Prognostic value of immunological components of tumor microenvironment of oncourological tumors

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, the tumor microenvironment has been considered as one of the key factors determining the prognosis and nature of the necessary therapeutic interventions. Currently, there is only one validated and approved predictive model that includes microenvironment components. Several classifications of the tumor microenvironment based on the nature of the predominant cellular subpopulations have been proposed.

AIM: The aim of the study was to assess the prognostic significance of the immunological components of blood and the microenvironment, as well as to create prognostic models for oncourological tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study used clinical data from 115 patients with kidney, bladder and prostate cancer. Immunological parameters in the tumor and blood microenvironment were evaluated in all patients. The end point of observation was the median time to progression. The influence of various parameters on long-term treatment outcomes was evaluated using the log rank and the Gehan–Wilcoxon criteria. A model of proportional hazard was used to identify the combined effect of several parameters on lifetime indicators.

RESULTS: The developed prognostic models for all studied groups include spontaneous production of three cytokines: IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10. The prognostic models for renal cell carcinoma and prostate cancer also included immunosuppressive components: MDSC and Treg. The median time to progression in patients with invasive urothelial cancer is influenced by components that contribute to tumor destruction: TNK cells and IFN-γ. In all the studied groups of patients (renal cell carcinoma, muscle-invasive urothelial cancer, prostate cancer), the median time to progression significantly differs in subgroups with different numbers of immunological risk factors for tumor microenvironment.

CONCLUSIONS: The developed prognostic models are based on modern achievements of oncoimmunology and after conducting multicenter validation studies, they can be recommended for clinical use.

About the authors

Oleg E. Molchanov

A.M. Granov Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies

Author for correspondence.
Email: molchanovo@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3882-1720
SPIN-code: 5557-6484
Scopus Author ID: 25637650600

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Dmitrii N. Maistrenko

A.M. Granov Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies

Email: may64@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8174-7461
SPIN-code: 7363-4840
Scopus Author ID: 57193120885

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Dmitrii A. Granov

A.M. Granov Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies

Email: d.granov@gmail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8746-8452
SPIN-code: 5256-2744

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Mikhail I. Shkolnik

A.M. Granov Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies

Email: shkolnik_phd@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0589-7999
SPIN-code: 4743-9236

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Igor Yu. Lisitsyn

A.M. Granov Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies

Email: urologlis@mail.ru

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Andrei D. Belov

A.M. Granov Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies

Email: doktorbeloff@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9652-4313
SPIN-code: 2637-0704

Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Aleksei Yu. Kneev

A.M. Granov Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies

Email: alexmedspb@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5899-8905
SPIN-code: 8015-1529

Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Yang L, Lin PS. Mechanisms that drive inflammatory tumor microenvironment, tumor heterogeneity, and metastatic progression. Semin Cancer Biol. 2017;47:185–195. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.08.001
  2. Buoncervello M, Gabriele L, Toschi E. The Janus face of tumor microenvironment targeted by immunotherapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(17):4320. doi: 10.3390/ijms20174320
  3. Jarosz-Biej M, Smolarczyk R, Cihon T, Kulach N. Tumor microenvironment as a “Game Changer” in cancer radiotherapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(13):3212. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133212
  4. Hanahan D, Coussens LM. Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2012;21(3):309–322. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.022
  5. Dunn GP, Old LJ, Schreiber RD. The three Es of cancer immunoediting. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22(1):329–360. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104803
  6. Liu S, Sun Q, Ren X. Novel strategies for cancer immunotherapy: counter-immunoediting therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2023;16(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13045-023-01430-8
  7. Talukdar S, Bhoopathi P, Emdad L, et al. Dormancy and cancer stem cells: an enigma for cancer therapeutic targeting. Adv Cancer Res. 2019;141:43–84. doi: 10.1016/bs.acr.2018.12.002
  8. Zeng Z, Fu M, Hu Y, et al. Regulation and signaling pathways in cancer stem cells: implication for targeted therapy for cancer. Mol Cancer. 2023;22(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12943-023-01877-w
  9. Locati M, Curtale G, Mantovani A. Diversity, Mechanisms and significance of macrophage plasticity. Annu Rev Pathol. 2020;15: 123–147. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012418-012718
  10. Zhao L, Dong Y, Zhang Y, et al. Biophysical heterogeneity of myeloid-derived microenvironement to regulate resistance to cancer immunotherapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;191:114585. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114585
  11. Ohue Y, Nishikava H. Regulatory T (Treg) cells in cancer: can Treg cells be a new therapeutic target? Cancer Sci. 2019;110(7): 2080–2089. doi: 10.1111/cas.14069
  12. Wculek SK, Cueto FJ, Mujal AM, et al. Dendritic cells in cancer immunology and immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;20(1): 7–24. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0210-z
  13. Wu Z, Zheng Y, Han Y, et al. CD3+CD4+CD8-(double-negative) T cells in inflammation, immune disorders and cancer. Front Immunol. 2022;13:816005. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.816005
  14. Bruchard M, Ghiringhelli F. Deciphering the roles of innate lymphoid cells in cancer. Front Immunol. 2019;10:656. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00656
  15. Chiossone L, Dumas PY, Vienne M, Vivier E. Natural killer cells and other innate lymphoid cells in cancer. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18(11):671–688. doi: 10.1038/s41577-018-0061-z
  16. Ostroumov D, Fekete-Drimusz N, Saborowski M, et al. CD4 and CD8 T lymphocyte interplay in controlling tumor growth. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75(4):689–713. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2686-7
  17. Molchanov O, Maistrenko D, Granov D, et al. Features of the microenvironment of oncourological tumors. Urology reports (St. Petersburg). 2022;12(4):313–331. doi: 10.17816/uroved112576
  18. Pages F, Mlecnik B, Marliot F, et al. International validation of the consensus immunoscore for the classification of colon cancer: a prognostic and accuracy study. Lancet. 2018;391(1035):2128–2139. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30789-X
  19. Galon J, Bruni D. Approaches to treat immune hot, altered and cold tumors with combination immunotherapies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(3):197–218. doi: 10.1038/s41573-018-0007-y
  20. Klatte T, Rossi SH, Stewart GD. Prognostic factors and prognostic models for renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol. 2018;36(12): 1943–1952. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2309-4
  21. Molchanov O, Maistrenko D, Granov D, Lisitsyn I. Prognostic value of tumor growth rate and biomarker dynamics in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Urology Reports (St. Petersburg). 2020;10(4): 281–291. doi: 10.17816/uroved50899
  22. Heng D, Xie W, Regan M, et al. Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(34):5794–5799. doi: 10.1200/jco.2008.21.4809
  23. Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
  24. Khaydukov S, Baidun L, Zurochka A, Totolyan A. Standardized technology “Study of subpopulation composition of peripheral blood lymphocytes using flow cytofluorimeters-analyzers”. Medical Immunology (Russia). 2012;14(3):255–268. (In Russ.) doi: 10.15789/1563-0625-2012-3-255-268
  25. Anker J, Miller J, Taylor N, et al. From bench to bedside: how the tumor microenvironement is impacting the future of immunotherapy for renal cell carcinoma. Cells. 2021;10(11):3231. doi: 10.3390/cells10113231
  26. Amsberg G, Alsdorf W, Karagiannis P, et al. Immunotherapy in advanced prostate cancer — light at the end of the tunnel? Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(5):2569. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052569
  27. Crispen P, Kusmartsev S. Mechanisms of immune evasion in bladder cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2020;69(1):3–14. doi: 10.1007/s00262-019-02443-4

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies