Comparative analysis of echocardiography, multispiral computed tomography, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in left ventricular mass evaluation

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. To perform a comparative analysis of multispiral computed tomography, echocardiography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in the evaluation of left ventricular mass. Methods. The study included 44 patients (15 female, 29 male) aged of 21 to 73 years (mean age was 55±11 years). Left ventricular mass was assessed by noninvasive multispiral computed tomography coronary angiography using the 64-slice «Aquillon 64» (Toshiba, Japan) scanner. Echocardiographic evaluation was performed on the «Vivid-7» (GE, USA) ultrasound system. Scintigraphic analysis of left ventricular mass was performed on the single-detector gamma camera «Millenium-MPR» (GE, USA) using the «4-D MSPECT» (University of Michigan Medical Center) software. Results. A comparative analysis of left ventricular mass showed that the differences in median values were statistically significant between all the methods presented. The differences in left ventricular mass calculated using the Bland-Altman method were as follows: between multispiral computed tomography and echocardiography -32±41 gr, between multispiral computed tomography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy «4-D MSPECT» 34±48 gr. Conclusion. Multispiral computed tomography, echocardiography, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy assess left ventricular mass differently, with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy giving the lowest and echocardiography giving the highest mass. Results gained at multispiral computed tomography lies in between the myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and echocardiography.

About the authors

A S Galyavich

Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia

A Y Rafikov

Interregional Clinical and Diagnostic Center, Kazan, Russia

Email: alex_raf@mail.ru

G B Saifullina

Interregional Clinical and Diagnostic Center, Kazan, Russia

References

  1. Bavelaar-Croon C., Kayser H., van der Wall E. et al. Left ventricular function: correlation of quantitative gated SPECT and MR imaging over a wide range of values // Radiology. - 2000. - Vol. 217. - P. 572-575.
  2. Brindis R., Douglas P., Hendel R. et al. ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI) // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2005. - Vol. 46. - P. 1587-1605.
  3. Dewey M., Müller M., Eddicks S. et al. Evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function with 16-slice computed tomography, biplane cineventriculography, and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography comparison with magnetic resonance imaging // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2006. - Vol. 48. - P. 2034-2044.
  4. Drazner M., Rame E., Marino E.K. et al. Increased left ventricular mass is a risk factor for the development of a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction within five years. The Cardiovascular Health Study // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2004. - Vol. 43. - P. 2207-2215.
  5. Faber T.L., Cooke C.D., Folks R.D. et al. Left ventricular function and perfusion from gated SPECT perfusion images: an integrated method // J. Nucl. Med. - 1999. - Vol. 40, N 4. - P. 650-659.
  6. Gottdiener J., Arnold A., Aurigemma G. Predictors of congestive heart failure in the elderly: the cardiovascular health study // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2000. - Vol. 35. - P. 1628-1637.
  7. Gupta S., Berry J., Ayers C.R. et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy, aortic wall thickness, and lifetime predicted risk of cardiovascular disease. The Dallas Heart Study // Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img. - 2010. - Vol. 3. - P. 605-613.
  8. Lang R.M., Bierig M., Devereux R. et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group // J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. - 2005. - Vol. 18. - P. 1440-1463.
  9. Mahnken A., Koos R., Katoh M. et al. Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction // Eur. Radiol. - 2005. - Vol. 15. - P. 714-720.
  10. Salm L.P., Schuijf J.D., de Roos A. et al. Global and regional left ventricular function assessment with 16-detector row CT: comparison with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance // Eur. J. Echocardiogr. - 2006. - Vol. 7. - P. 308-314.
  11. Stolzmann P., Scheffel H., Trindade P. et al. Left ventricular and left atrial dimensions and volumes comparison between dual-source CT and echocardiography // Invest. Radiol. - 2008. - Vol. 43, N 5. - P. 284-289.
  12. Yamamuro M., Tadamura E., Kubo S. et al. Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging // Radiology. - 2005. - Vol. 234. - P. 381-390.

© 2012 Galyavich A.S., Rafikov A.Y., Saifullina G.B.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed
under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies