Antioxidant Effect of Caffeic Acid Derivatives on Sod and Glutathione Defective Yeasts
- Authors: Prudêncio E.R.1, Cardoso C.M.2, Castro R.N.3, Riger C.J.1
-
Affiliations:
- Laboratory of Oxidative Stress in Microorganisms, Department of Biochemistry. Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro
- Biochemistry Laboratory, Institute of Zootechnics. Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro
- Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry and Honey Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro
- Issue: Vol 55, No 3 (2019)
- Pages: 264-269
- Section: Article
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0003-6838/article/view/152875
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683819030116
- ID: 152875
Cite item
Abstract
Hydroxycinnamic acids have received particular attention because they are the most abundant phenolic class in our diet and because of the increasing interest in reducing oxidative damages. These damages are related to diseases such as cancer and atherosclerosis, as well as neurodegenerative disorders. The objective of this study was to evaluate the antioxidant protection of chlorogenic and caffeic acids and caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) against oxidative stress in vivo. Antioxidant activity was evaluated using BY4741 strain and superoxide dismutase- and glutathione-deficient (Δsod1 and Δgsh1) mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae through cell viability assays, lipid peroxidation levels and glutathione quantification. In the cell viability tests, caffeic acid promoted higher stress tolerance, with a 106% increase in S. cerevisiae BY4741. However, in the Δsod1 mutant, the effect of chlorogenic acid was more prominent, showing a 3.3-fold increase and in the Δgsh1 mutant all treatments provided a similar level of protection. The phenolic acids protected cell membranes in control and mutant cells at the same level. CAPE maintained the GSH concentration at levels similar to the non-stressed control (48.6 ± 10.9 nmol/mg of cells). The maintenance of cytoplasmic levels of GSH that was promoted by CAPE, despite the induction of stress, indicates its superior antioxidant protection to its precursor, caffeic acid.
About the authors
E. R. Prudêncio
Laboratory of Oxidative Stress in Microorganisms, Department of Biochemistry. Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro
Author for correspondence.
Email: edleneribeiro@gmail.com
Brazil, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro CEP: 23897-000
C. M. Cardoso
Biochemistry Laboratory, Institute of Zootechnics. Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro
Email: edleneribeiro@gmail.com
Brazil, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, CEP: 23897-000
R. N. Castro
Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry and Honey Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro
Email: edleneribeiro@gmail.com
Brazil, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, CEP: 23897-000
C. J. Riger
Laboratory of Oxidative Stress in Microorganisms, Department of Biochemistry. Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro
Email: edleneribeiro@gmail.com
Brazil, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro CEP: 23897-000
Supplementary files
