Use of the method for the formation of the concepts of size and shape in preschool children for clinical research

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to test the method of forming or actualizing preverbal concepts in the conditions of an independent search for a task solution in order to use the method in clinical practice. The conditions of the absence of researcher’s instructions allow: 1) to compare in ontogenetic and clinical aspects; 2) to develop the skills of an independent search for solutions in problem situations; 3) to improve the creative potential of a child; 4) to develop the ability to achieve a goal. The advantage of using the preverbal concepts of size and shape is that this method can be applied to children of primary preschool age and children with a delay in speech development. To test the method, 7 healthy children of the middle preschool age (4-5-year-old children) were selected. The first task was to form or actualize the concept of a bigger or smaller size in children during the simultaneous presentation of 4 flat or volume geometrical figures. The second task was to form or actualize the concept of a flat or volumetric object among simultaneously presented 4 figures of the same size (small, medium or big). To get reward children should have chosen the figure, which was different from the other 3 ones in a trial during the formation of both the concepts. In the both tasks, we calculated the quantity of trials, which were needed for the single attainment or excess of the 70% level of the correct task performance per each type of learning. The behavioral results showed that the learning speeds during the formation of the concepts of the bigger/smaller size and flat/volumetric shape did not significantly differ from each other. It could be suggested that those concepts were equally important for the 4-5-year-old children. The study showed that the concept formation model is a convenient psychological method for testing the level of the development of the higher cognitive functions in participants and its use is possible in clinical practice with the parallel recording of the brain activity (EEG, evoked potentials etc.) in children in the process of their performing cognitive tasks. The described model is promising for identifying intellectual developmental delays in preschool children and can be used to test children with various cognitive abnormalities.

About the authors

Dmitrii L. Tikhonravov

Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: d_tikhonravov@yahoo.com

Ph.D., Senior researcher, Laboratory of Comparative Physiology and Pathology of the Central Nervous System

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Vladislav B. Voitenkov

Pediatric Research and Clinical Center for Infectious Diseases

Email: vlad203@inbox.ru

MD, Ph.D., Head of the Department of Functional Diagnostic Methods

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Inna U. Golubeva

Pavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: golubevaiu@infran.ru

Ph.D., Researcher, Laboratory of Physiology of the Higher Nervous Activity

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Alexander P. Gerasimov

Almazov National Medical Research Centre

Email: APGerasimow@rambler.ru

Researcher, Group of Epigenetics and Metagenomics in Perinatology and Pediatrics, Laboratory of Epileptology, Polenov Neurosurgical Institute

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Artem Y. Pashkov

Pediatric Research and Clinical Center for Infectious Diseases

Email: pashkovay@gmail.com

Doctor, Rehabilitation Department

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Выготский Л.С. Избранные психологические исследования: Мышление и речь. – М.: АПН РСФСР, 1956. [Vygotskiy LS. Izbrannye psikhologicheskie issledovaniya: Myshlenie i rech’. Moscow: APN RSFSR; 1956. (In Russ.)]
  2. Голубева И.Ю., Кузнецова Т.Г., Шуваев В.Т. и др. Выявление значимой информации детьми 4–9 лет // Приложение международного научного журнала «Вестник психофизиологии». – 2018. – № 2. – C. 15–18. [Golubeva IY, Kuznetsova TG, Shuvaev VT, et al. Vyyavlenie znachimoy informatsii det’mi 4–9 let. Prilozhenie mezhdunarodnogo nauchnogo zhurnala “Vestnik psikhofiziologii”. 2018;(2):15-18. (In Russ.)]
  3. Кант И. Критика чистого разума. – M.: Мысль, 1994. [Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma. Moscow: Mysl’; 1994. (In Russ.)]
  4. Кошелев А.Д. О качественном отличии человека от антропоида. В кн.: Разумное поведение и язык. Коммуникативные системы животных и язык человека. Проблема происхождения языка. Выпуск 1. – М.; 2008. – С. 193–230. [Koshelev AD. O kachestvennom otlichii cheloveka ot antropoida. In: Razumnoe povedenie i yazyk. Kommunikativnye sistemy zhivotnykh i yazyk cheloveka. Problema proiskhozhdeniya yazyka. Vypusk 1. Moscow; 2008. p. 193-230. (In Russ.)]
  5. Пиаже Ж. Речь и мышление ребенка. – М.: Педагогика-Пресс, 1999. [Piazhe Zh. Rech’ i myshlenie rebenka. Moscow: Pedagogika-Press; 1999. (In Russ.)]
  6. Тихонравов Д.Л., Дубровская Н.М., Журавин И.А. Сравнительный анализ процесса формирования понятий размера и формы у низших обезьян (Macaca mulatta) // Журнал эволюционной биохимии и физиологии. – 2018. – Т. 54. – № 3. – С. 205–211. [Tikhonravov DL, Dubrovskaya NM, Zhuravin IA. The notions of size and shape in old world monkeys: a comparative analysis of the formation process. Zh Evol Biokhim Fiziol. 2018;54(3):205-211. (In Russ.)]
  7. acto-russia.org [интернет]. Хельсинкская декларация Всемирной медицинской ассоциации: Этические принципы проведения научных медицинских исследований с участием человека в качестве субъекта. Принята на 18-й Генеральной Ассамблее ВМА, Хельсинки, Финляндия, июнь 1964 г. Последние изменения внесены на 64-й Генеральной Ассамблее ВМА, Форталеза, Бразилия, октябрь 2013 г. [доступ от 26.12.2019]. Доступно по http://acto-russia.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=21 [acto-russia.org [Internet]. Khel’sinkskaya deklaratsiya Vsemirnoy meditsinskoy assotsiatsii: Eticheskie printsipy provedeniya nauchnykh meditsinskikh issledovaniy s uchastiem cheloveka v kachestve sub’’ekta. Prinyata na 18-oy General’noy Assamblee VMA, Khel’sinki, Finlyandiya, iyun’ 1964 g. Poslednie izmeneniya vneseny na 64-oy General’noy Assamblee VMA, Fortaleza, Braziliya, oktyabr’ 2013 g. [cited 26 Dec 2019]. Available from: http://acto-russia.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=21. (In Russ.)]
  8. Karg K, Schmelz M, Call J, Tomasello M. Differing views: Can chimpanzees do Level 2 perspective-taking? Anim Cogn. 2016;19(3):555-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-0956-7.
  9. Kovacs AM, Teglas E, Endress AD. The social sense: susceptibility to others’ beliefs in human infants and adults. Science. 2010;330(6012):1830-1834. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190792.
  10. Lyn H, Greenfield PM, Savage-Rumbaugh S, et al. Nonhuman Primates do Declare! A Comparison of Declarative Symbol and Gesture Use in Two Children, Two Bonobos, and A Chimpanzee. Lang Commun. 2011;31(1):63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2010.11.001.
  11. Moll H, Tomasello M. 12- and 18-month-old infants follow gaze to spaces behind barriers. Dev Sci. 2004;7(1): F1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00315.x.
  12. Murai C, Kosugi D, Tomonaga M, et al. Can chimpanzee infants (Pan troglodytes) form categorical representations in the same manner as human infants (Homo sapiens)? Dev Sci. 2005;8(3):240-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00413.x.
  13. Roby AC, Kidd E. The referential communication skills of children with imaginary companions. Dev Sci. 2008;11(4):531-540. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00699.x.
  14. Schwier C, Van Maanen C, Carpenter M, Tomasello M. Rational imitation in 12-month-old infants. Infancy. 2006;10(3):303-311.
  15. Taylor M, Carlson SM. The Relation between Individual Differences in Fantasy and Theory of Mind. Child Dev. 1997;68(3):436-455. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131670.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. The examples of geometric figures in trials for forming a bigger/smaller-sized concept (in this case, the smaller-sized concept among the other three flat figures – а–c) and a flat/volumetric shape concept (in this case, the volumetric shape concept among the other three flat figures of the same size — d–f ). The arrow shows the correct choice in a child

Download (241KB)
3. Fig. 2. The comparison of trial numbers which were needed for the single attainment or excess of the 70% level of the correct task performance. Y-axis: trial numbers (Mean + SEM). a – the comparison of trial numbers during forming the concept of size (smaller- or bigger-sized figures) in the following types of learning: small/big (s/b), small/medium (s/m) and big/medium (b/m). b – the comparison of trial numbers during forming the concept of shape (flat or volumetric shape figures) in the process of choosing among Small, Medium or Big figures. c – the comparison of the averaged values of trial numbers per all of the types of learning during forming the concept of Size with those during forming the concept of Shape

Download (17KB)

Copyright (c) 2020 Tikhonravov D.L., Voitenkov V.B., Golubeva I.U., Gerasimov A.P., Pashkov A.Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies