Email this article Patient evaluation of general practitioners as a tool to improve the quality of primary health care
- Issue: Vol 22, No 4 (2014)
- Pages: 68-73
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/pavlovj/article/view/4741
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PAVLOVJ2014468-73
- ID: 4741
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The analysis of patient satisfaction (n = 424) of the work of general practitioners and health care institutions at the primary health care level with the use of standardized EUROPEP questionnaires was carried out in Ukraine. The results show lower evaluation by patients of Ukrainian doctors activity and primary healthcare institutions on comparison with European data. For improve this situation need to implement organizational and educational activities.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##References
- A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain / M. Wensing [et al.] // Social science & medicine. - 1998. - Vol. 47, № 10. - P. 1573-1588.
- Active listening: more than just paying attention / K. Robertson [et al.] // Australian family physician. - 2005. - Vol. 34, № 12. - P. 1053.
- Assessing the practising physician using patient surveys: a systematic review of instruments and feedback methods / R.G. Evans [et al.] // Family Practice. - 2007. - Vol. 24, № 2. - P. 117-127.
- Baker R. Measuring patient satisfaction: a test of construct validity / R. Baker, M. Whitfield // Qual Health Care. - 1992. -№ 1. - P. 104-109.
- Coulehan J.L. The Medical Interview: Mastering Skills For Clinical Practice (Medical Interview) / John L. Coulehan, Marian R. Bloc // - 2005. - FA Davis Company. - P. 409.
- Does a patient survey make a difference? / M. Greco [et al.] // Education for Primary Care. - 2004. - Vol. 15, № 2. -P. 183-189.
- Grol R. Patients Evaluate General/Family Practice: the EUROPEP Instrument / R. Grol, M. Wensing // EQuiP: the Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice Care / Centre for Quality Care Research. - Nijmegen, 2000. - P. 94.
- How many patients are needed to provide reliable evaluations of individual clinicians? / E. Nelson [et al.] // Med Care. - 2004. - Vol. 42. - P. 259-266.
- Is the job satisfaction of primary care team members associated with patient satisfaction? / J. Szecsenyi [et al.] // BMJ quality & safety. - 2011. - Vol. 20, № 6. - P. 508-514.
- McAvoy P. Assessing the competence of practicing physicians in New Zealand, Canada, and the United Kingdom: progress and problems / P. McAvoy // Fam Med. - 2004. - Vol. 36, № 3. - P. 172-177.
- Mead N. The general practice assessment questionnaire (GPAQ)-development and psychometric characteristics / N. Mead, P. Bower, M. Roland // BMC family practice. - 2008. - Vol. 9, № 1. - P. 13.
- Patient evaluations of accessibility and coordination in general practice in Europe / M. Wensing [et al.] // Health expectations. - 2008. - Vol. 11, № 4. -P. 384-390.
- The Norwegian EUROPEP questionnaire for patient evaluation of general practice: data quality, reliability and construct validity / A. Bjertnæs [et al.] // Fam Pract. - 2011. - Vol. 28. - P. 342-349.
- Vedsted P. Data quality and confirmatory factor analysis of the Danish EUROPEP questionnaire on patient evaluation of general practice / P. Vedsted, I. Sokolowski, H.N. Heje // Scandinavian journal of primary health care. - 2008. -Vol. 26, № 3. - P. 174-180.
- Wensing M. Feedback based on patient evaluations: a tool for quality improvement? / M. Wensing, E. Vingerhoets, R. Grol // Patient education and counseling. - 2003. - Vol. 51, № 2. - P. 149-153.
Supplementary files
