In vivo application of prevascularized bone scaffolds: A literature review
- 作者: Novosad Y.A.1, Pershina P.А.1, Shabunin A.S.1, Asadulaev M.S.1, Vlasova O.L.2, Vissarionov S.V.1
-
隶属关系:
- H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery
- Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
- 期: 卷 12, 编号 1 (2024)
- 页面: 77-87
- 栏目: Scientific reviews
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/turner/article/view/256975
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PTORS622772
- ID: 256975
如何引用文章
详细
BACKGROUND: Despite expanding research, the development of materials for replacing bone defects remains an urgent problem in orthopedics and traumatology. Thus, one of the most important tasks is to create conditions for proper trophicity of the bone implant.
AIM: To analyze modern approaches to bone scaffold vascularization and evaluate their adequacy in in vivo models.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The article presents a literature review dedicated to the methods of vascularization of bone scaffolds. A literature search was performed in PubMed, ScienceDirect, eLibrary, and Google Scholar databases from 2013 to 2023 using keywords, and 271 sources were identified. After exclusion, 95 articles were analyzed, and the results of 38 original studies and one literature review were presented.
RESULTS: Regardless of the initial vascularization method of scaffolds, bone implants show distinct osteoinductive features and promote advanced bone tissue regeneration. Constructs based on solid polymers and calcium–phosphate compositions also perform osteoconductive functions. Mesenchymal stem cells are used as the main cell type, as well as vessel-type cells, which in cooperation also have a positive effect on bone-defect remodeling. Bone morphogenetic proteins are used for directed differentiation in the osteogenic direction, and vascular endothelial growth factor is used for differentiation in the vascular pathway.
CONCLUSIONS: At present, no method for vascularization of scaffolds has been approved universally. In addition, no evidence supported the comparative effectiveness of vascularization methods, whereas animal model studies have demonstrated a positive effect of prevascularized patterns on the recovery rate of minor and critical defects.
作者简介
Yury Novosad
H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery
Email: yurynovosad@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6150-374X
SPIN 代码: 3001-1467
PhD student
俄罗斯联邦, 64-68 Parkovaya str., Pushkin, Saint Petersburg, 196603Polina Pershina
H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery
Email: polinaiva2772@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5665-3009
resident
俄罗斯联邦, 64-68 Parkovaya str., Pushkin, Saint Petersburg, 196603Anton Shabunin
H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery
Email: anton-shab@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8883-0580
SPIN 代码: 1260-5644
Research Associate
俄罗斯联邦, 64-68 Parkovaya str., Pushkin, Saint Petersburg, 196603Marat Asadulaev
H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery
Email: marat.asadulaev@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1768-2402
SPIN 代码: 3336-8996
MD, PhD student
俄罗斯联邦, 64-68 Parkovaya str., Pushkin, Saint Petersburg, 196603Olga Vlasova
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Email: vlasova.ol@spbstu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9590-703X
SPIN 代码: 7823-8519
PhD, Dr. Sc. (Phys. and Math.), Assistant Professor
俄罗斯联邦, Saint PetersburgSergei Vissarionov
H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: vissarionovs@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4235-5048
SPIN 代码: 7125-4930
MD, PhD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Corresponding Member of RAS
俄罗斯联邦, 64-68 Parkovaya str., Pushkin, Saint Petersburg, 196603参考
- Kneser U, Kaufmann PM, Fiegel HC, et al. Long-term differentiated function of heterotopically transplanted hepatocytes on three-dimensional polymer matrices. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;47(4):494–503. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(19991215)47:4<494::aid-jbm5>3.0.co;2-l
- Kushchayeva Y, Pestun I, Kushchayev S, et al. Advancement in the treatment of osteoporosis and the effects on bone healing. J Clin Med. 2022;11(24):7477. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247477
- You Q, Lu M, Li Z, et al. Cell sheet technology as an engineering-based approach to bone regeneration. Int J Nanomedicine. 2022;17:6491–6511. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S382115
- Zhang J, Huang Y, Wang Y, et al. Construction of biomimetic cell-sheet-engineered periosteum with a double cell sheet to repair calvarial defects of rats. J Orthop Translat. 2022;38:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.09.005
- Pirraco RP, Iwata T, Yoshida T, et al. Endothelial cells enhance the in vivo bone-forming ability of osteogenic cell sheets. Lab Invest. 2014;94(6):663–673. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2014.55
- Kawecki F, Galbraith T, Clafshenkel WP, et al. In vitro prevascularization of self-assembled human bone-like tissues and preclinical assessment using a rat calvarial bone defect model. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(8):2023. doi: 10.3390/ma14082023
- Ren L, Ma D, Liu B, et al. Preparation of three-dimensional vascularized MSC cell sheet constructs for tissue regeneration. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014. doi: 10.1155/2014/301279
- Guo T, Yuan X, Li X, et al. Bone regeneration of mouse critical-sized calvarial defects with human mesenchymal stem cell sheets co-expressing BMP2 and VEGF. J Dent Sci. 2023;18(1):135–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.06.020
- Lin Z, Zhang X, Fritch MR, et al. Engineering pre-vascularized bone-like tissue from human mesenchymal stem cells through simulating endochondral ossification. Biomaterials. 2022;283. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121451
- Zhang H, Zhou Y, Yu N, et al. Construction of vascularized tissue-engineered bone with polylysine-modified coral hydroxyapatite and a double cell-sheet complex to repair a large radius bone defect in rabbits. Acta Biomater. 2019;91:82–98. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.024
- Zhang D, Gao P, Li Q, et al. Engineering biomimetic periosteum with β-TCP scaffolds to promote bone formation in calvarial defects of rats. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13287-017-0592-4
- Zhu W, Qu X, Zhu J, et al. Direct 3D bioprinting of prevascularized tissue constructs with complex microarchitecture. Biomaterials. 2017;124:106–115. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.042
- Zhang W, Feng C, Yang G, et al. 3D-printed scaffolds with synergistic effect of hollow-pipe structure and bioactive ions for vascularized bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2017;135:85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.005
- Wang X, Yunru Y, Chaoyu Y, et al. Microfluidic 3D printing responsive scaffolds with biomimetic enrichment channels for bone regeneration. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(40). doi: 10.1002/adfm.202105190
- Xu J, Shen J, Sun Y, et al. In vivo prevascularization strategy enhances neovascularization of β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds in bone regeneration. J Orthop Translat. 2022;37:143–151. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.09.001
- Lin Y, Shen J, Sun Y, et al. In vivo prevascularization strategy enhances neovascularization of β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds in bone regeneration. J Orthop Translat. 2022;35(7):1031–1041. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.09.001 2019
- Mishra R, Roux BM, Posukonis M, et al. Effect of prevascularization on in vivo vascularization of poly(propylene fumarate)/fibrin scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2016;77:255–266. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.026
- Buckley C, Madhavarapu S, Kamara Z, et al. In vivo evaluation of the regenerative capacity of a nanofibrous, prevascularized, load-bearing scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Regen Eng Transl Med. 2023. doi: 10.1007/s40883-023-00303-3
- Nulty J, Freeman FE, Browe DC, et al. 3D bioprinting of prevascularised implants for the repair of critically-sized bone defects. Acta Biomater. 2021;126:154–169. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.003
- Hann SY, Cui H, Esworthy T, et al. Recent advances in 3D printing: vascular network for tissue and organ regeneration. Transl Res. 2019;211:46–63. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2019.04.002
- Li C, Han X, Ma Z, et al. Engineered customizable microvessels for progressive vascularization in large regenerative implants. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022;11(4). doi: 10.1002/adhm.202101836
- Anada T, Pan CC, Stahl AM, et al. Vascularized bone-mimetic hydrogel constructs by 3d bioprinting to promote osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(5):1096. doi: 10.3390/ijms20051096
- Kuss MA, Wu S, Wang Y, et al. Prevascularization of 3D printed bone scaffolds by bioactive hydrogels and cell co-culture. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018;106(5):1788–1798. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33994
- Shabunin AS, Asadulaev MS, Vissarionov SV, et al. Surgical treatment of children with extensive bone defects (literature review). Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery. 2021;9(3):353–366. EDN: XHHVUM doi: 10.17816/PTORS65071
- Weigand A, Beier JP, Hess A, et al. Acceleration of vascularized bone tissue-engineered constructs in a large animal model combining intrinsic and extrinsic vascularization. Tissue Eng Part A. 2015;21(9–10):1680–1694. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0568
- Steiner D, Reinhardt L, Fischer L, et al. Impact of endothelial progenitor cells in the vascularization of osteogenic scaffolds. Cells. 2022;11(6):926. doi: 10.3390/cells11060926
- Koepple C, Pollmann L, Pollmann NS, et al. Microporous polylactic acid scaffolds enable fluorescence-based perfusion imaging of intrinsic in vivo vascularization. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(19). doi: 10.3390/ijms241914813
- Kratzer S, Arkudas A, Himmler M, et al. Vascularization of poly-ε-caprolactone-collagen i-nanofibers with or without sacrificial fibers in the neurotized arteriovenous loop model. Cells. 2022;11(23). doi: 10.3390/cells11233774
- Eweida A, Flechtenmacher S, Sandberg E, et al. Systemically injected bone marrow mononuclear cells specifically home to axially vascularized tissue engineering constructs. PLoS One. 2022;17(8). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272697
- Vaghela R, Arkudas A, Gage D, et al. Microvascular development in the rat arteriovenous loop model in vivo – A step by step intravital microscopy analysis. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2022;110(9):1551–1563. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.37395
- Kim BS, Chen SH, Vasella M, et al. In vivo evaluation of mechanically processed stromal vascular fraction in a chamber vascularized by an arteriovenous shunt. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(2):417. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020417
- Yuan Q, Bleiziffer O, Boos AM, et al. PHDs inhibitor DMOG promotes the vascularization process in the AV loop by HIF-1a up-regulation and the preliminary discussion on its kinetics in rat. BMC Biotechnol. 2014;14:112. doi: 10.1186/s12896-014-0112-x
- Biggemann J, Pezoldt M, Stumpf M, et al. Modular ceramic scaffolds for individual implants. Acta Biomater. 2018;80:390–400. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.008
- Kengelbach-Weigand A, Thielen C, Bäuerle T, et al. Personalized medicine for reconstruction of critical-size bone defects – a translational approach with customizable vascularized bone tissue. NPJ Regen Med. 2021;6(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s41536-021-00158-8
- Wu X, Wang Q, Kang N, et al. The effects of different vascular carrier patterns on the angiogenesis and osteogenesis of BMSC-TCP-based tissue-engineered bone in beagle dogs. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;11(2):542–552. doi: 10.1002/term.2076
- Yang YP, Gadomski BC, Bruyas A, et al. Investigation of a prevascularized bone graft for large defects in the ovine tibia. Tissue Eng Part A. 2021;27(23–24):1458–1469. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0347
- Yang YP, Labus KM, Gadomski BC, et al. Osteoinductive 3D printed scaffold healed 5 cm segmental bone defects in the ovine metatarsus. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86210-5
- Vidal L, Brennan MÁ, Krissian S, et al. In situ production of pre-vascularized synthetic bone grafts for regenerating critical-sized defects in rabbits. Acta Biomater. 2020;114:384–394. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.030
- Kawai T, Pan CC, Okuzu Y, et al. Combining a vascular bundle and 3D printed scaffold with BMP-2 improves bone repair and angiogenesis. Tissue Eng Part A. 2021;27(23–24):1517–1525. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2021.0049
补充文件
