学龄前儿童先天性半椎体畸形的背侧入路手术治疗的比较分析
- 作者: Vissarionov S.V.1, Syundyukov A.R.2, Kokushin D.N.1, Khusainov N.O.1, Khardikov M.A.1
-
隶属关系:
- The Turner Scientific Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics
- Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Endoprosthetics
- 期: 卷 7, 编号 4 (2019)
- 页面: 5-14
- 栏目: Original Study Article
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/turner/article/view/10979
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PTORS745-14
- ID: 10979
如何引用文章
详细
论证:目前,已有足够多的研究对手术干预结果进行评价,并对治疗儿童先天性脊柱畸形的各种手术
技术进行了比较分析。然而,没有共识关于手术的选择访问异常椎,考虑到操作的持续时间,术中
失血,修正的大小在干预,实现金属的长度固定的保护导致长期观测时期。
本研究的目的是针对孤立性椎体形成障碍,找出有先天性胸椎和腰椎畸形的学龄前儿童的手术治疗的
背部入路和联合入路的优缺点。
材料与方法:回顾性分析56例5岁以下胸椎、腰椎孤立半椎体背景下先天性脊柱畸形患者的治疗情况
(第1组;n = 30)或两者结合(第2组;n = 26)访问。
结果:所有患者的矢状位和前位脊柱外形均有改善。但在远期,第一组患者的腰椎畸形后凸部分从
19°例发展到8°例,而脊柱侧弯部分的矫正值保持稳定。第一组患者术中出血量较少(234 毫升,
第二组为319 毫升),手术时间较长(310和185分钟)。平均而言,与第二组相比,第一组采用了更
长的金属结构来矫正脊柱畸形。
结论:单侧半椎体联合入路的先天性脊柱畸形矫正可以通过固定少量的椎体来实现先天性弯曲的完全
矫正。然而,在长期的随访中,与背部入路相比,结果稳定。与联合手术相比,孤立的半椎体背侧通
路术中失血量较低,但孤立的背侧通路的手术干预时间较长。
作者简介
Sergei Vissarionov
The Turner Scientific Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics
Email: vissarionovs@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4235-5048
MD, PhD, D.Sc., Professor, Deputy Director for Research and Academic Affairs, Head of the Department of Spinal Pathology and Neurosurgery
俄罗斯联邦, 64, Parkovaya str., Saint-Petersburg, Pushkin, 196603Ayrat Syundyukov
Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Endoprosthetics
Email: asiundiukov@ortoscheb.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8276-9216
MD, PhD, Head of Children’s Traumatological and Orthopedic Department
俄罗斯联邦, 33, F.Gladkova street, Cheboksary, Chuvash Republic, 428020Dmitry Kokushin
The Turner Scientific Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics
Email: partgerm@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6112-3309
MD, PhD, Senior Research Associate of the Department of Pathology of the Spine and Neurosurgery
俄罗斯联邦, 64, Parkovaya str., Saint-Petersburg, Pushkin, 196603Nikita Khusainov
The Turner Scientific Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics
Email: nikita_husainov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3036-3796
MD, PhD, Research Associate of the Department of Pathology of the Spine and Neurosurgery
俄罗斯联邦, 64, Parkovaya str., Saint-Petersburg, Pushkin, 196603Michael Khardikov
The Turner Scientific Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: Denica1990@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8269-0900
SPIN 代码: 3378-7685
MD, PhD student, Department of Spinal Pathology and Neurosurgery
64, Parkovaya str., Saint-Petersburg, Pushkin, 196603参考
- Feng Y, Hai Y, Zhao S, Zang L. Hemivertebra resection with posterior unilateral intervertebral fusion and transpedicular fixation for congenital scoliosis: results with at least 3 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(10);3274-3281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4556-7.
- Zhu X, Wei X, Chen J, et al. (2014). Posterior hemivertebra resection and monosegmental fusion in the treatment of congenital scoliosis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014;96(1):41-44. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588414x13824511650173.
- Мушкин А.Ю., Наумов Д.Г., Уменушкина Е.Ю. Экстирпация грудных и поясничных полупозвонков у детей: как техника операции влияет на ее травматичность (предварительные результаты и обзор литературы)? // Травматология и ортопедия России. – 2018. – Т. 24. – № 3. – С. 83–90. [Mushkin AY, Naumov DG, Umenushkina EY. Thoracic and lumbar hemivertebra excision in pediatric patients: how does the operation technique influence on outcomes (сohort analysis and literature review)? Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2018;24(3):83-90. (In Russ.)]. https//doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2018-24-3-83-90.
- Рябых С.О., Филатов Е.Ю., Савин Д.М. Результаты экстирпации полупозвонков комбинированным, дорсальным и педикулярным доступами: систематический обзор // Хирургия позвоночника. – 2017. – Т. 14. – № 1. – С. 14–23. [Ryabykh SO, Filatov EY, Savin DM. Results of hemivertebra excision through combined, posterior and transpedicular approaches: systematic review. Spine surgery. 2017;14(1):14-23. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2017.1.14-23.
- Chang DG, Kim JH, Ha KY, et al. Posterior hemivertebra resection and short segment fusion with pedicle screw fixation for congenital scoliosis in children younger than 10 years. Spine. 2015;40(8):E484-E491. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000809.
- Debnath U, Goel V, Harshavardhana N, Webb J. Congenital scoliosis – Quo vadis? Indian J Orthop. 2010;44(2):137-147. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.61997.
- Peng X, Chen L, Zou X. Hemivertebra resection and scoliosis correction by a unilateral posterior approach using single rod and pedicle screw instrumentation in children under 5 years of age. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2011;20(6);397-403. https://doi.org/10.1097/bpb.0b013e3283492060.
- Ruf M, Harms J. Posterior hemivertebra resection with transpedicular instrumentation: early correction in children aged 1 to 6 years. Spine. 2003;28(18):2132-2138. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000084627.57308.4a.
- Shono Y, Abumi K, Kaneda K. One-stage posterior hemivertebra resection and correction using segmental posterior instrumentation. Spine. 2001;26(7):752-757. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200104010-00011.
- Zhang J, Shengru W, Qiu G, et al. The efficacy and complications of posterior hemivertebra resection. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(10):1692-1702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1710-0.
- Li S, Ou Y, Liu B, et al. Comparison of osteotomy versus non-osteotomy approach for congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study of three surgical techniques. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85(4):249-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.12886.
- Wang L, Song Y, Pei F, et al. Comparison of one-stage anteroposterior and posterior-alone hemivertebrae resection combined with posterior correction for hemivertebrae deformity: Results of 60 patients. Indian J Orthop. 2011;45(6):492-499. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.87115.
- Xu W, Yang S, Wu X, Claus C. Hemivertebra excision with short-segment spinal fusion through combined anterior and posterior approaches for congenital spinal deformities in children. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2010;19(6):545-550. https://doi.org/10.1097/bpb.0b013e32833cb887
- Yaszay B, O’Brien M, Shufflebarger HL, et al. Efficacy of hemivertebra resection for congenital scoliosis. Spine. 2011;36(24):2052-2060. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318233f4bb.
- Виссарионов С.В., Кокушин Д.Н., Картавенко К.А., Ефремов А.М. Хирургическое лечение детей с врожденной деформацией поясничного и пояснично-крестцового отделов позвоночника // Хирургия позвоночника. – 2012. – № 3. – С. 33–37. [Vissarionov SV, Kokushin DN, Kartavenko KA, Efremov AM. Surgical treatment of children with congenital deformity of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. Spine surgery. 2012;(3):33-37. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2012.3.33-37.
- Виссарионов С.В., Картавенко К.А., Кокушин Д.Н., Ефремов А.М. Хирургическое лечение детей с врожденной деформацией грудного отдела позвоночника на фоне нарушения формирования позвонков // Хирургия позвоночника. – 2013. – № 2. – С. 32–37. [Vissarionov SV, Kartavenko KA, Kokushin DN, Efremov AM. Surgical treatment of children with congenital thoracic spine deformity associated with vertebral malformation. Spine surgery. 2013;(2):32-37. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2013.2.32-37.
- Захарин Р.Г., Бернакевич А.И., Кулешов А.А., и др. Массивная кровопотеря при хирургии сколиоза // Адаптация различных систем организма при сколиотической деформации позвоночника. Методы лечения: Тезисы докладов международного симпозиума. – М., 2003. – С. 28–30. [Zakharin RG, Bernakevich AI, Kuleshov AA, et al. Massivnaya krovopoterya pri khirurgii skolioza. In: Adaptatsiya razlichnykh sistem organizma pri skolioticheskoy deformatsii pozvonochnika. Metody lecheniya: Tezisy dokladov mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma. Moscow; 2003. P. 28-30. (In Russ.)]
- Лебедева М.Н. Массивная кровопотеря как фактор риска в хирургии сколиоза: пути решения проблемы // Хирургия позвоночника. – 2009. – № 4. – С. 70–79. Lebedeva MN. Massive blood loss as a risk factor in scoliosis surgery and ways for the problem solution. Spine surgery. 2009;(4):70-79. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2009.4.70-79.
- Лебедева М.Н., Иванова А.А., Елистратов А.А., Васюра А.С. Патогенетические основы профилактики развития повышенной кровопотери в хирургии идиопатического сколиоза // Хирургия позвоночника. – 2017. – Т. 14. – № 3. – С. 100–112. [Lebedeva MN, Ivanova AA, Elistratov AA, Vasyura AS. Pathogenetic foundations for prevention of increased blood loss in surgery for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine surgery. 2017;14(3):100-112. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2017.3.100-112.
- Национальный стандарт РФ ГОСТ Р 53470-2009 «Кровь донорская и ее компоненты. Руководство по применению компонентов донорской крови». – М., 2010. [National standard of the Russian Federation GOST R 53470-2009 “Krov’ donorskaya i ee komponenty. Rukovodstvo po primeneniyu komponentov donorskoy krovi”. Moscow; 2010. (In Russ.)]
- Бирюкова Е.Е., Плетнев И.Н. Методы кровосбережения и крововосполнения при хирургической коррекции сколиотической деформации позвоночника // Тезисы докладов 13-й научно-практической конференции SICOT; Санкт-Петербург, 23–25 мая 2002 г. – СПб., 2002. – С. 19–20. [Biryukova EE, Pletnev IN. Metody krovosberezheniya i krovovospolneniya pri khirurgicheskoy korrektsii skolioticheskoy deformatsii pozvonochnika. In: Proceedings of the 13th Scientific and practical SICOT Conference; Saint Petersburg, 23-25 May 2002. Saint Petersburg; 2002. P. 19-20. (In Russ.)]
- Imrie MN. A “simple” option in the surgical treatment of congenital scoliosis. Spine J. 2011;11(2):119-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2010.12.007.
- Mladenov K, Kunkel P, Stuecker R. Hemivertebra resection in children, results after single posterior approach and after combined anterior and posterior approach: a comparative study. Eur Spine J. 2011;21(3):506-513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2010-4.
- White AA, Panjabi MM. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1990.
