Study of the dynamics of microbial communities of Russian rye starter cultures of spontaneous fermentation
- Authors: Lokachuk M.N.1, Savkina O.A.1, Khlestkin V.K.2, Kuznetsova L.I.1, Parakhina O.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Scientific Research Institute for the Baking Industry
- Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 23, No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 249-261
- Section: Ecosystems metagenomics
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/ecolgenet/article/view/361850
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen678986
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EKUPBX
- ID: 361850
Cite item
Abstract
Background: The study of the spontaneously fermented sourdough microbiome is currently receiving considerable attention worldwide. However, the taxonomic structure of the Russian spontaneously fermented sourdough microbiome remains insufficiently studied using metagenomic methods, despite the important role of the microbiome in ensuring bread quality and safety.
Aim: The aim of the work was to study the dynamics of Russian spontaneous sourdoughs microbial communities during long-term propagation. The objects of the study were eight starter cultures of spontaneous fermentation: four thick rye and four liquid rye starter cultures without brewing.
Methods: Four batches of rye flour of different grades (“wallpaper” and “stripped”) were used to prepare the starter. The composition of microbial communities was determined using high-throughput sequencing of fragments of the 16S rRNA gene.
Results: It was shown that during the sequential refreshing of starter cultures, the proportion of representatives of proteobacteria decreases, while the proportion of Firmicutes increases. The changes in the bacterial community coincided with a decrease in the pH of the starter culture, as well as a significant change in the odor of the starter culture from an unpleasant putrid to a pronounced pleasant odor of the starter culture. The mature starter cultures were dominated by representatives of the Firmicutes type, mainly represented by lactic acid bacteria of the Lactobacillaceae family. It was found that in the process of sequential renewal of starter cultures with water-flour nutrient mixtures, a significant change in the taxonomic structure of the starter microbiome occurs at the level of the Lactobacillaceae family. Namely, the relative abundance of the genera Latilactobacillus, Levilactobacillus, Lactiplantibacillus, Weissella, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, Lactococcus, Enterococcus, characteristic for young ferments of spontaneous fermentation, decreased, with a simultaneous increase in Fructilactobacillus and Companilactobacillus in dense starter cultures, and Limosilactobacillus and Fructilactobacillus—in liquid starter cultures without brewing. Lactobacilli Fructilactobacillus sanfranciscensis and Companilactobacillus sp. dominated in mature thick rye starter cultures; Limosilactobacillus pontis prevailed in liquid rye starter cultures without welding on stripped flour; L. pontis and F. sanfranciscensis prevailed in wallpaper flour.
Conclusion: As a result of the conducted studies, there were no statistically significant differences in alpha or beta diversity between the starter cultures bred using different grades and batches of flour. It has been shown that the parameters of Russian starter culture management (humidity, temperature), which differ from those accepted abroad, have a decisive influence on the formation of the microbiome of starter cultures of spontaneous fermentation at the level of lactobacillus species.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Marina N. Lokachuk
Scientific Research Institute for the Baking Industry
Author for correspondence.
Email: m.lokachuk@gosniihp.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5074-2457
SPIN-code: 7622-8404
St. Petersburg Branch
Russian Federation, 7 Podbelskogo hwy, Pushkin, Saint Petersburg, 196608Olesya A. Savkina
Scientific Research Institute for the Baking Industry
Email: 1103savkina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2372-4277
SPIN-code: 7310-0439
Cand. Sci. (Engineering), St. Petersburg Branch
Russian Federation, 7 Podbelskogo hwy, Pushkin, Saint Petersburg, 196608Vadim K. Khlestkin
Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: dir2645@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9605-8028
SPIN-code: 6367-2970
Cand. Sci. (Chemistry)
Russian Federation, 10 Lavrentieva av, Novosibirsk, 630090Lina I. Kuznetsova
Scientific Research Institute for the Baking Industry
Email: l.kuznetcova@gosniihp.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1149-6043
SPIN-code: 9226-0790
Dr. Sci. (Engineering), St. Petersburg Branch
Russian Federation, 7 Podbelskogo hwy, Pushkin, Saint Petersburg, 196608Olga I. Parakhina
Scientific Research Institute for the Baking Industry
Email: o.parakhina@gosniihp.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0508-2813
SPIN-code: 1548-3089
Cand. Sci. (Engineering), St. Petersburg Branch
Russian Federation, 7 Podbelskogo hwy, Pushkin, Saint Petersburg, 196608References
- Gobbetti M, Minervini F, Pontonio E, et al. Drivers for the establishment and composition of the sourdough lactic acid bacteria biota. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016;239:3–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.05.022
- Montemurro M, Pontonio E, Gobbetti M, Rizzello CG. Investigation of the nutritional, functional and technological effects of the sourdough fermentation of sprouted flours. Int J Food Microbiol. 2019;302:47–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.08.005
- Lutter L, Jõudu I, Andreson H. Volatile organic compounds and their generation in sourdough. Agron Res. 2023;21(S2):504–536. doi: 10.15159/AR.23.017
- Easterbrook-Smith G. By bread alone: baking as leisure, performance, sustenance, during the COVID-19 crisis. Leisure Sci. 2022;43(1–2):164–170. doi: 10.1080/01490400.2020.1773980
- Reese AT, Madden AA, Joossens M, et al. Influences of ingredients and bakers on the bacteria and fungi in sourdough starters and bread. mSphere. 2020;5(1):e00950–19. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00950-19
- Corsetti A, Settanni L, López CC, et al. A taxonomic survey of lactic acid bacteria isolated from wheat (Triticum durum) kernels and non-conventional flours. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2007;30(7):561–571. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2007.07.001
- Calvert MD, Madden AA, Nichols LM, et al. A review of sourdough starters: Ecology, practices, and sensory quality with applications for baking and recommendations for future research. PeerJ. 2021;9:11389. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11389
- Martín-Garcia A, Riu-Aumatell M, López-Tamames E. Influence of process parameters on sourdough microbiota, physical properties and sensory profile. Food Rev Int. 2023;39(1):334–348. doi: 10.1080/87559129.2021.1906698
- Mayrink Lima TT, de Oliveira Hosken B, De Dea Lindner J, et al. How to deliver sourdough with appropriate characteristics for the bakery industry? The answer may be provided by microbiota. Food Biosci. 2023;56:103072. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2023.103072
- De Vuyst L, González-Alonso V, Wardhana YR, Pradal I. Taxonomy and species diversity of sourdough lactic acid bacteria. In: Gobbetti M, Gänzle M, editors. Handbook on sourdough biotechnology. Springer, Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. P. 97–160. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-23084-4_6
- De Vuyst L, Comasio A, Kerrebroeck SV. Sourdough production: fermentation strategies, microbial ecology, and use of non-flour ingredients. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023;63(15):2447–2479. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1976100
- De Vuyst L, Van Kerrebroeck S, Leroy F. Microbial ecology and process technology of sourdough fermentation. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2017;100:49–160. doi: 10.1016/bs.aambs.2017.02.003
- Van Kerrebroeck S, Bastos FCC, Harth H, De Vuyst L. A low pH does not determine the community dynamics of spontaneously developed backslopped liquid wheat sourdoughs but does influence their metabolite kinetics. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016;239:54–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.07.019
- Arora K, Ameur H, Polo A, et al. Thirty years of knowledge on sourdough fermentation: A systematic review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021;108:71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.12.008
- Landis EA, Oliverio AM, McKenney EA, et al. The diversity and function of sourdough starter microbiomes. Elife. 2021;10:e61644. doi: 10.7554/eLife.61644
- Costa LF, Kothe CI, Grassotti TT, et al. Evolution of the spontaneous sourdoughs microbiota prepared with organic or conventional whole wheat flours from South Brazil. An Acad Bras Ciênc. 2022;94(S4): 0001–3765202220220091. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765202220220091
- Ercolini D, Pontonio E, De Filippis F, et al. Microbial ecology dynamics during rye and wheat sourdough preparation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(24):7827–7836. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02955-13
- Minervini F, De Angelis M, Di Cagno R, Gobbetti M. Ecological parameters influencing microbial diversity and stability of traditional sourdough. Int J Food Microbiol. 2014;171:136–146. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.11.021
- Harth H, Van Kerrebroeck S, De Vuyst L. Community dynamics and metabolite target analysis of spontaneous, backslopped barley sourdough fermentations under laboratory and bakery conditions. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016;228:22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.04.011
- Oshiro M, Zendo T, Nakayama J. Diversity and dynamics of sourdough lactic acid bacteriota created by a slow food fermentation system. J Biosci Bioeng. 2021;131(4):333–340. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2020.11.007
- Alvarez-Sieiro P, Montalbán-López M, Mu D, Kuipers OP. Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria: extending the family. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100:2939–2951. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7343-9
- Sadiq FA, Yan B, Tian F, et al. Lactic acid bacteria as antifungal and anti-mycotoxigenic agents: a comprehensive review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2019;18(5):1403–1436. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12481
- Darbandi A, Asadi A, Mahdizade Ari M, et al. Bacteriocins: properties and potential use as antimicrobials. J Clin Lab Anal. 2022;36(1):e24093. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24093
- Gänzle MG, Zheng J. Lifestyles of sourdough lactobacilli — Do they matter for microbial ecology and bread quality? Int J Food Microbiol. 2019;302:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.08.019
- Kosovan AP, editor. Collection of modern bakery technologies. Moscow: Moscow Printing House No. 2; 2008. (In Russ.)
- Bessmeltseva M, Viiard E, Simm J, et al. Evolution of bacterial consortia in spontaneously started rye sourdoughs during two months of daily propagation. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):0095449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095449
- McKenney EA, Nichols LM, Alvarado S, et al. Sourdough starters exhibit similar succession patterns but develop flour-specific climax communities. PeerJ. 2023;11:e16163. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16163
- Boreczek J, Litwinek D, Żylińska-Urban J, et al. Bacterial community dynamics in spontaneous sourdoughs made from wheat, spelt, and rye wholemeal flour. MicrobiologyOpen. 2020;9:e1009. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1009
- Afanasyeva OV. Microbiological control of bakery production. Moscow; 1976. (In Russ.)
- Khlestkin VK, Lokachuk MN, Savkina OA, et al. Taxonomic structure of bacterial communities in sourdoughs of spontaneous fermentation. Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 2022;26(4):385–393. doi: 10.18699/VJGB-22-47 EDN: CYDECO
- Lokachuk MN, Frolova JM. Study of the microbiota species composition and biotechnological properties of spontaneous sourdough during propagation. In: Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference of young scientists and specialists “Current issues and modern solutions in food systems”; 2022 Sept 20–22; Moscow. EDN: LPJONE
- Kuznetsova LI, Parakhina OA, Savkina OA, Burykina MS. Starting compositions of microorganisms for sourdoughs. Bakery and confectionery forum. 2021;49:54–57. (In Russ.)
- Afanasyeva OV. Microbiology of bakery production. Saint Petersburg; 2003. (In Russ.)
- Picozzi C, Gallina S, Fera TD, Foschino R. Comparison of cultural media for the enumeration of sourdough lactic acid bacteria. Ann Microbiol. 2005;55(4):317–320.
- Gobbetti M, Rizzello CG, editors. Basic methods and protocols on sourdough. New York: Humana Press; 2024. 176 p. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3706-7
- Bates ST, Berg-Lyons D, Caporaso JG, et al. Examining the global distribution of dominant archaeal populations in soil. ISME J. 2010;5(5):908–917. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.171
- Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
- McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217
- Wright ES. Using DECIPHER v2.0 to analyze big biological sequence data in R. The R Journal. 2016;8(1):352–359. doi: 10.32614/RJ-2016-025
- Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, et al. QIIME allows analysis of highthroughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7(5): 335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303
- Menezes LAA, Salvo Sardaro ML, Duarte RTD, et al. Sourdough bacterial dynamics revealed by metagenomic analysis in Brazil. Food Microbiol. 2020;85:103302. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2019.103302
- von Gastrow L, Michel E, Legrand J, et al. Microbial community dispersal from wheat grains to sourdoughs: A contribution of participatory research. Mol Ecol. 2023;32(10):2413–2427. doi: 10.1111/mec.16630
- Bilska A, Wochna K, Habiera M, Serwańska-Leja K. Health hazard associated with the presence of clostridium bacteria in food products. Foods. 2024;13(16):2578. doi: 10.3390/foods13162578
- Liu X, Zhou M, Jiaxin C, et al. Bacterial diversity in traditional sourdough from different regions in China. LWT. 2018;96(2):251–259. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.05.023
- Oleinikova Y, Amangeldi A, Zhaksylyk A, et al. Sourdough microbiota for improving bread preservation and safety: Main directions and new strategies. Foods. 2025;14(14):2443. doi: 10.3390/foods14142443
- Ceresino EB, Juodeikiene G, Schwenninger SM, da Rocha JMF, editors. Sourdough microbiota and starter cultures for industry. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG; 2024. 495 p. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-48604-3
- Van Kerrebroeck S, Maes D, De Vuyst L. Sourdoughs as a function of their species diversity and process conditions, a meta-analysis. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2017;68:152–159. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.016
Supplementary files





