On the question of the forensic significance of the Beccadelli test

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The issue of differential recognition of blood is the most urgent for forensic medical examination. Attempts to resolve this issue are not new - back in 1828, Barruel tried to distinguish between human and animal blood by the specific smell that blood supposedly emitted when sulfuric acid was added to it. This smell is characteristic of every type of blood; so, during this treatment, human blood gives off the smell of human sweat, horse blood - horse manure, etc. Some researchers used this sample as early as 1881 (Dragendorf), despite the fact that Barruel himself admitted that his method did not have a strict accuracy.

About the authors

A. D. Gusev

Kazan University

Author for correspondence.
Email: info@eco-vector.com

Prosector

Russian Federation, Kazan

References

  1. Аксенов. Дисс., СПБ., 1913.
  2. Цит. по Бриану. Полное руководство по судебной медицине. СПБ., 1860.
  3. Herrel. По реф. в Zeit. f. gericht. Med., 1923, Bd. 2, И. 3.
  4. Alvarez de Toledo. По реф. там же.
  5. Beccadelli. По реф. в Zeit. f. gerichtl. Med., 1923, Bd. 2, H. 4.
  6. Beccadelli. Biochem. Zeit., Bd. 134, H. 1922.
  7. Rizzatti. По реф. в Zeit. f. gerichtl. Med., 1922, Bd. 2, H. 4.

© 1926 Gusev A.D.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed
under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies