电邮这篇文章 Comparative evaluation of different minimally invasive methods of genital prolapse correction
- 作者: Popov A.A.1, Gorsky S.L.1, Manannikova T.N.1, Shahinyan G.G.1, Petrova V.D.1, Chechneva M.A.1
-
隶属关系:
- Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- 期: 卷 49, 编号 5S (2000)
- 页面: 20-21
- 栏目: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/jowd/article/view/100259
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD100259
- ID: 100259
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
By minimally invasive methods of surgical treatment we mean benefits performed under endoscopic, transvaginal or percutaneous access without extensive opening of the skin, aponeurosis, and abdominal cavity. The development of minimally invasive surgery is currently the most promising trend in all fields of medicine, gynecology in particular. The advantages of minimally invasive technologies manifest themselves most fully at surgeries in hard-to-reach for traditional surgery areas, such as the cervical space of the small pelvis and the urethrovesical segment area. This fact together with high frequency of genital prolapse and dissatisfaction with the results of earlier proposed methods of treatment determined our interest in this problem.
作者简介
A. Popov
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: info@eco-vector.com
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
S. Gorsky
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Email: info@eco-vector.com
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
T. Manannikova
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Email: info@eco-vector.com
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
G. Shahinyan
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Email: info@eco-vector.com
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
V. Petrova
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Email: info@eco-vector.com
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
M. Chechneva
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Email: info@eco-vector.com
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
参考
补充文件
