Piipari, et al., Nat. Protoc., 7, 500 (2012).
  19. H. Ongen, et al., Nat.Commun., 8, 1 (2017).
  20. H. Fang, B. Knezevic, K. L. Burnham, and J. C. Knight, Genome Med., 8, 1 (2016).
  21. J. Mistry, et al., Nucl. Acids Res., 49, gkaa913 (2020).
  22. J.-M. Zhou and Y. Zhang, Cell, 181, 978 (2020).
  23. D. Lapin, O. Johanndrees, Z. Wu, et al., Plant Cell, 34, 1479 (2022).
  24. S. J. Riedl, W. Li, Y. Chao, et al., Nature, 434, 926 (2005).
  25. N. Boes, K. Schreiber, E. Hartig, et al., J. Bacteriol., 188, 6529 (2006).
  26. D. D. Leipe, Y. I. Wolf, E. V. Koonin, and L. Aravind, J. Mol. Biol., 317, 41 (2002).

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023

Осы сайт cookie-файлдарды пайдаланады

Біздің сайтты пайдалануды жалғастыра отырып, сіз сайттың дұрыс жұмыс істеуін қамтамасыз ететін cookie файлдарын өңдеуге келісім бересіз.< / br>< / br>cookie файлдары туралы< / a>