Basic principles for organizing secondary fracture prevention in patients hospitalized with proximal femoral fracture
- Authors: Belov M.V.1, Belova K.Y.1, Lesnyak O.M.2, Dzhalatova V.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Yaroslavl State Medical University
- North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
- Issue: Vol 17, No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 5-15
- Section: Reviews
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/vszgmu/article/view/353793
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/mechnikov678359
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PHTAKO
- ID: 353793
Cite item
Abstract
To reduce the incidence of osteoporotic fractures, Fracture Liaison Services are being established worldwide, which have demonstrated high clinical and cost-effectiveness. However, in patients hospitalized with a fracture of the proximal femur, the implementation of this system presents a number of specific features and difficulties. This is due to the severity of the condition and multimorbidity of the patients, as well as difficulties in accessing medical services due to reduced mobility and dependence on external assistance. The most effective approach to organizing secondary fracture prevention in these patients is the implementation of measures for the diagnosis and initiation of osteoporosis therapy within the framework of orthogeriatric care already at the inpatient treatment stage. Furthermore, it is necessary to establish a system for transferring patient information to primary care physicians and engaging them in the active management of these patients. The article also discusses controversial issues regarding the need for bone densitometry, prevention of hypocalcemia, correction of possible vitamin D deficiency, active identification of vertebral fractures, as well as ensuring active monitoring and education of patients who have sustained a proximal femoral fracture. The opinion is expressed on the necessity of developing unified standards for the organization of secondary fracture prevention services and establishing quality criteria for evaluating their performance at the national level.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Mikhail V. Belov
Yaroslavl State Medical University
Email: micbelov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7955-3625
SPIN-code: 9920-8319
Kseniia Yu. Belova
Yaroslavl State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: ksbelova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7856-1567
SPIN-code: 4372-8670
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, YaroslavlOlga M. Lesnyak
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Email: olga.m.lesnyak@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0143-0614
SPIN-code: 6432-4188
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgValentina S. Dzhalatova
Yaroslavl State Medical University
Email: valentinadj@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-3647-3842
SPIN-code: 6155-1458
MD
Russian Federation, YaroslavlReferences
- Lesnyak O, Ershova O, Belova K, et al. Epidemiology of fracture in the Russian Federation and the development of a FRAX model. Arch Osteoporos. 2012;7(1–2):67–73. doi: 10.1007/s11657-012-0082-3 EDN: SPYIBD
- Kanis JA, Oden A, Mccloskey EV, et al. A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(9):2239–2256. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-1964-3 EDN: RKFGMJ
- Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, et al. A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone. 2004;35(2):375–382. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.024 EDN: MDSZZL
- Harrington JT. Dilemmas in providing osteoporosis care for fragility fracture patients. US Musculoskeletal Review-Touch Briefings. 2006;2:64–65. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313102503_Dilemmas_in_providing_osteoporosis_care_for_fragility_fracture_patients. Accessed: 30 May 2021.
- Belova KYu, Evstigneeva LP, Lesnyak OM, et al. Organization of a secondary fracture prevention system. Expert group recommendations. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2024;27(8):26–31. doi: 10.17116/profmed20242708126 EDN: PCMEEB
- Wu CH, Tu ST, Chang YF, et al. Fracture liaison services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Bone. 2018;111:92–100. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.03.018
- Solomon DH, Patrick AR, Schousboe J, Losina E. The potential economic benefits of improved postfracture care: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a fracture liaison service in the US health-care system. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(7):1667–1674. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2180 EDN: WDVCIX
- Chernyscheva IS, Molova EA. Managment of osteoporotic fractures in real clinical practice. 2023;12(2(43)):128–130. doi: 10.33029/2304-9529-2023-12-2-128-130 EDN: YHINQW
- Sale JEM, Beaton D, Posen J, et al. Systematic review on interventions to improve osteoporosis investigation and treatment in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(7):2067–2082. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1544-y EDN: KPRWO
- Marsh D, Akesson К, Beaton DE, et al. Coordinator-based systems for secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(7):2051–2065. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1642-x EDN: MUVSAN
- Ganda K, Puech M, Chen JS, et al. Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(2):393–406. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2090-y EDN: BLWQJC
- Åkesson KE, Ganda K, Deignan C, et al. Post-fracture care programs for prevention of subsequent fragility fractures: a literature assessment of current trends. Osteoporos Int. 2022;33(8):1659–1676. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06358-2 EDN: OSNWYU
- Mitchell P, Akesson K, Chandran M, et al. Implementation of models of care for secondary osteoporotic fracture prevention and orthogeriatric. models of care for osteoporotic hip fracture. best practice and research. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;30(3):536–558. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2016.09.008 EDN: YVWCZZ
- Lesnyak OM, Kochish AYu, Belenkiy IG, et al. Interdisciplinary consensus on the care of elderly patients with hip fractures through an orthogeriatric approach. Bull Rehabil Med. 2025;24(2):120–139. doi: 10.38025/2078-1962-2025-24-2-120-139
- Ingstad F, Solberg LB, Nordsletten L, et al. Vitamin D status and complications, readmissions, and mortality after hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2021;32(5):873–881. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05739-9 EDN: FJFWVA
- Di Monaco M, Castiglioni C, Di Carlo S, et al. Classes of vitamin D status and functional outcome after hip fracture: a prospective, short-term study of 1350 inpatients. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019;55(1):56–62. doi: 10.23736/s1973-9087.18.05191-2
- Lyles KW, Colón-Emeric CS, Magaziner JS, et al. Zoledronic acid and clinical fractures and mortality after hip fracture. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1799–1809. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa074941
- Wang CY, Fu SH, Yang RS, et al. Timing of anti-osteoporosis medications initiation after a hip fracture affects the risk of subsequent fracture: a nationwide cohort study. Bone. 2020;138:115452. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115452 EDN: PBKJHO
- Li YT, Cai HF, Zhang ZL. Timing of the initiation of bisphosphonates after surgery for fracture healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26(2):431–441. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2903-2
- Chandran M, Akesson KE, Javaid MK, et al. Impact of osteoporosis and osteoporosis medications on fracture healing: a narrative review. Osteoporos Int. 2024;35(8):1337–1358. doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07059-8
- Tong YYF, Holmes S, Sefton A. Early bisphosphonate therapy post proximal femoral fracture fixation does not impact fracture healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2022;92(11):2840–2848. doi: 10.1111/ans.17792 EDN: WENNPU
- Johansen A, Sahota O, Dockery F, et al. Call to action: a five nations consensus on the use of intravenous zoledronate after hip fracture. Age Ageing. 2023;52(9):afad172. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad172 EDN: CBBPYJ
- Gleich J, Fleischhacker E, Rascher K, et al. Increased geriatric treatment frequency improves mobility and secondary fracture prevention in older adult hip fracture patients-an observational cohort study of 23,828 patients from the registry for geriatric trauma (ATR-DGU). J Clin Med. 2021;10(23):5489. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235489 EDN: FFGXJX
- Yamamoto N, Sawaguchi T, Matsushita T, et al. Fragility fracture network-Japan: the challenge of establishment of a national hip fracture database and successful achievement of nationwide health system change for hip fracture care in Japan. Injury. 2024;55(6):111452. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111452 EDN: PCIHRO
- Kuiper BW, Graybill S, Tate JM, et al. After the fall: improving osteoporosis treatment following hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29(6):1295–1301. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4416-x EDN: AQDASB
- Belova KYu, Ershova OB. Organization of medical care for patients with severe osteoporosis. Krasnoyarsk: Science and Innovation Center Publishing House; 2016. 162 p. (In Russ.) EDN: WWEFFL
- Bennett MJ, Center JR, Perry L. Exploring barriers and opportunities to improve osteoporosis care across the acute-to-primary care interface: a qualitative study. Osteoporos Int. 2023;34(7):1249–1262. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06748-0
- Belova K, Gordzheladze K, Belov M. Prevalence of geriatric syndromes in patients 60 years and older with hip fracture. In: World congress on osteoporosis, osteoarthritis and musculoskeletal deseases; Berlin 24–27 March 2022. Abstract book. Berlin: WCO-IOF-ESCEO; 2022. P. 443. EDN: CKFHPY
- Belaya ZhE, Bilezikian JP, Ershova OB, et al. Long-term treatment options for postmenopausal osteoporosis: results of recent clinical studies of Denosumab. Osteoporosis Bone Dis. 2018;21(1):17–22. doi: 10.14341/osteo9760
- Belaya ZhE, Belova KYu, Biryukova EV, et al. Federal clinical guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Bone Dis. 2021;24(2):4–47. doi: 10.14341/osteo129301 EDN: TUONYE
- Yu SJ, Yang Y, Zang JC, et al. Evaluation of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and bone mineral density in 268 patients with hip fractures. Orthop Surg. 2021;13(3):892–899. doi: 10.1111/os.12920
- Belova KYu, Bublik EV, Gladkova EN, et al. First results of the register of patients with osteoporosis included in the secondary fracture prevention services. Russian Journal of Geriatric Medicine. 2021;(2):211–218. doi: 10.37586/2686-8636-2-2021-201-208 EDN: TEXBUT
- Aboudiab M, Grados F, Batteux B, et al. Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) in patients over 50 years of age with a non-severe peripheral fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2020;31(8):1477–1486. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05400-5
- Schousboe JT, Lix LM, Morin SN, et al. Vertebral fracture assessment increases use of pharmacologic therapy for fracture prevention in clinical practice. J Bone Miner Res. 2019;34(12):2205–2212. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3836
- Tkacheva ON, Kotovskaya YuV, Rozanov AV, et al. Methodological recommendation. A complex of measures aimed at preventing falls and fractures in elderly and senile people. Moscow; 2021. 48 p. Available from: https://static-0.minzdrav.gov.ru/system/attachments/attaches/000/061/360/original/Комплекс_мер_падения_2021.pdf?1675861651 Accessed: Sept 14, 2025. (In Russ.)
- Bennett MJ, Center JR, Perry L. Establishing consensus recommendations for long-term osteoporosis care for patients who have attended an Australian fracture liaison service: a Delphi study. Osteoporos Int. 2024;35(3):373–389. doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07014-7 EDN: YPCFBK
- Hiligsmann M, McGowan B, Bennett K, et al. The clinical and economic burden of poor adherence and persistence with osteoporosis medications in Ireland. Value Health. 2012;15(5):604–612. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.001
- Yeam CT, Chia S, Tan HCC, et al. A systematic review of factors affecting medication adherence among patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29(12):2623–2637. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4759-3 EDN: SMHFQQ
- Hawley S, Javaid MK, Prieto-Alhambra D, et al. Clinical effectiveness of orthogeriatric and fracture liaison service models of care for hip fracture patients: population-based longitudinal study. Age Ageing. 2016;45(2):236–242. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv204 EDN: WDJGLN
- Commonwealth of Australia 2019. Department of Health. National Strategic Action Plan for Osteoprosis. Available from: https://healthybonesaustralia.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/oa-nap_final_24-09-19-1.pdf Accessed: Sept 14, 2025.
- French S, Choden S, Schmajuk G. Quality measures and quality improvement initiatives in osteoporosis–an update. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2019;17(6):491–509. doi: 10.1007/s11914-019-00547-5 EDN: UIGXWJ
- Javaid MK, Sami A, Lems W, et al. A patient-level key performance indicator set to measure the effectiveness of fracture liaison services and guide quality improvement: a position paper of the IOF Capture the Fracture Working Group, National Osteoporosis Foundation and Fragility Fracture Network. Osteoporos Int. 2020;31(7):1193–1204. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05377-1 EDN: CCJJRB
- Voeten SC, Arends AJ, Wouters MWJM, et al. The Dutch Hip Fracture Audit: evaluation of the quality of multidisciplinary hip fracture care in the Netherlands. Arch Osteoporos. 2019;14(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0576-3
- Belova KYu, Lesnyak OM, Evstigneeva LP, et al. Comments on the use of Key Performance Indicators in evaluating the Organization of Fracture Liaison Services. Osteoporosis Bone Dis. 2022;25(4):28–42. doi: 10.14341/osteo12960 EDN: REGPLP
Supplementary files


