Patient management tactics with primary detected prostate-specific antigen increase
- Authors: Los M.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Regional Clinical Hospital
- Issue: Vol 9, No 4 (2019)
- Pages: 41-46
- Section: Original articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/uroved/article/view/19233
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/uroved9441-46
- ID: 19233
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The main screening test for prostate cancer is the determination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the blood. Increasing of the PSA level above 4 ng/ml is an indication for a detailed clinical examination of the patient. At the same time only in a quarter of cases with a PSA level of 4 to 10 ng/ml prostate cancer is diagnosed, and in 70–80% of cases prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis are diagnosed.
Objective: to determine the need for anti-inflammatory treatment in the initial detection of elevated PSA blood levels within the “gray area” in men over 50 years of age to minimize the number of puncture biopsies of the prostate.
Materials and methods. The study was divided into 2 parts. Part 1 – a retrospective study, in which results of the histological examinations of the prostate gland of 297 men after a puncture biopsy about an increase in the PSA level of more than 4 ng/ml were analyzed. Part 2 – a prospective study in which 118 men over 50 years of age with a primary increase in the PSA level from 4 to 9 ng/ml received anti-inflammatory treatment to monitor the dynamics of the PSA level.
Results: the appointment of anti-inflammatory treatment allows in 69% cases to avoid puncture biopsy of the prostate, increase the predictive value of PSA, reduce the frequency of post-puncture complications of inflammatory genesis.
Conclusion: the appointment of anti-inflammatory treatment is advisable when the primary increase in blood PSA levels to 9 ng/ml.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Marina S. Los
Regional Clinical Hospital
Author for correspondence.
Email: 922099@mail.ru
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Urologist
Russian Federation, YaroslavlReferences
- Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210.
- Аль-Шукри С.Х., Боровец С.Ю. Рак предстательной железы: некоторые аспекты эпидемиологии, этиологии и канцерогенеза // Урологические ведомости. – 2012. – Т. 2. – № 1. – С. 23–25. [Al-Shukri SKh, Borovets SYu. Prostate cancer: some aspects of epidemiology, etiology and carcinogenesis for prostate cancer. Urologicheskie vedomosti. 2012;2(1):23-25. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17816/uroved2123-25.
- Leyten GH, Hessels D, Jannink SA, et al. Prospective multicentre evaluation of PCA3 and TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions as diagnostic and prognostic urinary biomarkers for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014;65(3):534-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.014.
- Boegemann M, Stephan C, Cammann H, et al. The percentage of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform [-2]proPSA and the Prostate Health Index improve the diagnostic accuracy for clinically relevant prostate cancer at initial and repeat biopsy compared with total PSA and percentage free PSA in men aged ≤65 years. BJU Int. 2016;117(1):72-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13139.
- Понкратов С.В., Хейфец В.Х., Каган О.Ф. Диагностическая ценность простатспецифического антигена с учетом возраста пациентов // Урологические ведомости. – 2016. – Т. 6. – № 3. – С. 30–39. [Ponkratov SV, Kheyfets VKh, Kagan OF. Diagnostic value of prostate-specific antigen according to age patients. Urologicheskie vedomosti. 2016;6(3):30-39. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17816/uroved6330-39.
- Mottet N, van den Bergh RC, Briers E, et al. Prostate cancer [Internet]. Eur Associat Urol; 2019. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer/.
- Ильяш А.В., Глухов В.П., Авадиева Н.Э., и др. Роль комбинированной фитотерапии в профилактике инфекций мочевых путей при биопсии предстательной железы // Вестник урологии. – 2017. – Т. 5. – № 1. – С. 37–41. [Il’yash AV, Glukhov VP, Avadieva NE, et al. The role of combined herbal therapy in the prevention of urinary tract infections during prostate biopsy. Herald Urology. 2017;5(1):37-41. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2017-5-1-37-41.
