Email this article Surgical treatment of Peyronie disease
- Authors: Kalinina S.N.1, Fesenko V.N.1, Nikolskii A.V.2, Burlaka O.O.2
-
Affiliations:
- North-Western State Medical university named after I.I. Mechnikov
- Aleksandrovskaya Hospital
- Issue: Vol 8, No 2 (2018)
- Pages: 24-29
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/uroved/article/view/9114
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/uroved8224-29
- ID: 9114
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
We present the results of operative treatment of 25 men with Peyronie disease. Indications for surgical treatment included plaques > 1.5 cm and a penile curvature angle > 45°. In total, 11 patients underwent plaque plication of the penis following the method of P.A. Shcheplev, 5 patients underwent substitutive corporoplasty of plaque using the large saphenous vein of the thigh, 5 patients underwent patchwork сorporoplasty using xenopericardium, and 4 patients underwent corporoplasty using buccal mucosa graft. The results of the operative treatment of all patients were considered positive. In conclusion, operative treatment of patients with Peyronie disease undergoing corporoplasty replacement is indicated for plaque stabilization, particularly while using xenopericardium.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Svetlana N. Kalinina
North-Western State Medical university named after I.I. Mechnikov
Author for correspondence.
Email: kalinina_sn@mail.ru
Doctor of Medical Science, Professor, Urology Department
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgVladimir N. Fesenko
North-Western State Medical university named after I.I. Mechnikov
Email: fesvn_spb@mail.ru
Candidate of Medical Science, Associate Professor, Urology Department
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgAnton V. Nikolskii
Aleksandrovskaya Hospital
Email: burlaka@list.ru
Candidate of Medical Science, Urologist, Department of Urology
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgOleg O. Burlaka
Aleksandrovskaya Hospital
Email: burlaka@list.ru
Candidate of Medical Science, Head of Department of Urology
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Урология. Российские клинические рекомендации / Под ред. Ю.Г. Аляева, П.В. Глыбочко, Д.Ю. Пушкаря. - М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2015. [Urologija. Rossijskie klinicheskie rekomendacii. Ed by Ju.G. Aljaeva, P.V. Glybochko, D.Ju. Pushkar. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2015. (In Russ.)]
- Калинина С.Н., Тиктинский О.Л., Новиков И.Ф. Фибропластическая индурация полового члена (болезнь Пейрони): Пособие для врачей-урологов. - СПб.: Изд-во СПбМАПО, 2009. [Kalinina SN, Tiktinskij OL, Novikov IF. Fibroplasticheskaja induracija polovogo chlena (bolezn’ Pejroni). Posobie dlja vrachej-urologov. Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo SPbMAPO; 2009. (In Russ.)]
- Тиктинский О.Л., Калинина С.Н., Михайличенко В.В. Андрология. - М.: МИА, 2010. [Tiktinskij OL, Kalinina SN, Mihajlichenko VV. Andrologija. Moscow: MIA; 2010. (In Russ.)]
- Москалева Ю.С., Остапченко А.Ю., Корнеев И.А. Болезнь Пейрони // Урологические ведомости. - 2015. - Т. 5. - № 4. - С. 30-35. [Moskaleva JuS, Ostapchenko AJu, Korneev IA. Peyronie’s disease. Urologicheskie vedomosti. 2015;5(4):30-35. (In Russ.)]
- Sommer F, Schwarzer U, Wassmer G, et al. Epidemiology of Peyronie’s disease. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2002;14(5):379-383. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900863.
- La Pera G, Pescatori ES, Calabrese M, et al. Peyronie’s disease: prevalence and association with cigarette smoking: a multicenter population-based study in men aged 50-69 years. European Urology. 2001;40(5):525-530. doi: 10.1159/000049830.
- Щеплев П.А., Данилов И.А., Колотинский А.Б., и др. Клинические рекомендации. Болезнь Пейрони // Андрология и генитальная хирургия. - 2007. - № 1. - С. 55-58. [Shheplev PA, Danilov IA, Kolotinskij AB, et al. Klinicheskie rekomendacii. Bolezn’ Pejroni. Andrologija i genital’naja hirurgija. 2007(1):55-58. (In Russ.)]
- Москалева Ю.С., Корнеев И.А. Результаты хирургического лечения при болезни Пейрони // Урологические ведомости. - 2017. - Т. 7. - № 1. - С. 25-29. [Moskaleva JuS, Korneev IA. Results of surgical treatment of Peyroni’s disease. Urologicheskie vedomosti. 2017;7(1)25-29. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.17816/uroved7125-29.
- Королева С.В., Ковалев В.А., Лещев Н.В., и др. Выбор метода корпоропластики при болезни Пейрони в зависимости от гемодинамического статуса полового члена // Урология. - 2005. - № 6. - С. 26-30. [Koroleva SV, Kovalev VA, Leshhev NV, et al. Vybor metoda korporoplastiki pri bolezni Pejroni v zavisimosti ot gemodinamicheskogo statusa polovogo chlena. Urologiia. 2005;(6):26-30. (In Russ.)]
- Калмин О.В., Никольский В.И., Федорова М.Г., и др. Морфологические изменения ксеноперикарда в условиях гнойно-воспалительного процесса // Известия высших учебных заведений. Поволжский регион. Медицинские науки. - 2011. - № 4. - С. 12-20. [Kalmin OV, Nikol’skij VI, Fedorova MG, et al. Morfologicheskie izmenenija ksenoperikarda v uslovijah gnojno-vospalitel’nogo processa. Izvestija vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Povolzhskij region. Medicinskie nauki. 2011;(4):12-20. (In Russ.)]
- Carson CC. Penile prosthesis implantation in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 1998;10(2):125-128. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900330.
- Mufti G, Aitchison M, Bramwell SP, et al. Corporeal plication for surgical correction of Peyronie’ s disease. J Urol. 1990;144(2): 281-282. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39432-6.
Supplementary files
