Medical and social rehabilitation following testicular prosthesis in post-orchiectomy patients

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this study was to optimize indications and techniques and to develop the optimal timing for testicular prosthesis following inversion in adolescence considering the assessment of quality of life of patients at different times following the surgery.

Materials and methods. We observed 70 patients with gonadal loss following critical ischemia (torsion) at ages 11-18 years (average, 15.5 ± 2.3 years). In total, 49 patients underwent joint replacement after orchiectomy due to torsion. In 21 patients, prosthetics were preceded by orchiectomy for testicular atrophy as a result of twis ting. The interval from an acute episode to joint replacement ranged from 6 months to 15 years. Three techniques for testicular prosthesis implantation were applied: prosthetics with inguinal access without suturing the scrotal entrance (n = 14); prosthetics with inguinal access with suturing the scrotal entrance by the originally developed technique (n = 34); and a prosthetic scrotum (n = 22). Patient satisfaction was assessed based on the different outcomes of testicular inversion according to the originally developed questionnaire.

Results. Suturing the scrotal entrance reduces the risk of implant migration in the proximal direction due to anatomical prerequisites. Scrotal access does not have this drawback but increases the risk of inflammatory complications. The esthetic result of prosthetics depends on patient’s age during orchiectomy. Older patients tend to have better cosmetic results. The most favorable results of prosthetics are noted at the time that has passed since the turn – no more than 3 years; all unsatisfactory results are noted at the time of more than 5 years since the twist. Testicular prosthesis increases social adaptation of patients after gonadal loss and improves their quality of life.

Conclusions. 1. Testicular prosthesis is an essential stage of patient rehabilitation after an orchiectomy for inversion. 2. Prosthetic inguinal access by the originally developed technique is optimal from a technical perspective and provides the most physiological standing of the implant. 3. Prosthetics results directly depend on the period following the initial operation. 4. Testicular prosthesis complications can be minimized with the accumulation of knowledge and surgical experience and their rational prevention. 5. Assessment of patients’ quality of life illustrates the necessity of gonadal prosthetics for cosmetic compensation of organ loss and psycho-emotional and social rehabilitation

About the authors

Igor S. Shormanov

Yaroslavl State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: i-s-shormanov@yandex.ru

Doctor of Medical Science, Professor, Head of the Department of Urology and Nephrology

Russian Federation, Yaroslavl

Dmitriy N. Shchedrov

Yaroslavl Regional Pediatric Clinical Hospital

Email: shedrov.dmitry@yandex.ru

Candidate of Medical Science, Head of the Pediatric Urology of Andrology unit

Russian Federation, Yaroslavl

References

  1. Шилл В-Б, Комхайр Ф, Харгрив Е. Клиническая андрология. - М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2011. - 800 с. [Shill V-B, Komhair F, Hargriv E. Klinicheskaya andrologiya. Moscow: GEOTAR- Media; 2011. 800 p. (In Russ).]
  2. Marshal SMD. Potential problems with testicular prostheses. Urology. 1986;28(5):388-390. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(86)90068-3.
  3. Adshead J, Khoubehi B, Wood J, Rustin G. Testicular implants and patient satisfaction: a guestionnare-based study of men after orchidectomy for testicular cancer. BJU International. 2001;88:559-562. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.02392.x.
  4. Окулов А.Б. Хирургическая тактика при заболеваниях органов репродуктивной системы у детей: Дис. … д-ра мед. наук. - М., 2001. [Okulov AB. Khirurgicheskaya taktika pri zabolevaniyakh organov reproduktivnoi sistemy u detei. [dissertation] Moscow; 2001. (In Russ).]
  5. Knight PJ, Vassy LE. The diagnosis and treatment of the acute scrotum in children and abolescents. Ann Surg. 1984;200(5):664-673. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198411000-00019.
  6. Hajji F, Janane A. Torsion of Undescended Testis. N Engl J Med. 2012;336(17):1625. doi: 10.1056/nejmicm1111776.
  7. Rivers KK, Rivers E, Stricker HJ, et al. The clinical utility of serologic markers in the evaluation of the acute scrotum. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7(9):1069-1072. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02103.x.
  8. Комарова С.Ю., Цап Н.А., Чукреев В.И. Особенности консервативной и оперативной тактики при перекруте яичка. Детская хирургия. - 2016. - Т. 20. - № 4. - С. 185-188. [Komarova SYu, Tsap NA, Chukreev VI. Peculiarities of conservative and surgical treatment of testicular torsion. Children’s surgery. 2016;20(4):185-188. (In Russ).]. doi: 10.18821/1560-9510-2016-20-4-185-188.
  9. Мадыкин Ю.Ю., Золотухин О.В., Фирсов О.В. О некоторых особенностях протезирования яичек. Материалы 8-го конгресса «Мужское здоровье»; Апрель 26-28, 2012; Ереван. - С. 73-74. [Madykin JuJu, Zolotuhin OV, Firsov OV. O nekotoryh osobennostjah protezirovanija jaichek. (Conference proceedings) VIII Kongress “Muzhskoe zdorov’e”; 2012 Apr 26-28; Erevan. P. 73-74. (In Russ).]
  10. Патент РФ на изобретение № 2231300/ 07.08.2002. Макаров Г.А., Чепурной Г.И. Способ протезирования яичек при монорхизме и анорхизме. [Patent RUS No 2231300/ 07.08.2002. Makarov GA, Chepurnoj GI. Sposob protezirovanija jaichek pri monorhizme i anorhizme. (In Russ.)]. Доступно по: http://www.bankpatemtov.ru/node/93116.
  11. Turek PJ. Master V. and The Testicular Prosthesis Group. Safety and effectiveness of a new saline filled testicular prosthesis. J Urol. 2004;172(4):1427-1430. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000139718.09510.a4
  12. Lawrentschuk N, Webb DR. Inserting testicular prostheses: a new surgical technigue for difficult cases. BJU International. 2005;95(7):1111-1114. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2005.05476.x.
  13. Doherty AP, Mannion BM, Moss JJ, et al. Spread of silicone to inguinal lymph nodes from a leaking testicular prosthesis: a cause for chronic fatigue? BJU International. 2000;86(9):1090. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00961.x.
  14. Incrocci L, Bosch JL, Slob AK. Testicular prostheses: body image and sexual functioning. BJU Int. 1999;84(9):1043-1045. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00347.x.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Patient M., 16 years old. 7 months after prosthetic testis. Stenting of the implant in the middle parts of the scrotum. Orthectomy performed at the age of 15 years

Download (220KB)
3. Fig. 2. Patient Shch., 15 years old. 8 months after prosthetics. Stenting of the implant in the upper parts of the scrotum. Orhectomy performed at the age of 2 years

Download (235KB)
4. Fig. 3. The appearance of the scrotum before surgery (a) and after the operation (b)

Download (546KB)
5. Fig. 4. Implant rejection (16th day after endoprosthetics)

Download (337KB)
6. Fig. 5. Removal of the implant and suture of the scrotum defect

Download (315KB)
7. Fig. 6. Stem of the testicle initially and 6 months after the operation. There is a dislocation of the implant to the root of the scrotum with shrinkage of the scrotum

Download (458KB)

Copyright (c) 2018 Shormanov I.S., Shchedrov D.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies