Variability of arterial pressure and cardiac rhythm in patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus: Effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Introduction: A factor that worsens the course of coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) is cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN), in which the risk of sudden death increases fivefold. The prevalence of CAN in patients with both CHD and DM2 may reach 60%. Classic cardiovascular tests (CCT) do not permit identification of CAN at the preclinical stage. A modern method of treatment for DM2 uses sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, which have confirmed cardioprotective effects.

Aim: To analyze the prevalence of alterations of arterial pressure variability (APV) and of heart rhythm variability (HRV) in patients with both CHD and DM2 and the effect of empagliflozin on these parameters.

Materials and methods: A total of 210 patients aged 64.5 ± 6.7 years (103 men) with both CHD and DM2 were examined (group1). Anthropometric and biochemical parameters were analyzed, electrocardiogram and arterial pressure were monitored daily, and CCT was performed. For comparison, 64 patients with CHD with no alterations in the carbohydrate metabolism were examined (group2, n=64, aged 66.4 ± 2.3 years). Further, among patients in group1, patients with impaired HRV and APV were selected, but they had CCT scores < 4.0, and they were divided into group1G (n=22) where empagliflozin was added (10–25 mg/day) and group1C (n=20) where the previous therapy was continued.

Results:  CAN was detected in 22% of patients with CHD and DM2, and all patients had impaired HRV and ADV. Deviations of HRV and APV parameters with normal CCT scores (< 4.0) were detected in 43% of the patients. Within 6 months of treatment with empagliflozin, the HbA1c level decreased from 8.38% ± 0.56% to 6.9% ± 0.26% (p< 0.05); in the groupwithout empagliflozin treatment, it decreased from 8.28% ± 0.32% to 7.30% ± 0.29% (p< 0.05). In the empagliflozin group, the average heart rate per day decreased from 86.7 ± 2.4 to 76.7 ± 2.1 beats/min (p< 0.05), the circadian index increased from 1.19 ± 0.02 to 1.30 ± 0.01 (p< 0.05), the SDNN increased from 106.1 ± 2.21 to 114.03 ± 2.34 ms (p< 0.05), and the systolic arterial pressure variability index decreased from 22.9% ± 1.7% to 16.4% ± 1.9% at daytime (p< 0.05) and from 16.8% ± 2.2% to 12.3% ± 2.6% at nighttime (p< 0.05).

Conclusion: The identified alterations of HRV and APV parameters may be manifestations of CAN, and CCT score < 4.0 may indicate the preclinical stage. Positive dynamics of HRV and APV was recorded with empagliflozin therapy, which improved the functional condition of the autonomic nervous system.

About the authors

Anastasia V. Kotskaya

Rostov Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: nastya369437@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7390-7792
SPIN-code: 3961-3354
Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Elizaveta V. Salaychuk

Rostov State Medical University

Email: liza14.2014@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5949-686X

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med)

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Vladimir I. Kudinov

Rostov State Medical University

Email: endo-kudinov@mail.ru

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med)

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Vladimir P. Terentyev

Rostov State Medical University

Email: vpterentev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3607-5832

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Maria S. Lankina

Rostov State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: maryhome@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6121-7831
SPIN-code: 4239-0906
Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

References

  1. The Demographic Yearbook of Russia. 2015. Statistical handbook / Rosstat. Moscow; 2015. (In Russ).
  2. Vishnevskii KA, Zemchenkov AYu, Gerasimchuk RP, et al. Pharmacoeconomic of CKD-MBD Treatment: Literature Review. Nephrology. 2018;22(1):38–51. (In Russ). doi: 10.24884/1561-6274-2018-22-1-38-51
  3. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic he art failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. European Heart Journal. 2016;37:2129–2200. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128
  4. Roger LV, Go AS, Lloid–Jones DM, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics ― 2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125(1):188–97. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182456d46
  5. Pappachan JM, Sebastian J, Bino BC, et al. Cardiac autonomic neuropathy in diabetes mellitus: prevalence, risk factors and utility of corrected QT interval in the ECG for its diagnosis. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2008;84(990):205–10. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2007.064048
  6. Dedov II, Shestakova MV, Mayorov AYu, editors. Standards of specialized diabetes care. 9th ed. Moscow; 2019. (In Russ). doi: 10.14341/DM221S1
  7. Boitsov SA, Samorodskaya IV. Mortality and lost years of life as a result of cardiovascular premature deaths. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2014;13(2):4–11. (In Russ). doi: 10.15829/1728-8800-2014-2-4-11
  8. Tkacheva ON, Vertkin AL. Diabeticheskaya avtonomnaya neyropatiya. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2009. (In Russ).
  9. Sharonova LA, Verbovoy AF. The place of gliflozins in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Farmateka. 2019;26(4):105–10. (In Russ). doi: 10.18565/pharmateca.2019.4.105-110
  10. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;373(2):2117–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720
  11. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, et al. Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;377(7):644–57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611925
  12. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, et al. Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2019;380(4):347–57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812389
  13. Rosenstock J., Frias J., Páll D., Charbonnel B., Pascu R., Saur D. et al. Effect of ertugliflozin on glucose control, body weight, blood pressure and bone density in type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequatelycontrolled on metformin monotherapy (VERTIS MET). Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism. 2018;20(3):520–29. doi: 10.1111/dom.13103
  14. Bayevsky RM, Ivanov GG. Cardiac rhythm variability: the theoretical aspects and the opportunities of clinical application (lecture). Ultrasound and Functional Diagnostics. 2001;(3):106–27. (In Russ).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Dynamics of parameters of heart rhythm variability in patients of 1G (receiving empagliflozin) and 1C (continuing the earlier selected treatment) groups in 6 months of treatment.

Download (73KB)
3. Fig. 2. Dynamics of parameters of arterial pressure variability in patients of 1G (receiving empagliflozin) and 1C (continuing the earlier selected treatment) groups in 6 months of treatment.

Download (88KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 ООО "Эко-Вектор"


 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies