Alanine: from the usual to the unexpected

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Data from the experiments provides a possibility to talk about anomalously large contribution of alanine to the stability of an alpha-helix and other protein conformations. Independent data (and also experimental ones) suggest that alanine plays an especially big role in stabilization of the alpha-helix. This can be seen through the positive contribution of alanine both to the entropy of the system and to the enthalpy. The high contribution of alanine to the enthalpy of formation of the alpha helix contradicts the generally accepted view that the entropy should decrease during the formation of regular structures in proteins. Among three types of helices in proteins, alanine stabilizes two secondary structures: the alpha helix and the left helix of polyproline II, and in the case of fibrillar proteins, alanine also stabilizes the beta sheet. The stabilizing effect of alanine on the alpha helix structure extends to both natively unfolded proteins and alpha helix-support conjugates. Thus, it is no exaggeration to say that formation of secondary structure relies on alanine. The revealed contradictions are of paradoxical nature and yet there is no interpretation of the above-mentioned findings (first of all, substantiation of the contribution of alanine to the enthalpy of fusion in terms of fundamental physics) so far to resolve them. Meanwhile, the data and comments presented in this work hold out the promise of progress in resolving the revealed contradictions.

About the authors

V. G Tumanyan

Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: vgt450@yandex.ru
Moscow, Russia

A. A Anashkina

Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Moscow, Russia

I. V Filatov

Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology

Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia

K. V Smirnov

Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Moscow, Russia

I. Yu Torshin

Dorodnicyn Computing Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences

Moscow, Russia

N. G Esipova

Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Moscow, Russia

References

  1. J. Wang, E. C. Salihi, and L. Siller, Mater. Sci. Engineer., 72 (2), 1 (2017).
  2. V. E. Gray, R. J. Hause, and D. M. Fowler, Genetics, 207, 53 (2017).
  3. J. Yang, E. J. Spek, Y. Gong, et al., Prot. Sci., 6, 1264 (1997).
  4. Y. Wu, M. Lu, M. Chen, et al., Prot. Sci., 16, 1449 (2007).
  5. J. D. Nickels, J. E. Curtis, H. O'Neill, and A. P. Sokolov, J. Biol. Phys. 38, 497 (2012).
  6. M. Dracinsky, J. Kaminsky, and P. Bour, J. Phys. Chem. B, 113, 14698 (2009).
  7. S. Toal and R. Schweitzer-Stenner, Biomolecules, 4, 725 (2014).
  8. C. A. Rohl, W. Fiori, and R. L. Baldwin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 3682 (1999).
  9. Y. Xue, M. S. Pavlova, Y. E. Ryabov, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 129, 6827 (2007).
  10. J. M. Richardson, M. M. Lopez, and G. I. Makhatadze, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102 (5), 1413 (2005).
  11. L. Serrano, J. L. Neira, J. Sancho, and A. R. Fersht, Nature, 356 (6368), 453 (1992).
  12. S. Penel and A. J. Doig, J. Mol. Biol., 305 (4), 961 (2001).

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies