Experience of the laparoscopic-assisted stoma creation use in patients with colorectal cancer
- Authors: Brezhnev DG1, Khvostovoi VV1, Frolova OG1, Moskalev AS2, Makhova OY.1
-
Affiliations:
- Kursk State Medical University
- Kursk Regional Oncology Center
- Issue: Vol 101, No 3 (2020)
- Pages: 441-445
- Section: Clinical experiences
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/kazanmedj/article/view/33877
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/KMJ2020-441
- ID: 33877
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Aim. To demonstrate the advantages of laparoscopic surgery in patients with colorectal cancer compared to traditional surgical intervention.
Methods. A retrospective analysis of 40 patients treatment (the main group) in the Department of abdominal Oncology of the Kursk Regional Oncology Center for the period 2017–2019, who had a pronounced violation of the passage through the intestine due to stenosing by the tumour, was conducted. As a control group, 30 people who underwent open surgery in the volume of a colostomy for the period 2017–2019 was taken.
Results. According to the average duration of surgical intervention, the groups significantly differed (p <0.05), the average duration of surgery in the laparoscopic group was less — 40.5±13.6 min, with laparotomy — 54.5±18.5 min. The volume of blood loss during the operation was greater in the control group and reached 75±40 ml against, 10.5±5.5 ml the differences were statistically significant (p <0.05). The average length of stay in hospital in the laparoscopic group was 4±1 days, which is significantly less than in patients who underwent laparotomy 11±4 days (p <0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in 10% of patients in the control group: seroma of the median wound in 2 patients, ligature fistula in 1 patient. There were no postoperative fatalities in both groups.
Conclusion. The comparison of methods of surgical intervention showed that the results of laparoscopic operations are much better than traditional “open” operations in patients with colorectal cancer since they significantly reduce the duration of the rehabilitation period, accompanied by minor blood loss.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
D G Brezhnev
Kursk State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: brejnev_dmitrii@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 9954-3609
Russian Federation, Kursk, Russia
V V Khvostovoi
Kursk State Medical University
Email: brejnev_dmitrii@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Kursk, Russia
O G Frolova
Kursk State Medical University
Email: brejnev_dmitrii@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 4558-5790
Russian Federation, Kursk, Russia
A S Moskalev
Kursk Regional Oncology Center
Email: brejnev_dmitrii@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Kursk, Russia
O Yu Makhova
Kursk State Medical University
Email: brejnev_dmitrii@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 1271-2899
Russian Federation, Kursk, Russia
References
- Ansa B.E., Coughlin S.S., Alema-Mensah E. et al. Evaluation of colorectal cancer incidence trends in the United States (2000–2014). J. Clin. Med. 2018; 7 (22): 310–321. doi: 10.3390/jcm7020022.
- Arnold M., Sierra M., Laversanne M. et al. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017; 66: 683–691. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310912.
- Navarro M., Nicolas A., Ferrandez A. et al. Colorectal cancer population screening programs worldwide in 2016: An update. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017; 23 (20): 3632–3642. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i20.3632.
- GLOBOCAN 2018: estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2018. http://gco.iarc.fr/today/onlineanalysis-pie (access date: 01.12.2019).
- Haggar F.A., Boushey R.P. Colorectal cancer epidemiology: Incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Clin. Colon Rectal Surg. 2009; 22 (4): 191–197. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1242458.
- Morris E.J., Sandin F., Lambert P.C. et al. A population-based comparison of the survival of patients with colorectal cancer in England, Norway and Sweden between 1996 and 2004. Gut. 2011; 60 (8): 1087–1093. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.229575.
- Majek O., Gondos A., Jansen L. et al. Sex differences in colorectal cancer survival: population-based analysis of 164,996 colorectal cancer patients in Germany. PLoS One. 2013; 8 (7): 654–683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068077.
- Magalhaes B., Peleteiro B., Lunet N. Dietary patterns and colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta- analysis. Eur. J. Cancer Prevent. 2012; 21 (1): 15–23. doi: 10.1097/cej.0b013e3283472241.
- National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Cancer Stat Facts: Colon and Rectum Cancer. Accessed June 5, 2018.
- Boyle P., Ferlay J. Mortality and survival in breast and colorectal cancer. Nat. Clin. Pract. Oncol. 2005; 2 (9): 424–425. doi: 10.1038/ncponc0288.
- Bray F., Colombet M., Mery L. et al. Cancer incidence in five continents. Vol. XI (electronic version). Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer. http://ci5.iarc.fr (access date: 01.12.2019).
- Khitaryan A.G., Prazdnikov E.N., Glumov E.E. et al. The first experience of laparoscopic combined operations in locally advanced colon cancer. Koloproktologia. 2015; (S1): 89–89a. (In Russ.)