Email this article Comparative estimation of phytoestrogens and natural estrogens efficiency while using as substitute therapy in patients with climacteric syndrome
- Authors: Vishnevsky A.S.1,2, Safronnikova N.R.1,2, Nurmukhamedov A.I.1,2, Yusupova I.S.1,2, Igamberdieva N.B.1,2, Kandiletu A.Y.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Center for Preventive Medicine of the Association of Oncologists and Gynecologists of St. Petersburg
- Research Institute of Medical Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy M3 of the Republic of Uzbekistan
- Issue: Vol 51, No 1 (2002)
- Pages: 68-73
- Section: Original study articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/jowd/article/view/90023
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD90023
- ID: 90023
Cite item
Abstract
In comparative aspect the clinical efficiency of “natural” estrogen - 17 - ß - estradiol and phytoestrogens for elimination of climacteric syndrome and age hyperlipoidemia appearing was studied.
Climadinon can be considered as alternative classic substitute therapy preparation for the treatment of vasovegetal disorders within climacteric syndrome. The absence of side effects allows recommend this preparation on the first stage of patients treatment. Should the phytoestrogens effect became weaker, on the second hormonotherapy stage it is possible to obtain the disorders compensation by means of prescribing preparations, containing “natural” estrogens.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
A. S. Vishnevsky
Center for Preventive Medicine of the Association of Oncologists and Gynecologists of St. Petersburg; Research Institute of Medical Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy M3 of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Author for correspondence.
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Tashkent
N. R. Safronnikova
Center for Preventive Medicine of the Association of Oncologists and Gynecologists of St. Petersburg; Research Institute of Medical Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy M3 of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Tashkent
A. I. Nurmukhamedov
Center for Preventive Medicine of the Association of Oncologists and Gynecologists of St. Petersburg; Research Institute of Medical Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy M3 of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Tashkent
I. S. Yusupova
Center for Preventive Medicine of the Association of Oncologists and Gynecologists of St. Petersburg; Research Institute of Medical Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy M3 of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Tashkent
N. B. Igamberdieva
Center for Preventive Medicine of the Association of Oncologists and Gynecologists of St. Petersburg; Research Institute of Medical Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy M3 of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Tashkent
A. Y. Kandiletu
Center for Preventive Medicine of the Association of Oncologists and Gynecologists of St. Petersburg; Research Institute of Medical Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy M3 of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Tashkent
References
Supplementary files