- Горбунова Е.Н., Давыдова Д.А., Крупин В.Н., Артифексова А.А. Динамика патологических процессов у пациентов с заболеваниями предстательной железы, тактика ведения // Клиническая медицина. – 2011. – № 3. – С. 88–93. [Gorbunova EN, Davydova DА, Krupin VN, Artifexova АА. The dynamics of pathological processes in patients with prostatic diseases, case management. Clinical Medicine. 2011;(3):88-93. (In Russ.)]
- Torkko KC, Wilson RS, Smith EE, et al. Prostate biopsy markers of inflammation are associated with risk of clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia: findings from the MTOPS study. J Urol. 2015;194(2):454-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.103.
- Попков В.М., Маслякова Г.Н., Ломакин Д.В. Морфологические особенности доброкачественной гиперплазии простаты у пациентов с повышенным уровнем ПСА // Бюллетень медицинских интернет-конференций. – 2015. – Т. 5. – № 7. – С. 1076. [Popkov VМ, Maslyakova GN, Lomakin DV. Morphological features of benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with elevated PSA levels. Bulletin of Medical Internet Conferences. 2015;5(7):1076. (In Russ.)]
- Loeb S, Gashti SN, Catalona WJ. Exclusion of inflammation in the differential diagnosis of an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Urol Oncol. 2009;27(1):64-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.urolonc.2008.04.002.
- Дорофеев С.Д., Кудрявцева Л.В., Хромов Р.А. Новые принципы профилактики обострений хронического абактериального простатита // Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. – 2013. – № 4. – С. 66–70. [Dorofeev SD, Kudryavceva LV, Khromov RA. New principles of prophylaxis of chronic non-bacterial prostatitis recurrences. Experimental and clinical urology. 2013;(4):66-70. (In Russ.)]
- Аль-Шукри C.Х., Боровец С.Ю., Курнаков А.М. Роль допплерографии и кинетических характеристик простатоспецифического антигена в дифференциальной диагностике хронического простатита и рака предстательной железы // Нефрология. – 2014. – Т. 18. – № 6. – С. 71–75. [Al-Shukri SKh, Borovets SYu, Kurnakov AM. Role of dopplerresearch and kinetic characteristics of PSA in differential diagnosis of chronic prostatitis and prostate cancer. Nephrology (Saint Petersburg). 2014;18(6):71-75. (In Russ.)]
- Аль-Шукри С.Х., Боровец С.Ю., Рыбалов М.А. Ошибки диагностики и стадирования рака предстательной железы // Урологические ведомости. – 2013. – Т. 3. – № 1. – С. 23–27. [Al-Shukri SKh, Borovets SYu, Rybalov MA. Errors of diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer. Urologicheskie vedomosti. 2013;3(1):23-27. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17816/uroved3123-27.
- Ткачук В.Н., Ткачук И.Н., Боровец С.Ю. Результаты 12-летнего исследования эффективности витапроста у больных хроническим простатитом // Урологические ведомости. – 2016. – Т. 6. – № 4. – С. 5–9. [Tkachuk VN, Tkachuk IN, Borovets SYu. The results of 12-year study of the efficacy of Vitaprost in patients with chronic prostatitis. Urologicheskie vedomosti. 2016;6(4):5-9. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17816/uroved645-9.
- Учваткин Г.В., Татаринцева М.Б. Простатические пептиды в лечении заболеваний предстательной железы // Урологические ведомости. – 2017. – Т. 7. – № 3. – С. 44–48. [Uchvatkin GV, Tatarinceva MB. The use of prostatic peptides in the treatment of prostate diseases. Urologicheskie vedomosti. 2017;7(3):44-48. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17816/uroved7344-48.
- Кузьмин И.В. Витапрост форте в лечении больных доброкачественной гиперплазией предстательной железы: патогенетические основы и клинические результаты // Урология. – 2019. – № 4. – С. 141–147. [Kuzmin IV. Vitaprost forte in the treament of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: pathogenetic basics and clinical results. Urologiia. 2019;(4):141-147. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.18565/urology.2019.4.141-147.
Supplementary files
