Comparative efficiency of suturing of defect of kidney after resection with a mesh implant on pigs models

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Aim. Improvement of the quality of the kidney resection.

Materials and Methods. A total of 50 laparoscopic kidney resections were performed on pig models. In 25 cases, resection was carried out according to the standard method of hemostasis of the kidney resection bed using U-shaped hemostatic sutures vicryl 3-0. In 25 cases, the kidney resection bed was sutured according to the author's method of hemostasis of the kidney resection bed using a polypropylene mesh.

Results. The mean operative time was comparable in the comparison groups, intraoperative blood loss was 30% lower in the group of pig models operated on with a prolene implant. The mean weight ratio of the resected kidney to the contralateral kidney was 77.3% after the classic resection of kidney and 85.6% after the resection with use of a prolene implant.

Conclusion. Laparoscopic kidney resection using a mesh implant is a highly efficient method of kidney resection, providing high-quality hemostasis with less traumatization of healthy renal parenchyma. The proposed method is recommended for further study.

About the authors

Viktor B. Filimonov

Ryazan State Medical University

Email: vestnik@rzgmu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2199-0715
SPIN-code: 7090-0428
ResearcherId: B-3403-2019

MD, PhD, Head of the Department of Urology and Nephrology

Russian Federation, Ryazan

Roman V. Vasin

Ryazan State Medical University

Email: vestnik@rzgmu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0216-2375
SPIN-code: 2212-3872
ResearcherId: B-9913-2019

MD, PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Urology and Nephrology

Russian Federation, Ryazan

Ivan S. Sobennikov

Ryazan State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: isobennikov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5967-6289
SPIN-code: 6103-2197
ResearcherId: B-7382-2019

MD, PhD, Assistant of the Department of Urology and Nephrology

Russian Federation, Ryazan

Alexandr V. Petryaev

Tula Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: vestnik@rzgmu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3108-1312
SPIN-code: 2259-7779
ResearcherId: B-6892-2019

Head of the Department of Urology

Russian Federation, Tula

References

  1. Ferlay F, Autier P, Boniol M, et al. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Annals of Oncology. 2007;18(3):581-92. doi:10. 1093/annonc/mdl498
  2. Keane Th, Gillatt D, Evans ChP, et al. Current and Future Trends in Treatment of Renal Cancer. European Urology. 2007;6(3):374-84. doi:10.1016/ j.eursup.2006.12.006
  3. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global Cancer Statistics, 2002. CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2005;55(2):74-108. doi:10. 3322/canjclin.55.2.74
  4. Alekseev BYa, Anzhiganova YuV, Lykov AV, et al. Some specific features of the diagnosis and treatment of kidney cancer in Russia: preliminary results of a multicenter cooperative study. Cancer Urology. 2012;(3):24-30. (In Russ).
  5. Chissov VI, Starinskiy VV, Petrova GV, editors. Zlokachestvennyye novoobrazovaniya v Rossii v 2010 godu (zabolevayemost’ i smertnost’). Mos-cow; 2011. (In Russ).
  6. Gulov MK, Abdulloev SM, Rofiev KhK. Quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease. I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2018; 26(4):493-9. (In Russ). doi: 10.23888/PAVLOVJ 2018264493-499

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. I stage of the operation of resection of kidney

Download (53KB)
3. Fig. 2. II stage of the operation of resection of kidney

Download (65KB)

Copyright (c) 2019 Filimonov V.B., Vasin R.V., Sobennikov I.S., Petryaev A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies