应用辅助生殖技术治疗各种形式子宫内膜异位症及其合并多囊卵巢综合征的不孕患者的疗效比较研究
- 作者: Makolkin A.A.1, Kalugina A.S.2
-
隶属关系:
- Delta Fertility Clinic Ltd.
- Academician I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
- 期: 卷 71, 编号 1 (2022)
- 页面: 35-46
- 栏目: Original study articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/jowd/article/view/72255
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD72255
- ID: 72255
如何引用文章
详细
本研究的目的是研究各种形式的子宫内膜异位症及其合并多囊卵巢综合征对依靠卵巢刺激的辅助生殖技术项目结果的影响。
材料与方法。回顾性分析241个周期辅助生殖技术的效果。所有患者被分为三个可比组:A组——子宫内膜异位症患者(85个周期),B组——子宫内膜异位症和多囊卵巢综合症合并患者(53个周期),对比组——输卵管-腹膜不孕患者(103个周期)。此外,I/II期子宫内膜异位症(ASRM)的A1亚组有50例(58.82%),III/IV期的A2亚组有35例(41.18%)。在第一阶段,评估了病史以及临床和实验室检查的结果。第二阶段在腹腔镜宫腔镜下行手术治疗,确定子宫内膜异位症的分期及有无伴随病理。在第三阶段,利用辅助生殖技术进行不孕治疗。
结果。当使用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂进行卵巢刺激时,A2组患者的促卵泡激素制剂剂量最大(2230.80±614.09 IU),而使用促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂进行刺激时,A1组患者的剂量最小(1171.43±547.42 IU)。用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂进行刺激的A1组,每次胚胎移植的怀孕率最高,为50%,高于对比组的42.72%。在使用促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂刺激的A2组中,妊娠率最低。A1组用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂刺激的出生率最高(40.48%),而A1和A2组用促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂刺激的怀孕全部终止。
结论。在我们的研究中,我们证实普通形式的子宫内膜异位症与不孕症辅助生殖治疗效果的降低有关,而轻度子宫内膜异位症并不影响辅助生殖周期的结果。使用促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂刺激排卵对体外受精结果有负面影响的趋势,包括合并子宫内膜异位症和多囊卵巢综合征的患者。但由于样本量小,有必要在这个方向上继续研究。
关键词
作者简介
Alexander A. Makolkin
Delta Fertility Clinic Ltd.
Email: mail@makolkin.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8858-7333
https://df.clinic/
MD, obstetrician-gynecologist, reproductologist
俄罗斯联邦, 10, 13th line of Vasilievsky Island, Saint Petersburg, 199034Alla S. Kalugina
Academician I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: alla19021962@gmail.com
https://scanfert.clinic
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
俄罗斯联邦, Saint Petersburg参考
- Giudice LC, Kao LC. Endometriosis. Lancet. 2004;364(9447):1789–1799. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17403-5
- Sergienya OV, Yukhno EA, Pavlovskaya EA, et al. Possibilities of magnetic resonance imaging in visualization of structural changes in the pelvic organs in women of reproductive age with infertility. Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology (REJR). 2018;8 (1):119–128. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21569/2222-7415-2018-8-1-119-128
- Assisted Reproductive Technology. Fertility clinic success rates report. 2020. [cited 1 Dec 2021]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/art/pdf/2018-report/ART-2018-Clinic-Report-Full.pdf
- Dunselman GAJ, Vermeulen N, Becker C, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(3):400–412. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det457
- Horton J, Sterrenburg M, Lane S, et al. Reproductive, obstetric, and perinatal outcomes of women with adenomyosis and endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(5):592–632. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz012
- Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(5):817–821. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81391-x
- Vandeeva EN, Protasova AJe, Kuz’mina NS. Sochetannaja ginekologicheskaja patologija pri jendometrioz-associirovannom besplodii. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2016;65(suppl.):40. (In Russ.)
- Dinsdale NL, Crespi BJ. Endometriosis and polycystic ovary syndrome are diametric disorders. Evol Appl. 2021;14:1693–1715. doi: 10.1111/eva.13244
- Hager M, Wenzl R, Riesenhuber S, et al. The prevalence of incidental endometriosis in women undergoing laparoscopic ovarian drilling for clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome: A retrospective cohort study and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2019;8(8):1210. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081210
- Holoch KJ, Savaris RF, Forstein DA, et al. Coexistence of polycystic ovary syndrome and endometriosis in women with infertility. J Endometriosis Pelvic Pain Disorders. 2014;6(2):78–83. doi: 10.5301/je.5000181
- Guidice LC. Clinical practice: endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2389–2398. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1000274
- Bulletti C, Coccia ME, Battistoni S, Borini A. Endometriosis and infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27(8):441–447. doi: 10.1007/s10815-010-9436-1
- Bezhenar VF, Kruglov SY, Krylova YS, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients and morphological features of deep infiltrating andometriosis, and the results of nerve-sparing techniques for surgical treatment. Ural medical journal. 2019;5(173):24–31. doi: 10.25694/URMJ.2019.05.32
- Mironov AA, Starova AR. Patomorfologicheskaja diagnostika zabolevanij matki, jaichnikov i matochnyh trub, privodjashhih k besplodiju. Aktual’nye problemy jeksperimental’noj i klinicheskoj mediciny: materialy 76-j mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii molodyh uchenyh i studentov, Volgograd, 25–28 aprel 2018. Volgograd, 2018: 465–466. (In Russ.)
- Garcia-Velasco JA, Somigliana E. Management of endometriomas in women requiring IVF: To touch or not to touch. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:496–501. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den398
- Endometrioz: diagnostika, lechenie i reabilitaciya. Federal’nye klinicheskie recomendatsii po vedeniya bol’nych. Moscow, 2013. (In Russ.)
- Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costello MF, et al. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrom. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(9):1602–1618. Corrected and republished from: Hum Reprod. 2019;34(2):388. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey256
- Haas D, Chvatal R, Habelsberger A, et al. Comparison of revised American Fertility Society and ENZIAN staging: a critical evaluation of classifications of endometriosis on the basis of our patient population. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(5):1574–1578. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.135
- Tuttlies F, Keckstein J, Ulrich U, et al. ENZIAN-Score, eine Klassifikation der tief infiltrierenden Endometriose [ENZIAN-score, a classification of deep infiltrating endometriosis]. Zentralbl Gynakol. 2005;127(5):275–281. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-836904
- Nelson SM. Biomarkers of ovarian response: current and future applications. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(4):963–969. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.051
- Kalugina AS, Kameneckij BA, Kornilov NV. Antimjullerovyj gormon kak osnovnoj pokazatel’ ovarial’nogo rezerva. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2009;58(5):M134. (In Russ.)
- Zhao D, Fan J, Wang P, et al. Age-specific definition of low anti-Mullerian hormone and associated pregnancy outcome in women undergoing IVF treatment. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:186. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03649-0
- Broekmans FJM., de Ziegler D, Howles C, et al. The antral follicle count: practical recommendations for better standardization. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(3):1044–1051. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.040
- Jayaprakasan K, Chan Y, Islam R, et al. Prediction of in vitro fertilization outcome at different antral follicle count thresholds in a prospective cohort of 1,012 women. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:657–663. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.042
- Dewailly D, Barbotin A-L, Dumont A, et al. Role of anti-müllerian hormone in the pathogenesis of polycystic ovary syndrome. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:641. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00641
- Coelho Neto MA, Ludwin A, Borrell A, et al. Counting ovarian antral follicles by ultrasound: a practical guide. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(1):10–20. doi: 10.1002/uog.18945
- Wahd SA, Alalaf SK, Al-Shawaf T, Al-Tawil NG. Ovarian reserve markers and assisted reproductive technique (ART) outcomes in women with advanced endometriosis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:120. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-120
- Vspomogatel’nye reproduktivnye tehnologii i iskusstvennaja inseminacija. Klinicheskie rekomendacii (protokola lechenija). Pis’mo Minzdrava Rossii ot 05.03.2019 No. 15-4/I/2-1908. Moscow, 2019 [cited 23 Oct 2021]. Available from: https://rulaws.ru/acts/Pismo-Minzdrava-Rossii-ot-05.03.2019-N-15-4_I_2-1908/. (In Russ.)
- Kolanska K, Cohen J, Bendifallah S, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in women with endometriosis-associated infertility: GnRH-agonist versus GnRH-antagonist. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;46:681–686. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.09.007
- Lambalk CB, Banga FR, Huirne JA, et al. GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis accounting for patient type. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(5):560–579. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx017
- Lensen SF, Wilkinson J, Leijdekkers JA, et al. Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2018;2:CD012693. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012693.pub2
- Kuzmina NS, Bezhenar VF, Kalugina AS. Endometriosis and infertility. Operation or assisted reproductive technologies? Archives of Obstetrics and Gynecology named after V.F. Snegirev. 2018;5(1):31–36. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18821/2313-8726-2018-5-1-31-36
- National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (UK). Fertility: Assessment and Treatment for People with Fertility Problems. London: Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists; February 2013. [cited 23 Oct 2021]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156/resources/fertility-problems-assessment-and-treatment-pdf-35109634660549
- Giacomini E, Sanchez AM, Sarais V, et al. Characteristics of follicular fluid in ovaries with endometriomas. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;209:34–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.01.032
- Rossi AC, Prefumo F. The effects of surgery for endometriosis on pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294:647–655. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4136-4
- Hamdan M, Dunselman G, Li TC, Cheong Y. The impact of endometrioma on IVF/ICSI outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:809–825. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv035
- Shebl O, Sifferlinger I, Habelsberger A, et al. Oocyte competence in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients suffering from endometriosis and its possible association with subsequent treatment outcome: a matched case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(6):736–744. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12941
- Orazov MR, Radzinsky VY, Ivanov II, et al. Oocyte quality in women with infertility associated endometriosis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35(Supp1):24–26. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1632088
- Xu B, Guo N, Zhang XM, et al. Oocyte quality is decreased in women with minimal or mild endometriosis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:10779. doi: 10.1038/srep10779
- de Ziegler D, Borghese B, Chapron C. Endometriosis and infertility: pathophysiology and management. Lancet. 2010;376(9742):730–738. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60490-4
- Barnhart K, Dunsmoor-Su R, Coutifaris C. Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(6):1148–1155. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03112-6
- Akande VA, Hunt LP, Cahill DJ, Jenkins JM. Differences in time to natural conception between women with unexplained infertility and infertile women with minor endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(1):96–103. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh045
- Barbosa MA, Teixeira DM, Navarro PA, et al. The impact of endometriosis and its staging on assisted reproduction outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(3):261–278. doi: 10.1002/uog.13366
- Vassilopoulou L, Matalliotakis M, Zervou MI, et al. Endometriosis and in vitro fertilisation. Exp Ther Med. 2018;16(2):1043–1051. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6307
- Harb HM, Gallos ID, Chu J, et al. The effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2013;120(11):1308–1320. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12366
- Kuivasaari P, Hippeläinen M, Anttila M, Heinonen S. Effect of endometriosis on IVF/ICSI outcome: stage III/IV endometriosis worsens cumulative pregnancy and live-born rates. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(11):3130–3135. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei176
- Werbrouck E, Spiessens C, Meuleman C, D’Hooghe T. No difference in cycle pregnancy rate and in cumulative live-birth rate between women with surgically treated minimal to mild endometriosis and women with unexplained infertility after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(3):566–571. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.044
- Macer ML, Taylor HS. Endometriosis and infertility: a review of the pathogenesis and treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2012;39(4):535–549. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2012.10.002
- Al Kudmani B, Gat I, Buell D, et al. In vitro fertilization success rates after surgically treated endometriosis and effect of time interval between surgery and in vitro fertilization. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(1):99–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.641
- Coccia ME, Rizzello F, Mariani G, et al. Impact of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer cycles in young women: a stage-dependent interference. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(11):1232–1238. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01247.x
- Balen AH, Tan SL, MacDougall J, Jacobs HS. Miscarriage rates following in-vitro fertilization are increased in women with polycystic ovaries and reduced by pituitary desensitization with buserelin. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(6):959–964. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138174
补充文件
