Современные подходы к решению проблемы генитального пролапса влагалищным доступом
- Авторы: Гусева Е.С.1
-
Учреждения:
- ФБГУ «НИИАГ им. Д. О. Отта» СЗО РАМН
- Выпуск: Том 62, № 2 (2013)
- Страницы: 51-62
- Раздел: Статьи
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/jowd/article/view/2636
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD62251-62
- ID: 2636
Цитировать
Полный текст
Аннотация
Полный текст
Открыть статью на сайте журналаОб авторах
Евгения Сергеевна Гусева
ФБГУ «НИИАГ им. Д. О. Отта» СЗО РАМН
Email: iag@mail.ru
аспирант отделения оперативной гинекологии
Список литературы
- Беженарь В. Ф., Богатырева Е. В. Диагностика и хирургическое лечение ректоцеле при пролапсе тазовых органов с использованием системы ProliftTM // Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. — 2010. — Т. LIX, вып. 2. — С. 12–20.
- Беженарь В. Ф., Богатырева Е. В. Новые возможности хирургической коррекции тазового пролапса с использованием синтетических имплантов: пути профилактики послеоперационных осложнений // Акушерство. Гинекология. Репродукция. — 2012. — Т. 6, № 2. — С. 6–13.
- Краснопольский В. И., Попов А. А. Вагинальная экстраперитонеальная кольпопексия (метод Prolift) — новый взгляд на хирургию генитального пролапса // Акушерство и гинекология. — 2007. — № 2. — С. 51–55.
- Куликовский В. Ф., Олейник Н. В. Тазовый пролапс у женщин: руководство для врачей. — М: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2008. — 256 с.
- Первый опыт применения в России бестроакарных сетчатых технологий в лечении больных с тазовым пролапсом /Гвоздев М. Ю. [и др.] // Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. — 2012. — № 5. — С. 57–63.
- Сравнительная оценка результатов лапароскопической сакровагинопексии и вагинальной экстраперитонеальной вагинопексии (PROLIFT) в лечении генитального пролапса / Попов А. А., Петрова В. Д., Шагинян Г. Г. [и др.] // Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. — 2006. — Спецвып. — С. 83.
- Решение проблемы тазового пролапса при помощи системы Prosima / Полянин Д. Ф. [и др.] // Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. — 2011. — Т. LX. — Спецвып. — С. 67.
- A new operation for vaginal prolapse repair using mesh and a vaginal support device: 1 year anatomic and functional results of an international multicentre study / Zyczynski H. М. [et al.] // Int. Urogynecol. J. — 2009. — Vol. 20, suppl. 2. — P. 157–158.
- Al-Salihi S., Lim J., Carey M. Video demonstration of vaginal surgery for prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device // Int. Urogynecol. J. — 2009. — Vol.20, suppl. 2. — P. 188–189.
- Anatomical cadaver study of pelvic floor reconstruction using a new polypropylene implant vaginal repair system and a vaginal support device / Reisinauer C. [et al.] // Int. Urogynecol. J. — 2009. — Vol. 20, suppl. 2. — P. S200.
- Anatomic study of prolapse surgery with nonanchored mesh and a vaginal support device / Reisenauer Christl [et al.] // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. — 2010. — Vol. 203. — Р. 590–591.
- Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques / Weber A. M. [et al.] // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. — 2001. — Vol. 185. — Р. 1299–1304.
- Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse / Altman D. [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. — 2011. — Vol. 364, N 19. — Р. 1826–1836.
- Baginska J. E. Prosima — a new device for pelvic organ prolapse repair. An initial experience // Eur. Urol. — 2011. — Vol. 10, N 9, suppl. — Р. 622.
- Bako A., Dhar R. Review of synthetic mesh-related complications in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery // Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic. Floor.Dysfunct. — 2009. — Vol. 20. — Р. 103–111.
- Carey M., Higgs P., Goh J. Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial // BJOG. — 2009. — Vol.116. — Р. 1380–1386.
- Changes in the extracellular matrix in the anterior vagina of women with or without prolapse / Lin S. Y. [et al.] // Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. — 2007. — Vol.19. — Р. 43–48.
- Changing attitudes on the surgical treatment of urogenital prolapse: birth of the tension-free vaginal mesh / Debodinance P. [et al.] // J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. — 2004. — Vol. 33. — P. 577–588.
- Clinical experience of a novel vaginal support device and balloon used to simplify mesh augmented vaginal surgery for prolapse / Slack M. [et al.] // Int. Urogynecol. J. — 2009. — Vol. 20, suppl. 2. — Р. 486–487.
- Comparison of prevalence of hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in women after five different hysterectomy procedures / Lermann J. [et al.] // Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod.Biol. — 2013. — Vol. 167, N 2. — P. 210–214.
- Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapsed surgical repair: a systematic review / Diwadkar G. B. [et al.] // Obstet. Gynecol. — 2009. — Vol. 113. — Р. 367–373.
- Complications requiring reoperation following vaginal mesh kit procedures for prolapse / Margulies R. U. [et al.] // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. — 2008. — Vol. 199. — Р. 678.
- DeLancey J. Anatomy and biomechanics of genital prolapsed // Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. — 1993. — Vol. 36, 4. — P. 897–909.
- DeLancey J. The anatomy of the pelvic floor // Curr. Opinion in Obstet. Gynecol. — 1994. — Vol. 6. — P. 313–316.
- Deprest J., Feolа A. The need for preclinical research on pelvic floor Reconstruction // Int. J. Obstet. Gynecol. — 2013. — Vol. 120. — P. 141–143.
- Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence / Olsen A. L. [et al.] // Obstet. Gynecol. — 1997. — Vol. 89. — Р. 501–506.
- Handa V., Cundiff G., Chang H. Female sexual function and pelvic floor disorders // Obstet. Gynecol. — 2008. — Vol.111. — Р. 1045–1052.
- Haylen B. T., Freeman R. M., Swift S. E. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery // Neurourol. Urodyn. 2010. — Vol. 29, N 1. — Р. 4–20.
- Hegde C. V. Revised use of mesh in vaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery — an overview // J. Obstet. Gynecol. India. — 2011. — Vol. 61, N 4. — Р. 381–383.
- Hurtado E. A., Appell R. A. Management of complications arising from transvaginal mesh kit procedures: a tertiary referral center’s experience // Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. — 2009. — Vol. 20. — Р. 11–17.
- Jeffery S. T., Nieuwoudt A. Beyond the complications: medium — term anatomical, sexual and functional outcomes following removal of trocar — guided transvaginal mesh. A retrospective cohort study // Int. Urogynecol. J. — 2012. — Vol. 23, N 10. — P. 1391–1396
- Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse/Smith F. J. [et al.] // Obstet. Gynecol. — 2010. — Vol. 116. — Р. 1096–1100.
- Lin Tzu-Yin, Su Tsung-Hsien, Huang Wen-Chu. Polypropylene mesh used for adjuvant reconstructive surgical treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapsed // J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. — 2010. — Vol. 36, N.5. — Р. 1059–1063.
- Long-term treatment outcomes of transvaginal mesh surgery versus anterior — posterior colporrhaphy for pelvic organ prolapse / Cao Q. [et al.] // Aus. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. — 2013. — Vol. 53, N 1. — Р. 79–85.
- Lucente V., Murphy Miles, Saiz C. Vaginal Prolapse Repair: Suture Repair Versus Mesh Augmentation // Controversies in Female Pelvic Reconstruction. — 2012. — Vol. 39, N 3. — P. 325–333.
- Luft J. Pelvic organ prolapse: current state of knowledge about this common condition // J. Nurse. Pract. — 2006. — Vol. 2. — Р. 170–177.
- Medium-term clinical outcomes following surgical repair for vaginal prolapse with tension-free mesh and vaginal support device / Sayer T. [et al.] // Int. Urogynecol. J. — 2012. — Vol. 23, N 4. — Р. 487–493.
- Muffly T. M., Barber M. D. Insertion and removal of vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse // Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. — 2010. — Vol. 53, N 1. — Р. 99–114.
- Marcus-Braun N., von Theobald P. Mesh removal following transvaginal mesh placement: a case series of 104 operations // Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. — 2010. — Vol. 21. — Р. 423–430.
- Nieminen K., Hiltunen R., Takala T. Outcomes after anterior vaginal wall repair with mesh: a randomized, controlled trial with a 3 year follow-up // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. — 2010. — Vol. 203. — Р. 235–238.
- Nilsson C. G., Falconer C., Rezapour M. Seven-year follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of urinary incontinence // Obstet. Gynecol. — 2004. — Vol. 104. — Р. 1259–1262.
- Nygaard I. E., McCreery R., Brubaker L. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review // Obstet. Gynecol. — 2004. — Vol. 104. — Р. 805–823.
- One-year clinical outcomes after prolapse surgery with nonanchored mesh and vaginal support device / Zyczynski H. M. [et al.] // Am. Obstet. Gynecol. — 2010. — Vol. 203, N 6. — Р. 587–589.
- Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia / Scott N. W. [et al.] // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. — 2002. — Vol. 4. — P. CD002197.
- Outcomes of anterior vaginal wall repair using polypropylene mesh / Huser M. [et al.] // Česka Gynecol. — 2012. — Vol. 77, N 5. — Р. 407–413.
- Petros P. E., Ulmsten U. I. An integral theory of female urinary incontinence: experimental and clinical considerations // Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. — 1990. — Vol.153, suppl. — Р. 7–31.
- Prospective study on total pelvic reconstruction surgery with Prosima in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse stage III /Chen J. [et al.] // Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. — 2012. — Vol. 47, N 9. — Р. 664–668.
- Resposiveness of the PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7, 12 months following vaginal prolapse repair augmented by mesh and a vaginal support device / Sikirica V. [et al.] // Int. Urogynecol. J. — 2009. — Vol. 20, suppl. 2. — P. 207–208.
- Ridgeway B., Walters M. D., Paraiso M. F. Early experience with mesh excision for adverse outcomes after transvaginal mesh placement using prolapse kits // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. — 2008. — Vol. 199. — Р. 703–707.
- Safety of Trans Vaginal Mesh procedure: retrospective study of 684 patients / Caquant F. [et al.] // J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. — 2008. — Vol. 34, N 4. — P. 449–456.
- Sivaslioglu A. A., Unlubilgin E., Dolen I. A randomized comparison of polypropylene mesh surgery with site — specific surgery in the treatment of cystocoele // Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic. Floor Dysfunct. — 2008. — Vol. 19. — Р. 467–471.
- Surgical management of mesh-related complications after prior pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with mesh / Myrthe M. Tijdink. [et al.] // Int. Urogynecol. J. — 2011. — Vol. 22. — Р. 1395–1404.
- Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse at midlife, quality of life, and risk factors / Fritel Xavier [et al.] // Obstet. Gynecol. — 2009. — Vol. 113, N 3. — Р. 609–616.
- Swift S., Woodman P., O’Boyle A. Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. — 2005. — Vol. 192. — Р. 795–806.
- Swift S. E. The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. — 2000. — Vol. 183. — Р. 277–285.
- The Relationship between pelvic organ prolapse, genital body image, and sexual health / Zielinski R. [et al.] // Neurourology and Urodynamics. — 2012. — Vol. 31. — Р. 1145–1148.
- Togami J. M., Brown E., Winters J. C. Vaginal mesh — the controversy // Med. Rep. — 2012. — Vol. 4. — P. 21
- Townsend P. A., Afremov M. Apparatus and method for pelvic floor repair in the human female // United States Patent Application Publication. — 2011. — Vol. 20. — Р. 1–19.
- Transvaginal prosima mesh and high uterosacral ligament suspension in the treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapsey / Wang W. Y. [et al.] // Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. — 2012. — Vol. 47, N 7. — Р. 500–504.
- Trocar-guided mesh versus conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse; randomized controlled trial / Withagen M. [et al.] // Obstet. Gynecol. — 2011. — Vol. 117, N 2, pt. 1. — Р. 242–250.
- Trocarless system for mesh attachment in pelvic organ prolapse repair — 1year evaluation / Menachem Alcalay [et al.] // Int. Urogynecol. J. — 2011. — Vol. 22. — Р. 551–556.
- Ulmsten U., Herniksson L., Johnson P. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence // Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. — 1996. — Vol. 7. — Р. 81–85.
- Uterosacral ligament in postmenopausal women with or without pelvic organ prolapse / Gabriel B. [et al.] // Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. — 2005. — Vol.16. — Р. 475–479.
- Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device / Carey M. [et al.] // BJOG. — 2008. — Vol. 115. — Р. 391–397.
- Young S. B., Schaffer J. E., Howard A. E. Society of gynecologic surgeons’ (SGS) survey: mesh use in vaginal prolapse surgery // J. of Pelvic Med. Surg. — 2010. — Vol. 16, N 6. — Р. 336–339.
Дополнительные файлы
